Important Theorists and Concepts Flashcards
Rosewarne (1984)
Estuary English falls on a continuum between RP and Cockney; it’s an umbrella term covering a range of accents. Speakers using it were thought to be aiming for a “classless profile” and avoid the privileged connotations of RP/the uneducated Cockney label. Common features of Estuary English include glottal stops and L-vocalisations e.g. they’ll pronounce the L-vocalisation in ‘milk’. People correct their speech for social aspiration e.g. RP speakers using Estuary English to sound less ‘snobby’
Labov’s Social Stratification of English in New York City (1966)
nvestigated the presence/absence of the post vocalic /r/ (overt prestige) in the noun phrase “fourth floor”. Middle-class shoppers strove to us the prestigious form the most. There was found to be an upward shift in the working class during careful speech (prejudice to themselves and don’t feel like the norm).
Dixon, Mahoney and Cocks (Matched Guise Approach)
There’s a correlation between a persons accent and how we perceive guilt. i.e. in dialogues between policemen and suspects, the Birmingham accent sounded the most guilty.
Who looked at ethnocentricity and non-native accents (Matched Guise Approach)
Neuliep and Hansen Looked at ethnocentricity and non-native accents. Listeners ranked speakers on attractiveness and credibility. Ethnocentric people rated non-native speakers lowest, showing how accents form part of our identity.
Giles (Matched Guise Approach)
Same speaker spoke with a range of accents and listeners passed judgement. Aged 17 listeners rated RP speakers more intelligent than Brummies, despite them both talking about psychology.
The University of York
Forecasts suggested accents would merge into a national way of speaking, however, experts have found that the Geordie, Scour and Brummie accents are becoming more distinct. Watt (a lecturer in forensic speech) stated: “People want to protect their identity”.
Workman 2015
Paired random faces to accents and listeners rated speakers on their attractiveness and intelligence. The study was made reliable using a silent condition and randomised faces. Yorkshire accent found to be most intelligent, Birmingham accent least intelligent. Reinforces negative stereotypes and low sample sizes.
Trudgill Accents
RP speakers perceived as ‘haughty and unfriendly’. Students with regional accents are perceived by teachers to have less educational potential.
Professor Setter (2014)
9/10 people who speak RP are thought to be more attractive and intelligent
Pear (1931)
People have different perceptions of a speaker according to their accent.
Cheshire’s Reading Study (1982) -
Playground in Reading, asked children whether they approve/disapprove of criminal activity. Those who approved of criminal activity used more non-standard forms (covert prestige). Concluded variation in dialects is a conscious choice influenced by social groups
Labov Martha’s Vineyard (1961) -
Vineyard to island popular with tourists. Interviewed speakers from different age and ethnic groups. Vinyardians had a ‘them and us’ mentality so exaggerated their vineyard vernacular to establish their own identity and show resentment to the tourists (especially Chilmark fishermen due to covert prestige). There was no dialect levelling on the island, despite increased influence from the mainland via the education system.
Kuiper (1991)
Male rugby team talk, men use less face-saving acts and insults to express solidarity.
Labov (1972)
“There is no such thing as a single style speaker and all speakers have a repertoire of styles they can use at their disposal” LINKS TO GILES AND AS WELL CODE SWITCHIBG
Pilkington (1992)
Women in same-sex talk are more collaborative and polite when they don’t agree, men are less supportive.
Giles Communication and Accommodation Theory (1973)
People adapt their language to signal their feelings via convergence (moving language towards other individuals to show solidarity and acceptance) or divergence (speaker exaggerates differences in speech).
Coggle (1993)
“Accent stereotypes are a living reminder of Britain’s ever-continuing class system.”
Goffman (1955)
Sociologist, individuals have positive and negative face needs
Zimmerman and West’s Dominance Model (1975)
Men interrupt more as they are more dominant and wish to assert power. Data collected using recordings from routine locations and middle-class white civilians were the participants. They observed: the number of silences (women used more as uncertain about partners interest), overlaps (used more by males to show disregard to what females are saying) and recovery time after interruption (men were quicker to regain control).