Impeachment Flashcards
Impeachment
Impeachment casts an adverse refelction on the veracity of W’s testimony
-Any party may impeach any W
Methods of impeachment
1) Contradiction
2) Prior inconsistent statement (PIS)
3) Bias or interest
4) Sensory deficiencies
-E.g. W’s senes were incapable of producing the perceptions to which W testified
5) Reputation and/or opinion of untruthfulness
-Admissible to impeach W’s veracity by use of extrinsic evidence
6) Prior acts of misconduct
-Extrinsic evidence is prohibited
7) Prior criminal conviction
Evidence supporting witness credibility
Inadmissible unless credibility has been attacked (i.e. W has been impeached)
-Exception: W’s prior consistent statement is admissible if the statement was made before W had a motive to fabricate
Extrinsic evidence
Extrinsic evidence may be used to impeach W, except on collateral matters
* Any evidence other than W’s testimony at the current proceeding
* Includes evidence of out of court prior inconsistent statements
* Extrinsic evidence of contradictory facts is generally admissible to impeach W on material, non collateral matters
Collateral matter
A fact not material to issues in the case
* Says nothing about W’s credibility only used to contradict W
-E.g. W1 testifies he was headed to the store when he saw D commit murder; defense cannot call W2 to testify that W1 was really headed to see his mistress - this is collateral (i.e. not material) to the issue of what W1 saw
* Test: to determine if evidence is collateral, ask: would the evidence be material to the given issue if not for W’s contrary assertion?
-If not, it is likely collateral
Contradiction
Any evidence may be used to show W has made contradictory statements on material issues
Prior inconsistent statement
W’s prior inconsistent statements may be used to impeach W’s present testimony
* Establishing PIS: may be established through cross-exam or extrinsic evidence
-Extrinsic evidence is inadmissible if the PIS relates to a collateral matter
* Foundation requirement: W must have an opportunity to explain or deny the statement
-Not required for PIS by a hearsay declarant
Prior inconsistent statements and hearsay
If PIS is hearsay, it is admissible for impeachment purposes, but inadmissible as substantive evidence (to prove the truth of the matter asserted)
* I.e. a hearsay PIS may only be considered for its bearing on W’s credibility
* If the PIS is not hearsay or it falls under a hearsay exemption/exception, it may be considered for any purpose
Impeachment by establishing bias
May be established through cross exam or extrinsic evidence
-Foundation requirement: W must be questioned on cross exam regarding the facts that show bias or interest so that W has an opportunity to explain or deny
Impeachment by prior instances of misconduct
W may be questioned on cross exam about any prior misconduct probative of truthfulness (i.e. lying or deceit)
* Arrests does not equal misconduct: must be an act of lying
* No extrinsic evidence permitted: W may only be asked about prior misdconduct; questioning attorney must accept W’s answer
Impeachment based on opinion or reputation for untruthfulness
W may be impeached by testimony describing his reputation for untruthfulness in the community
Impeachment by prior conviction
- Felonies not involving dishonesty/false statements:
-If W is the D: admissible if govt shows probative value outweights prejudicial effect
-If W is non D: admissible but court can exclude under 403 balancing test - Misdemeanors: inadmissible unless it involves dishonesty/false statements
Impeachment by prior conviction involving act of dishonesty
- Always admissible: court has no discretion to exclude under 403 (rare exception to 403)
-Includes felonies and misdemeanors - Acts of dishonesty: prior conviction required proof or admission of an act of dishonesty or false statement (e.g. perjury, fraud)
Impeachment by convictions more than 10 years old (felonies and misdemeanors)
- Not admissible unless: probative value substantially outweights unfair prejudice and adverse party is given notice
-Note: inverse of 403 balancing - Determining 10 year date: more than 10 years must have elapsed since date of conviction or date of release from confinement, whichever is later