IN WHAT WAYS DID THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SET ABOUT REFORMING THE POOR LAWS? Flashcards
What is the difference between the Royal Commission of Enquiry into the Poor Laws, the Poor Law Amendment Act and the Poor Law Commission?
- Royal Commission of Enquiry into the Poor Laws- (1832) investigated the operation of the Poor Laws across the country and made recommendations based on their findings.
- Poor Law Amendment Act- (1834) the actual bill passed by parliament reforming the poor relief system to make it more cost effective and efficient, reflecting the recommendations of the Royal Commission.
- Poor Law Commission- (1834) established the Act to implement and administer its reforms, but was independent of parliament.
What was the main reason the government set about reforming the poor law?
• the rising costs of poor relief.
When did Royal Commission on the Poor Laws begin its work?
• February 1832.
How many Royal commissioners and assistant commissioners were there, what were their roles?
- 9 commissioners- compiled a report on the old Poor Law, consisting of recommendations.
- 26 assistant commissioners- collected and collated evidence.
Who were the most influential Royal Commissioners and what were their views?
- Nassau Senior (Oxford Professor of Political Economy)- disapproved the allowance system.
- Edwin Chadwick (lawyer)- strong believer in utilitarianism.
Why was the work of the Royal Commission flawed?
- questionnaires sent to parishes so commissioners could collect data- only 10% replied but this was still a large amount of information to sort through and was difficult to analyse.
- questions were ambiguous and open to interpretation, or skewed to lead parishes to give specific answers.
- findings were based on mass evidence which obscured the complexity of existing poor relief.
- the most influential commissioners had differing opinions so it would be difficult to make proposals.
What area did most of the findings of the Royal Commission come from?
• southern England.
What did the Royal Commission say about the old Poor Law?
- practices were corrupt.
- demoralised paupers.
- the old Poor Law was its self the cause of poverty.
What were the views in the Royal Commission on poverty and indigene?
- poverty was necessary- it was part of the natural order.
* indigene- the inability to earn enough to live on was wrong.
What were the Royal Commissioners feelings towards the impotent poor?
• (those who could not work) should be cared for in an appropriate way.
What was the main problem faced by the Royal Commissioners in terms of able bodied paupers?
• the able bodied poor either could not or would not earn sufficient income to keep them selves from going into poverty.
What did the Royal Commission recommend?
- separate workhouses for different pauper categories.
- parishes should be grouped into unions to provide workhouses.
- outdoor relief should stop.
- workhouses should run on the principle of less eligibility.
- a central authority should be established to enforce regulations on the workhouse system.
What were the main aims of the new Poor Law policy?
- to reduce costs.
- improve efficiency.
- ensure only the genuinely destitute received relief.
- provide a national system of poor relief.
When did the Poor Law Amendment Act come into force?
• 1834.
What were the main terms of the Poor Law Amendment Act in 1834?
- a central authority was to supervise the administration of the Poor Law.
- parishes would be grouped into Poor Law unions to provide relief efficiently.
- each Poor Law union would make a workhouse following the less eligibility principle.
- outdoor relief for able-bodied paupers was discouraged, but not yet abolished.