Impeachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is impeachment?

A

Casting adverse reflection on witness’s credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the general methods of impeachment?

A

Cross-examination (primary method):

  • Elicit facts from W that discredits his own credibility
  • Includes direct examination

Extrinsic evidence:

  • Call other Ws to prove impeaching facts
  • Introduce other docs to prove impeaching facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Five types of evidence used to impeach a witness

A

1) Prior inconsistent statement
2) Bias or interest
3) Sensory or mental defect
4) Contradiction
5) Character trait of witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the purpose of prior inconsistent statements?

A

To show witness has, on another occasion, made statements inconsistent with his current testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Impeachment of a witness by prior inconsistent statements?

A

On cross-examination:

1) Testimony by the witness being impeached; or,

2) Any extrinsic source of evidence (allowed if):

  • Material matter (NOT collateral);
  • W is given opportunity to explain/deny statement ANY TIME (before/after statement is introduced into evidence); and,
  • Adverse party is given the opportunity to examine the witness being impeached
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When may prior inconsistent statements be used for purposes other than impeachment?

A

Non-hearsay (offered for its truth)

  • Previously made under oath (deposition/court)
  • As substantive evidence (to prove the facts stated)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are there exceptions to the required formalities of extrinsic evidence for impeachment of a witness by prior inconsistent statements (NO need for witness to explain/deny statement)?

A

Opposing party’s statement

Hearsay declarant’s statement
- Use to impeach declarant

Required by justice
- Witness left stand + not available when inconsistent statement was discovered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the purpose of bias/interest?

A

Tends to show witness has motive to lie due to interest in outcome of suit
- Even if evidence is NOT admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Impeachment of a witness based on bias/interest?

A

On cross-examination:

1) Ask W whether claimed facts show bias/interest (never a collateral matter)

2) Trial judge has discretion to introduce extrinsic evidence

No limitation on extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are examples of bias/interest?

A

Relationship
- Family/Business/Friendship

Financial interest

Immunity granted (criminal case)

Hostility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Impeachment of a witness based on his sensory deficiencies?

A

On cross-examination:

A witness’s sensory or mental defect relates to the ability of the witness to:
- Observe
- Comprehend
- Remember; and,
- Narrate events efffectively

No limitation on extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are examples of sensory deficiencies?

A

Defects of capacity:

  • Perceptive disabilities (colorblind/deaf/intoxicated)
  • Lack of memory
  • Mental disorder

Lack of knowledge:

  • Expert witness (field knowledge)
  • Opinion witness
  • Character witness (lack of knowledge re D’s criminal acts, despite testifying to D’s good character)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the purpose of contradictory facts?

A

Witness’s mistake/lie indicates erroneous/false testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Impeachment of a witness by contradictory facts?

A

On cross examination:

Contradictory fact -
- Material issue
- Significant to W’s credibility
- Opponent would be precluded from testifying on subject matter

No limitation on extrinisic evidence (NOT collateral)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impeachment of a witness’s character trait based on his reputation or opinion?

A

Only relevant character trait for impeachment is truthfulness or untruthfulness -

1) Truthfulness offered through a character witness who (must have sufficient personal knowledge):
- Testifies to target witness’s reputation for truthfulness; or,
- Witness’s opinion of target witness’s character for truthfulness

2) Untruthfulness by reputation or opinion concerning witness’s character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the purpose of impeachment based on past acts of misconduct?

A

To show witness is unworthy of belief

17
Q

Impeachment of a witness based on past acts not resulting in criminal conviction?

A

On cross examination:

Evidence of a witness’s past acts that did not result in a criminal conviction (or arrest) are generally NOT admissible for impeachment purposes; EXCEPT,

  • If the bad acts are probative of a character from truthfulness or untruthfulness

Must have good-faith belief act occurred

18
Q

Impeachment of a witness based on past acts resulting in criminal conviction?

A

On cross examination:

Crime involving dishonesty/false statement:
1) Felony or misdemeanor

2) Can attack W’s character for truthfulness
- Perjury
- Fraud
- Embezzlement
- False pretenses

Crime NOT involving dishonesty/false statement:

1) Felony only
2) Witness is criminal defendant + probative value outweighs prejudicial effect

All felonies subject to 10-year limitation (see flashcard)

19
Q

Impeachment of a witness based on past acts not resulting in criminal conviction continued?

A

The 10-year limitation (too remote):
More than 10 years has passed from date of conviction/release from confinement, past conviction can only be admitted if:
- Crime was for dishonest act/false statement/felony crime; and,
- Probative value > prejudicial effect

Pardoned or annulled: Any conviction otherwise admissible is inadmissible if:
- Based on innocence; or,
- Made on the ground of rehabilitation, and witness has NOT been convicted of another felony

Juvenile adjudication: Evidence of a prior juvenile adjudiction admissible only if:
- Offered in criminal case
- Agains witness other than defendant
- Adult’s conviction for that crime would be admissible for impeachment
- Necessary to fairly determine guilt or innocence

Appeal: A conviction on appeal does not affect its admissibility

20
Q

Rehabilitaton of a witness maybe accomplished in 3 ways?

A

Re-direct examination:
- W can explain/clarify facts brought out of cross-examination

Prior consisent statement:
- To show statement made before alleged motive arose

Extrinsic evidence:
- Bolstering the witness’s charater for truthfulness (reputation or opinion)