Implied Terms (SGA, SGSA, CRA) Flashcards
what is the difference between a term implied in fact and a term implied in law?
a term implied in fact is implied to give effect to the presumed but unexpressed intentions of the parties
a term implied in law is because court or statute require this regardless of the parties’ intentions
what are 3 common terms implied in fact?
(1) term implied on grounds of trade or professional custom - based on the assumption that it was parties’ intention to be bound by well-known customs of a particular trade
(2) term implied based on a course of dealing between parties if there is a consistent and regular pattern of dealing on such term over a period of time
(3) term implied to give business efficacy to a contract - it must be so obvious that it would not be sensible for the parties not to have intended this term
what are the 3 statutes that imply terms into contracts and what do they apply to?
(1) Sale of Goods Act 1979 - apply to business to business contracts
(2) Sale of Goods and Services Act 1982 - apply to business to business contracts
(3) Consumer Rights Act 2015 - apply between a trader (person acting for purposes relating to their trade, business or profession) and a consumer (individual acting wholly or mainly outside their trade, business, or profession)
SGA: what are 5 implied terms in contracts for goods?
(1) title
(2) correspondence of goods with description
(3) goods are of satisfactory quality
(4) goods are fit for purpose that buyer makes known to seller
(5) sale by sample: bulk corresponds to sample, and goods are free from defect making it different to sample
SGA: what is the implied term as to title?
the seller has the right to sell the goods
SGA: what is the implied term as to correspondence with description?
where the goods are sold by description, the goods will correspond with the description
where the goods are described as having certain characteristics and specifications, they must correspond with this description
SGA: what is the implied term as to satisfactory quality?
and what is the test to assess this?
Goods sold in the course of business must be of satisfactory quality
Goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking into account any description of the goods, the price, and all other relevant circumstances
5 factors are taken into account when assessing this
but there are 2 exceptions to this
SGA: what 5 factors are taken into account when assessing whether a reasonable person would regard the goods as satisfactory?
(1) fitness for all the purposes for which the goods of the kind in question are commonly used
(2) appearance and finish
(3) freedom from minor defects
(4) safety
(5) durability
SGA: what are the 2 exceptions to the implied term that goods must be of satisfactory quality?
(1) there is no condition regarding defects which are specifically drawn to the buyer’s attention before the contract was made
(2) there is no condition of implied satisfactory quality if the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made regarding defects which that examination ought to have revealed
SGA: what is the implied term regarding fitness for a particular purpose?
what is the exception to this?
if the buyer expressly or impliedly makes known to the seller any particular purpose for which the goods are being bought, there is an implied term that the goods are REASONABLY FIT for that purpose (whether or not that is the purpose for which the goods are commonly used)
BUT: there is no such implied condition for fitness for a particular purpose where the buyer does not rely, or it is unreasonable for him to rely, on the skill or judgement of the seller
SGA: what is the implied term as to sale by sample? (2 terms)
when there is a sale by sample, there are 2 implied terms:
(1) the bulk will correspond with the sample in quality
(2) the goods will be free from any defect, making their quality unsatisfactory, which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample
what are the remedies for the buyer if the seller breached a term implied by SGA? what is the qualification to this?
SGA implied terms are all conditions - so this allows the buyer to repudiate the contract by rejecting the goods and claiming a refund
BUT: for breach of all terms other than title, the court can decide to treat the breach as a breach of warranty and only allow the buyer to claim damages IF:
THE BREACH IS SO SLIGHT THAT IT IS UNREASONABLE FOR THE BUYER TO REPUDIATE THE CONTRACT AND REJECT THE GOODS
can terms implied by SGA be contracted out of (excluded/ restricted)?
governed by UCTA 1977:
- implied term as to title cannot be contracted out of
- all other implied terms can be contracted out of subject to the requirement of reasonableness
what 3 different contracts does the Sale of Goods and Services Act 1982 apply to?
(1) contracts for the transfer of property in goods
(2) contracts for the hire of goods
(3) contracts for the supply of services
SGSA: what are the implied terms in contracts for the transfer of property in goods?
same as for sale of goods:
- title
- correspondence with description
- satisfactory quality and fitness of purposes
- correspondence with sample