impeachment Flashcards
impeachment methods
2 ways to use impeachment methods
overview of impeachment methods
rehabilitation
credibility and impeachment
impeachment methods
2 ways to use impeachment methods
- Confront the witness
(Ask the witness about the impeaching fact) - Documentary evidence or other witness testimony
(Prove the impeaching fact w/extrinsic evidence)
impeachment methods
2 ways to use impeachment methods
use of extrinsic evidence
- The impeaching fact may be proven w/extrinsic evidence as to all but #6 Bad acts and #7 Contradiction of facts that are NOT collateral
- For IM that allow EE, it is not necessary to ask the witness about the impeaching fact before the EE is introduced except for #2 Bias, intent, or motive to misrepresent.
impeachment methods
overview of methods
- Prior inconsistent statements
- Bias, interest or motive to misrepresent
- Sensory deficiencies
- Bad reputation or opinion about witness’s character for truthfulness
- Criminal convictions
- Bad acts (w/o conviction) that reflect adversely on witness’s character for truthfulness
- Contradiction
impeachment methods
overview of methods
1. Prior inconsistent statements
Any witness may be impeached by showing that on some prior occasion, she made a material statement that is inconsistent w/her trial testimony
GP - impeachment to suggest she can’t keep story straight, NOT for substantive evidence
Exception: If PIS given under oath, can also be used for substantive evidence
impeachment methods
overview of methods
1. Prior inconsistent statements
Exception to allow as substantive evidence
A PIS of a witness may be ADMITTED both to impeach AND as substantive evidence (to prove totma in the inconsistent statement) IF:
- The witness is currently subject to cross exam AND
- The PIS was made A) orally under oath and B) as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial or deposition
impeachment methods overview of methods 1. Prior inconsistent statements Exception to allow as substantive evidence timing
Confrontation timing is flexible.
Not required to immediately confront witness, but after proof by EE, witness must be given an opportunity at some point to return to stand to explain or deny PIS.
EXCEPTION: No opportunity to explain need be given if witness is opposing party.
Also, PIS of opposing party can be used against that party as substantive evidence (party admission or statement by opposing party)
impeachment methods
overview of methods
2. Bias, intent or motive to misrepresent
Bias may be based on any fact that would give a witness a reason to testify (un)favorably about a party’s case.
GP: suggest testimony is false, slanted, or mistaken in party’s favor
impeachment methods
overview of methods
2. Bias, intent or motive to misrepresent
Examples
Witness is a party
Friend, relative or employee of a party
Person w/grudge against a party
Prosecution testifying pursuant to plea bargain
impeachment methods
overview of methods
2. Bias, intent or motive to misrepresent
Procedure
Witness must be confronted w/alleged bias while on stand.
If confrontation prerequisite is met, then bias may be proven by EE
impeachment methods
overview of methods
3. Sensory deficiencies
Anything that could affect witness’s perception or memory.
GP: to suggest mistake
impeachment methods
overview of methods
3. Sensory deficiencies
Examples
Bad eyesight, hearing
Mental retardation
Consumption of alcohol or drugs at time of event or while on witness stand
impeachment methods
overview of methods
3. Sensory deficiencies
Procedure
Confrontation not required
EE allowed
impeachment methods
overview of methods
4. Bad reputation or opinion about witness’s character for truthfulness
Call a character witness to testify that target witness has BAD REPUTATION for truthfulness, or that character witness has LOW OPINION of target witness’s character for truthfulness.
Any witness is subject to impeachment by this method.
GP: to suggest target witness is not telling the truth on the witness stand
impeachment methods
overview of methods
4. Bad reputation or opinion about witness’s character for truthfulness
Procedure
Confrontation not required
EE allowed
Character witness CANNOT prove other witness’s character for truthfulness w/SPECIFIC ACTS, even to show basis of opinion