In-Class Exam Terms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Offender Criminal Profiling - Definition

A
  • process of using all available information about a crime, crime scene, and victim in order to compose a profile of an unknown perpetrator (Ainsworth, 2001)
  • investigative tool used to identify likely subjects and patterns
  • FBI (USA) method: clinical and psychological method that tries to get inside the mind of a criminal vs. British method: statistical and probabilistic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Offender Criminal Profiling - Critique

A

Educated guesswork (specifically USA method) that relies on instincts and street smarts. Different people may read a crime scene differently and pick up on various key aspects. Leaves room for too much subjectivity and bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Offender Criminal Profiling - Citation

A

Ainsworth, 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychopath - Definition

A
  • combination of affective, interpersonal, and behavioral characteristics, including egocentricity, impulsivity, shallow emotions, lack of empathy and guilt, pathological lying, etc. (Hare, 2003)
  • born not made, don’t know the distinction between right and wrong and use charm, manipulation, etc. to satisfy their own selfish needs (Pakes and Winstone)
  • violent psychopathy in youth is associated with structural and functional damage to the orbital cortex (Fallon, 2006)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Psychopath - Critique

A
  • the Bob Hare Checklist (heavily relied on to diagnose psychopathy) could lead to over-identification of individuals
  • the Bob Hare Checklist is pretty arbitrary because it’s based on scoring a 30 or above, if you score a 29 are you not a psychopath, if you score a 32 are you more of a psychopath than a 30? (Ronson, 2011)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Psychopath - Citation

A
  • Hare, 2003
  • Pakes and Winstone ????
  • Fallon, 2006
  • Ronson, 2011 [CRITIQUE]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sociopath - Defintion

A
  • product of environment (poor socialization and harsh childhood experiences), criminal by definition
  • know the difference between right and wrong but do not care (Sutker & Allain, 2001)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sociopath - Critique

A
  • psychopath, sociopath, and ASPD are used interchangeable but the distinction is very important for determining motives and treatment plans
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sociopath - Citation

A
  • Sutker & Allain, 2001
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False Memories - Definition

A
  • Neo-Freudians say that they’re a coping mechanism that falls under the broader category of denial, when someone has experienced an event that’s too traumatic, they replace the actual memory with a false memory or ‘screen memory’ because actual recollection is too painful (Niemiec, 2016)
  • manifestation of a defense mechanism to prevent the individual from truly remembering or confronting trauma
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

False Memories - Critique

A
  • recognition of actual memories often arrises during psychotherapy sessions (Recovered Memory Therapy) but there is the controversy that some psychotherapists planted false memories in their patient’s heads and this lead to lawsuits in the USA (Whitifield, 2001)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

False Memories - Citations

A
  • Niemiec, 2016

- Whitifield, 2001 [CRITIQUE]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Finkelhor’s Model of Sexual Abuse - Definition

A
  • focused on causal factors underlying motives for childhood sexual abuse
  • the 4 preconditions are motivation to abuse, removing internal inhibitors, overcoming external inhibitors and obstacles, and overcoming resistance from the community (parents and children) (Ward 2001)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Finkelhor’s Model of Sexual Abuse - Critique

A
  • model has ben tested and has produced some empirical evidence but it is mostly fragmental (evidence for each precondition but not the model as a sequential whole)
  • the model is vague, contains overlapping constructs, and factors that require teasing apart and clarification. It also fails to highlight a structure that informs treatment (Ward & Hudson, 2008)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Finkelhor’s Model of Sexual Abuse - Citation

A
  • Ward, 2001

- Ward & Hudson, 2008 [CRITIQUE]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stalking - Definition

A
  • pattern of intrusive behavior akin to harassment, includes implicit or explicit threats, as a result target feels considerable fear
  • the willful, malicious, and repeated following or harassing of another person that threatens his or her safety (Meloy & Gothard, 1995)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stalking - Critique

