Impeachment & Rehabilitation Flashcards

1
Q

FRE 607 Impeachment

A

any party may attack the witness’s credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can someone be called for the sole purpose of impeachment?

A

NO, find a separate reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can you impeach your own witness?

A

YES (Chambers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Difference between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence

A

I: answers from the witness you are impeaching

E: calling other witnesses, introducing physical evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Categories of Impeachment

A

i. Character for truthfulness
ii. Prior inconsistent statement
iii. Bias
iv. Incapacity
v. Specific contradiction (not prior inconsistent statement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FRE 608 Character for Truthfulness

A

Subject to a 404/405-esque construction for evidence

Can inquire about specific instances of dishonest behavior on cross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defendant Character for Truthfulness

A

EVERY TIME A DEFENDANT TAKES THE STAND HAS MADE AN ISSUE OF THEIR CHARACTER FOR TRUTHFULLNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FRE 608 Reputation or Opinion Evidence

A

attack or support witness credibility by testimony (Except for criminal conviction under FRE 609)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FRE 610 Religious Beliefs

A

d. FRE 610 evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FRE 403 Unduly Prejudicial or Confusing the Jury

A

Do not do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FRE 609 Introduction of Felony Convictions

A

a. Felonies are brought if (Subject to 403 analysis)

b. Misdemeanors generally don’t
i. Limit on evidence after 10 years
ii. Reasonable written notice to contest it, needs to be highly probative

c. You get to say the name and date of the conviction but that’s basically it
i. You can’t belabor and push the details of the crime
ii. Current charge vs. previous charge

d. Dishonesty crimes are coming in regardless

e. Taking the sting out of a conviction, introducing it yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FRE 613 Prior Inconsistent Statement

A

Examine a witness about the witness’s prior statement, a party need not show it or disclose context

Extrinsic evidence admissible only if the witness is given an opportunity to explain or deny and the adverse party is give an opportunity to examine the witness about it, or if justice so requires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FRE 801(d)(I)(a) Refusal to Restate Prior Testimony

A

Refusal to answer is inconsistent with prior testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Impeachment for Specific Contradiction

A

Something that is just demonstrably false (If they were wrong about this thing then they’re wrong about other things)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Collateral Evidence Rule

A

Can always impeach intrinsically with specific contradiction evidence

BUT IF YOU WANT TO IMPEACH, cannot do so on a collateral matter

You can’t bring in extrinsic evidence to impeach witness on a collateral matter

Its purpose is to “limit the scope of impeachment to the introduction of evidence that is relevant to the important issues in dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Process of Rehabilitation

A

a. It matters HOW you were impeached
b. Truthfulness

17
Q

Impeachment for Bias

A

There is no rule for impeaching for bias which means you can bring in whatever you want for impeaching for bias and the state can introduce whatever it wants for rehabilitation

18
Q

Can you rehabilitate someone before they are impeached?

A

NO

19
Q

What is admitted for impeachment for bias?

A

Facts/factual findings/opinions/conclusions (beech aircraft)

20
Q
  1. FRE 704 Opinion on Ultimate Issue
A

Not automatically objectionable EXCEPT in criminal case, expert witness cannot comment on whether the defendant had the mental state to commit the crime