Important Rules (Misc) Flashcards
2 Questions when determine if a Federal Statute Precludes Arbitration:
1) Does text or legislative history show intent to preclude arbitration?
2) Does application of the FAA frustrate the fundamental purpose of the Act?
What claims CAN be arbitrated (non-exhaustive list) 4 things:
Securities Claims
Rico Claims
ADEA Claims
Antitrust Claims (probably)
Arbitrability: What will Courts determine?
Courts determine GATEWAY issues like SCOPE and VALIDITY…UNLESS those powers are CLEARLY DELEGATED to the ARBITRATOR.
Arbitrability: What will arbitrators hear and rule on?
An arbitrator will hear and rule on:
Issues of procedural arbitrability that go to the merits of the case.
Challenges: What is ALWAYS determined by the Court?
Contract formation defenses like assent, consideration, and agency.
(all non-party issues)
Challenges: What will be determined by the court when a DELEGATION clause is present?
Court will determine if the delegation clause itself is invalid (scope issue) OR if there is no clear and unmistakable intent with the arbitration clause.
Challenges: How does one attack the delegation clause for it to be heard by the court?
The delegation clause must be specifically attacked. Merely attacking the arbitration agreement is not enough.
Very hard to do.
Challenges: What will be determined by the court if there is NO DELEGATION clause?
Will determine:
Scope of the arbitration agreement (if the agreement covers the particular claim)
If the arbitration agreement violates state or federal law.
(arbitration agreement itself may be attacked).
Challenges: What will ALWAYS be DETERMINED by the ARBITRATOR?
Will determine:
If a defense to the enforcement of the contract as a whole is applicable.
(Violates state law, fraudulent inducement, unconscionability of the contract)
What is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?
Ways cases may be decided other than by a judge or trial motion.
Like arbitration.
How does the FAA enforce arbitration?
Contracts involving commerce are enforceable and the courts can compel arbitration and appoint arbitrators.
For the FAA to apply, what is needed?
Federal Jurisdiction
Like diversity and federal question
What is diversity jurisdiction?
2 parties in 2 different places (no “look through”)
Amounts over $75k (“look through” present)
What is Federal Question Jurisdiction?
When a state law claim is preempted by federal law (look at whole controversy)
A motion to compel is not enough—court must look at underlying dispute.
Federal Question does not include counterclaims or responsive pleadings.
The FAA reaches to the ____ extent of the ____________ clause.
full ; commerce
Rule on how the FAA effects cases moving up to federal courts?
The FAA being involved does not mean things easily move up to federal courts (even when an issue is present with a specific section of the FAA)
FAA or State law: what does “Bernhardt: establish?
If the contract falls OUTSIDE the scope of the FAA, then STATE LAW on pre-dispute ARBITRATION all apply.
Does the FAA have a preemption provision per se?
NO
The FAA has not preemption provision…but the Supremacy clause does.
Supremacy Clause?
Federal law is supreme to state law when the laws are in dispute.
What happens if there is preemption present from the supremacy clause?
If the supremacy clause preempts state law, then the FAA will apply.
Example of a state law that is preempted by the FAA?
Laws which invalidate arbitration agreements.
Categorical rules prohibiting the arbitration of certain claims are also preempted.
Any laws that put arbitration OUTSIDE the footing of regular contract law are preempted.
State law preempted by the FAA (generallY)
The FAA preempts state law that has a disproportionate impact on arbitration agreements.
What if the FAA does not govern the arbitration agreement and the claim is in federal court?
if the FAA does not govern the agreement, state laws regarding arbitration WILL APPLY in federal court.
Unconscionability: What makes an arbitration clause or agreement unconscionable?
Procedural and Substantive unconscionability must both be present.
Unconscionability: What is Procedural Unconscionability?
Inequities in the bargaining process, like when the contract was adhesive or there was a discrepancy in bargaining power.
Unconscionability: What is Substantive Unconscionability?
Unfairness of a contract term, or one-sidedness of a contract.
Meaning, the provision at issue is so unexpected or unfair that any party who COULD negotiate would NOT have AGREED.
Enforceability: Which case was overturned?
Wilko
Enforceability: Scherk rule:
Not enforcing the agreement would frustrate an international agreement.
(Here, what forum governs)
Enforceability: Dean Witter Reynolds rule:
State law claims have to be arbitrated even if another claim does not.
Enforceability: General Rule:
If one claim is arbitrable, and the other is not, the court must still compel arbitration of the arbitrable claim.