A
  • definitional issues make it hard to classify and research (are you being stalked if you don’t know you are?), statistics are therefore skewed
  • definitional issues on stalking vs. harassment
  • different researchers define it differently, can’t compare their research or rely on it in practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Stalking - Citations

A
  • Meloy & Gothard, 1995
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - Definition

A
  • covers a wide range of conduct including harassment, stalking, and some forms of antisocial behavior and protest
  • adds civil court injunctions in harassment cases and possibility of awarding damages
  • offers greater protection than the previous law since there’s no need to prove intent, but the penalties are considerable (Harris, 2000)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - Critique

A
  • act is too broad and there are very high penalties that can be assigned through negligence; there’s no need to prove intent so there’s room for wrongful accusations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - Citation

A
  • Harris, 2000
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The Rape Myth - Definition

A
  • any prejudicial, stereotyped, or false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists (Burt 1980)
  • ex: yes means no, rape only happens to women, victim was asking for it, etc.
  • acceptance of rape myths is positively correlated with attitudes such as sex role stereotyping, adversarial sexual beliefs, sexual conservatism, and acceptance of interpersonal violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The Rape Myth - Critique

A
  • acceptance by law enforcement and in the judicial system (using Statement Validity Analysis or rape myths in court by defense to try to discredit/delegitimize the victim)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The Rape Myth - Citation

A
  • Burt, 1980
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The Indifference Hypothesis - Definition

A
  • Paul Draper used probability to test the hypothesis of human suffering resulting from a benevolent god (hypothesis of theism) vs. human suffering just being a product of random events (hypothesis of indifference). His analysis showed that the probability of our suffering being based on the actions of a God was much lower than it being based on interactions with other people (Draper, 1989)
  • ex: Nazi Germany (citizens watched atrocities occur and did nothing, they indifferent not evil and this implicitly contributed to the suffering of the Jews)
26
Q

The Indifference Hypothesis - Critique

A
  • Draper’s hypothesis is incorrect because he just focused on theism in general (belief that supernatural forces exist), and not specific religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam, etc.) which all have explanations for the existence of evil (Otte, 2000)
27
Q

The Indifference Hypothesis - Citation

A
  • Draper, 1989

- Otte, 2000 [CRITIQUE]

28
Q

Evolutionary Psychology - Definition

A
  • application of the theories of evolutionary biology to psychology; assumes the human brain is made of mechanisms created through natural selection throughout the history of humanity (Durrant & Ellis, 2003)
  • Theorized that criminal behaviors were advantageous in natural selection when competing for resources with others (Hollins, 2013)
29
Q

Evolutionary Psychology - Critique

A
  • testability of the theory; that they are “just so stories” that provide neat explanations for adaptions that rest solely on logic and not evidence (Plotkin, 2004)
  • theory seeks to find traits that are universal to all humans, subjects these traits are taken from are not from a diverse range of cultures and time periods (very ethnocentric model, championed by western thinkers) (McKinnon, 2005)
30
Q

Evolutionary Psychology - Citation

A
  • Durrant & Ellis, 2003
  • Hollins, 2013
  • Plotkin, 2004 [CRITIQUE 1]
  • McKinnon, 2005 [CRITIQUE 2]
31
Q

Frustration/ Aggression Hypothesis - Definition

A
  • frustration: “the state that emerges when circumstances interfere with a goal response” often leads to aggression. In some situations, frustration does augment the likelihood of aggression. Research indicates that frustration is more likely to lead to aggression if the aggressive behavior helps to eliminate the frustration, amount of frustration depends on how close the individual is to the goal when they are blocked (Dollard et al, 1939)
32
Q

Frustration/Aggression Hypothesis - Critique

A
  • aggressive behavior is just one possible response to frustration, frustration created only generalized arousal and social learning determines how that arousal influences the individual’s behavior
  • more holistic explanation as to why not everyone who is frustrated in a situation responds with aggression which the frustration-aggression hypothesis cannot fully account for (Bandura, 1977)
33
Q

