Improperly Obtained Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three categories of improperly obtained evidence?

A

1) Unconstitutionally obtained, 2) Illegally obtained, 3) Unfairly obtained (emerging concept).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case established the exclusion of evidence after a deliberate and conscious breach of constitutional rights?

A

People (AG) v O’Brien [1965]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is required for evidence to be excluded under O’Brien?

A

A deliberate and conscious breach of constitutional rights, unless extraordinary excusing circumstances exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case introduced absolute exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence, even if done unintentionally?

A

People v Kenny [1990]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the three reasons for exclusion of improperly obtained evidence according to McGrath?

A

1) Protect justice system integrity, 2) Deter police misconduct, 3) Vindicate accused’s rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case overturned the strict Kenny exclusion rule?

A

DPP v JC [2015]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the new rule from DPP v JC?

A

Evidence obtained unconstitutionally is admissible if the breach was due to inadvertence or legal mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who bears the burden of proof regarding the constitutionality of obtained evidence?

A

The prosecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ‘fruit of the poisoned tree’ principle?

A

Evidence is excluded if it is causally linked to a constitutional breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case stressed the need for a causative link between breach and evidence?

A

Walsh v O’Buachalla [1991]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can third parties invoke constitutional protections for unlawful searches?

A

Yes, if they live there (People v Bowes), but not as transient visitors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name one example of ‘extraordinary excusing circumstances.’

A

Imminent destruction of vital evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case justified Garda entry due to imminent destruction of evidence?

A

Freeman v DPP [1996]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What constitutional right is engaged when Gardaí detain without legal basis?

A

Right to liberty — Article 40.4.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens to confessions made during unlawful detention?

A

They are inadmissible unless extraordinary excusing circumstances apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case expanded the right of access to a lawyer before questioning?

A

DPP v Gormley and White [2014]

17
Q

Can Gardaí question a suspect after they request a solicitor but before the solicitor arrives?

A

No, as per Gormley, questioning must stop until legal advice is obtained.

18
Q

Is there a constitutional right to have a solicitor present during interrogation?

A

No, but Gormley suggests this may develop in future.

19
Q

What case confirmed that legal consultations must be private?

A

DPP v Finnegan

20
Q

What is the practical effect of DPP v JC on Garda conduct?

A

Gardaí are protected against exclusion for inadvertent constitutional breaches, but deliberate breaches still lead to exclusion.