IMRAD FORMAT Flashcards

1
Q

what does IMRaD

A

Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tells the reader what to expect in the paper.

A

Title

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Most papers are written by one or two primary authors. The
remaining authors have reviewed the work and/or aided in study design or data
analysis.

A

Author (s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does the title page contain?

A

Title
Author(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2 types of Abstract

A

“Structured abstract”
Non-structured abstracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

has become the standard for research papers
(introduction, objective, methods, results, and conclusions)

A

“Structured abstract”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • reviews, case reports, and other articles
A

Non-structured abstracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

should be a summary/synopsis of the paper.

A

abstract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

which part of the imrad do these questions belong?

● What is the context of the project?”
● How does it fit in with other research on the topic?
● What is the research question?
● “Why did you do the study” sets the scene or lays the foundation or
background for the paper.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

● Provides the background of the study initiating the conduct of the research.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Significance of your study and the scientific principle from which the
research problem stemmed.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Highlights from previous related studies, such as the research questions and
the variables employed by the researchers.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

State the type of information still needed to address the problem at hand fully

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Expressly, the statement of the problem should be clearly stated and
appropriately justified.
Introduce your approach to bridge the information gap.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

which part of imrad format do these questions belong?

● “How did you do the study”/ What did the author(s) do to answer the research question?

A

Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

This section is the easiest to write because every detail to be written has
already been appropriately documented and stored during the data
collection stage.

A

. Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

You just have to retrieve your records correctly and then explain them in writing.
Because you’re recounting how the methods were conducted, you must write
the methodology section in the past tense

A

Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

You should give a highly detailed account of the various procedures you
have employed that will answer your research questions.

A

Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

This section describes the:
● Context and setting of the study
● Specify the study design
● Population (patients, etc., if applicable)
● Sampling strategy
● Intervention (if applicable)
● Identify the main study variables
● Data collection instruments and procedures
● Outline analysis methods

20
Q

which part of the imrad format do these questions belong?

What did you find”/ What was the answer to the question?

21
Q

in scientific papers are accomplished through graphics or graphical elemen

21
Q

These elements in the methods can be in the form of the following:

A

analytical instrument that you have used for measurement
Graphs
Tables
key findings
Secondary findings

22
Q

showing trends or patterns that exist among the variables tested in the
study,

A

● Graphs

23
Q

summarizing your numerical data, relevant equations, schematic
diagrams, and flow charts

24
these are (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.
Secondary findings
25
which part of the imrad format do these questions belong? “What is the significance of this project?” ● “How does it fit in with what else is known about the topic?”
Discussion
26
The place for interpreting the results.
Discussion
27
The main findings of the study ● Discuss the main results with reference to previous research ● Policy and practice implications of the results ● Strengths and limitations of the stud
Discussion
28
it is where: Do not reiterate the data or discussion. ● Can state hunches, inferences, or speculations. ● Your interpretations will summarize all the concepts and ideas you have discovered. ● must also include a statement proposing your findings' potential application or use. ● Also, write the future of your study as suggested by your key findings in this section. Some researchers often check the conclusion section to identify possible areas they may still explore for their inquiries.
Conclusions
29
Names people who contributed to the work but did not contribute sufficiently to earn authorship
Acknowledgments
30
You must have ------------- from any individuals mentioned in the acknowledgment sections.
permission
31
Complete citations for any articles or other materials referenced in the text of the article.
References
32
It must contain all sources of information used in the paper, whether they are primary sources or secondary sources. ● These sources of information are listed chronologically, following the time when each source is used/stated in the paper.
References
33
Centered in an inverted position, capital letters, bold, 8-15 word
Title
34
listed in alphabetical order, italicized; School/Department
Author/s:
35
: 250-300 words
Abstract:
36
not more than 5, italicized
Keywords
37
1500 – 3000 words
Introduction:
38
500 – 1000 words
Methodology:
39
1500 – 3000 words
Results and Discussion:
40
250 – 500 words
Conclusions and Recommendations:
41
Use the latest edition of the appropriate format: APA format
References
42
Author-date system
In-text citation:
43
Bottom of page, right side
Pagination
44
5, figures:5
Recommended number of Tables
45
15-25, excluding appendices
Recommended number of pages:
46
9 Sections of the Research Paper:
Title Author/s Abstract Keywords Introduction Methodology Results and Discussion Conclusions and Recommendations References