Frustration/Aggression Hypothesis - Citation

A
  • Dollard et al, 1939

- Bandura, 1977 [CRITIQUE]

34
Q

Zimbardo - Definition

A
  • purpose of the experiment was to find out if prison conditions or sadistic personalities of guards led to brutality towards the inmates
  • original plan: 24 male students at Stanford would spend 2 weeks in the basement of a building, split into either prisoners or guards randomly and would be asked to act in accordance with their view on how those roles should be played, guards were told to do whatever was necessary to maintain order and wore glasses to prevent eye contact with prisoners
  • participants were screened for criminal records, drug use, preexisting psychological or mental conditions beforehand, were paid $15 per day, criminals arrested and taken to a police station then brought to the jail at start of experiment
  • participants took on their roles very intensely, experiment quickly got out of hand and had to be ended after 6 days (Banks & Zimbardo, 1973)
35
Q

Zimbardo - Critique

A
  • participants were only men, self-selected and did not give full informed consent, were not very representative of the American population (all students at Stanford) and certainly no the prison
  • led to ethical guidelines by the American Psychological Association, studies must now go through extensive review before being carried out (Banuazizi, 1975)
36
Q

Zimbardo - Citation

A
  • Banks & Zimbardo, 1973

- Banuazizi, 1975 [CRITIQUE]

37
Q

Nature/Nurture - Definition

A
  • concerned with the extent to which particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (genetic) or acquired (learned) characteristics. The nature perspective insinuates that one was born with a certain characteristic and has a predetermined biological endowment whereas the nurture side supposes that external factors such as upbringing and life experiences after birth influence our behavior (Raine, 1993)
  • studied via twin studies, family studies, and adoption studies
38
Q

Nature/Nurture - Critique

A
  • need empirical evidence to support a theory of genetic predisposition to crime (criminal behavior could run in the family which would assumedly be genetic but a family also may have unchanging environmental factors like poor education, poverty, etc.)
  • difficult to tease apart: neither genetic or environmental disposition or an unfavorable combination of the two can guarantee criminal behavior (Hollin, 2013)
39
Q

Nature/ Nurture - Citation

A
  • Raine, 1993

- Hollin, 2013

40
Q

Sexual Offenses Act of 2003 - Definition

A
  • addendum to the 1956 act that added new offenses including assault by penetration of any object, predatory offenses, grooming, exploitation, and trafficking; expands the definition of rape to include penetration of the mouth; moves away from gendered provisions
  • introduces concept of consent: “a person consents if he agrees by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice” (Stevenson, Davies, and Gunn, 2003)
41
Q

Sexual Offenses Act of 2003 - Critique

A
  • outlaws consensual “sexual hugging” in public spaces by minors, critics say it uses the law to make symbolic impact and this is dangerous and leaves too much discretion to law enforcement (Wilson, 2004)
42
Q

Sexual Offenses Act of 2003 - Citation

A
  • Stevenson, 2003

- Wilson, 2004 [CRITIQUE]

43
Q

Cognitive Dissonance - Defintion

A
  • the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values
  • humans are looking for consistency in their beliefs, so when external factors challenge this consistency it leads to irrational behavior and the desire to align beliefs and actions (Festinger, 1957)
  • can reduce dissonance and it can be done by changing your attitudes, finding new information to outweigh dissonance, or reducing the importance of the conflicting beliefs
  • ex: a racist white man with black friends or a person eating junk food when they know it’s bad for you but justifying it by saying it tastes good and by going to the gym
44
Q

Cognitive Dissonance - Critique

A
  • lacks testability– theories are really only valid if they can be proven wrong and it’s near impossible to disprove cognitive dissonance (can’t measure psychological discomfort, amount differs per person based on how much they believe in their values) (Janice and Gilmore, 1965)
45
Q

Cognitive Dissonance - Citation

A
  • Festinger, 1957

- Janice and Gilmore, 1965 [CRITIQUE]

