Inchoate Flashcards

1
Q

What are the elements of attempt

A

mens rea - specific intent to commit the object crime

actus reus

    • common law test: judgement call on how far ∆ has progressed towards completing the crime
    • MPC: substantial step test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do you assess actus reus for attempt under the common law test

A

judgement call on how far ∆ has progressed. consider

  • physical proximity
  • unequivocally clear intent to commit crime
  • dangerous proximity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how do you assess actus reus under the MPC substantial step test

A

something strongly corroborative of intent do the crime like:
- lying in wait
- enticing victim
- reconnaissance (but if it’s just this, probably not enough)
- unlawful entry of the building
- possession of materials for the crime
soliciting an innocent agent to engage in an element of the crime

MERE PREP is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why is the bar so high for actus reus for attempt

A

we don’t want to criminalize stuff that normally is lawful like buying a shovel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how do you abandon an attempt under the common law

A
  • abandonment is timely and efficacious (∆ hasn’t done a lot yet or is able to stop the harm)
  • abandonment is voluntary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when is abandonment an affirmative defense under the MPC

A

if the actor completely and voluntarily abandoned the crime or prevented its commission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when will intent transfer for attempted murder

A

intent will always transfer if you
ATTEMPT to kill someone and
ACTUALLY kill someone

but if you attempt to kill someone and just injure someone else, intent does not transfer

except: kill zone theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is kill zone theory

A

if you commit the intended murder in a way that poses danger to bystanders and you kill them too, then you also had the mens res to kill the bystanders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

does intent for attempted premeditated murder transfer?

A

majority: only works on people actually killed, not injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

does attempt merge

A

yes, if you complete the crime, you’re not liable for the attempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is impossibility a defense for attempt if you were never going to be able to succeed anyway?

A

no, because you believe you are committing a crime, and it would be a crime, you’re liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

can you attempt recklessness

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the elements of solicitation

A

mens rea - specific intent to solicit a person

actus reus - generally, urging or paint someone to do the crime

the words are the crime!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

does it matter for solicitation if the message never gets delivered

A

no, once you sent it, it’s over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

does there have to be an attempt for soliciation

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how do you renounce solicitation

A

have to stop the crime from being committed

17
Q

does solicitation merge

A

yes

18
Q

what are the elements of aiding and abetting

A

mens rea: need to act with intent to aid or encourage WITH the goal of the principal completing the crime

actus reus: assisting principal in some way

19
Q

what could count as actus reus for aiding and abetting

A
  • doens’t have to be something big
  • could be inferred
  • could be thwarting an attempt to warn victim
  • could be taking away a victim’s chance to escape
  • could be standing as lookout
  • the crime doesn’t have to get committed, just attempted
  • mere presence isn’t enough
20
Q

what happens with result crimes for aiding and abetting

A

requires an actus reus of criminal or dangerous conduct (the act at hand) WITH reckless or negligent mens rea about harmful results of the act

21
Q

what’s the majority view for accomplice liability for secondary crimes in aiding and abetting

A

∆ can’t be held liable for a secondary crime unless ∆ had purpose or advance knowledge

22
Q

what’s the minority view for accomplice liability for secondary crimes

A

no advance knowledge requird

23
Q

how do you renounce being an accomplice

A

terminate the complicity prior to the act AND

stop the crime altogether OR

tell the cops/ intended victim

24
Q

what are the elements of conspiracy

A

mens rea - intent to form conspiracy (agreement) AND
intent to accomplish object crime

actus reus - agreement to commit a crime AND an overt act in furtherance

25
Q

what counts as an overt act in furtherance of the crime for conspiracy actus reus

A

basically anything, could be super small, could be mere prep

26
Q

how do you assess if supplier had mens rea to join the conspiracy

A

factors:

  • supplier has stake in operation
  • illegal operation constitute high proportion of supplier’s biz
  • no other legit purposes exist for the goods or services provided
27
Q

what’s the temporal scope for conspiracy

A

continuing offense – starts at agreement and goes on and on

28
Q

what is common law secondary crime liability for conspiracy

A

Pinkerton - will be liable for secondary crimes if

secondary crime was in furtherance of the conspiracy and

secondary crime was foreseeable

29
Q

what does the MPC say about secondary crime liability for conspiracy

A

you’re not liable for unforeseeable acts of others

30
Q

how do you abandon conspiracy under common law

A

affirmative act withdrawing from conspiracy AND

must tell co-conspirators

obviously must be before the crime happens

31
Q

how do you abandon conspiracy under MPC

A

must communicate that you’re withdrawing AND must successfully thwart the criminal enterprise

32
Q

does conspiracy merge

A

NO

33
Q

how do you show that conspiracy is different from the object crime, since it doesn’t merge

A

same elements test - just need one different element between conspiracy and the crime