46
Q

Faceted Model of School Shootings - Definition

A
  • theory that maps out four theoretical models for school shooters based on different combinations of sources of distress and expressions of violence; each category can be labeled as internal or external, and the combination of the two (EE, II, EI, IE) each create one mode or typology of school related mass shootings (Fritzon and Brun, 2005)
47
Q

Faceted Model of School Shootings - Critique

A
  • study is based on a very small sample size (aren’t many school shootings to research), it was based off of 93 school associated violent deaths in North America and this is too small a sample size to produce exhaustive validity
  • this is merely a descriptive typology that doesn’t lead to treatment paths or prevention
48
Q

Faceted Model of School Shootings - Citation

A
  • Fritzon and Brun, 2005
49
Q

Offender Rehabilitation - Definition

A
  • rehabilitation is the process of aiding convicted individuals with the reintegration into society, ultimate goal of the modern penal system is to help prisoners learn the error of their ways so that they can eventually leave prison and be productive members of society, includes methods of reducing re-offending following release (Gendreau, 1996)
50
Q

Offender Rehabilitation - Critique

A
  • many rehabilitation methods are generalized and used for the entire prison population, but should not be because they can’t be effective for all criminals once taking into account varying demographics, motives, and the type of crime committed (McGuire, 2002)
51
Q

Offender Rehabilitation - Citation

A
  • Gendreau, 1996

- McGuire, 2002 [CRITIQUE]

52
Q

Serial Killer - Definition

A
  • form of murder that is generally perpetrated by one or a few individuals, involves the murder of multiple people over a longer period of time, there is a cooling off period between murders, though the separate killings are linked
  • usually target one type of victim and often use a psychological signature, which is some consistent action present with each victim
  • one or more individuals commits at least two murders of individuals who they have no previous relationship with, at a different time than the other murders, where the motive is not for material gain and is believed to be for the murderer’s desire to have power over his victim and victims may have symbolic value (Egger, 1990)
53
Q

Serial Killer - Critique

A
  • definition is very subjective: how many murders are required, can it be more than one individual, how long is a cooling off period, is it different for each offender, etc.
54
Q

Serial Killer - Citation

A
  • Egger, 1990
55
Q

Abnormality - Definition

A
  • refers to individuals who are atypical when compared to members of a given society
  • Abnormality can be defined in several different ways:
    1) If it’s statistically unusual
    2) If a person’s thinking or behavior violates social norms or acceptable behavior in a given group
    3) If a person cannot cope with the demands of everyday life or cannot perform behaviors necessary for day to day living, it’s seen as abnormal (McLeod, 2008)
56
Q

Abnormality - Critique

A
  • hard to define because normality itself is such a subjective term, there is no definitive way to determine what is normal, therefore it’s equally as impossible to determining what is abnormal
  • even if we could determine what normal was, how far astray from the subjective norm must someone be to classify as abnormal?
57
Q

Abnormality - Citation

A
  • McLeod, 2008
58
Q

Hans J. Eysenck - Definition

A
  • personality theorist who incorporated biological, social, and individual factors to determine the causes of and characterize personality (Hollin, 2013)
  • claimed personality had two dimensions; extroversion and neuroticism and you could be high or low on each of them. There are different biological causes of each and they in turn can categorize personality. Later psychoticism was added to this test.
  • developed a personality inventory and psychometric test to measure degrees of these categories (Rushton, 2001)
59
Q

Hans J. Eysenck - Critique

A
  • weakness pertaining to measurement and experimentation
  • ex: when investigating the links between individual response and cortical arousal to determine degrees of extraversion, different systems of cortical arousal are activated in different people (sweat vs. increased breathing during stressful situations)
  • How could one be sure which arousal system was activated at a specific time? (Eysenck, 1991)
60
Q

Hans J. Eysenck - Citation

A
  • Rushton, 2001

- Eysenck, 1991