impact of digital forms of communication Flashcards
Goffman - Digital communication and identity
Discusses the ‘presentation of self’ – He was writing in an era before digital communication but described HOW people ‘perform’ in a way that ensures they present a ‘desirable image’ of themselves.
When in front stage we wear a ‘mask’ not becoming a different person but a version of that individual. He wrote that even telephone conversations are insufficiently rich and lack the visual cues present in physical interaction.
Virtual identities might be just as real to users as non virtual identities. An avatar can be seen as a ‘mask’ used by online users. He claimed that we create multiple roles and multiple identities in everyday life. Links to the internet - people re take, edit and filter photos to post on social media.
Ellison - Digital communication and identity
Suggests that individuals can adopt multiple online personalities (different versions of self on different socials), and online activities often leave visible traces which can be captured, tracked, packaged and shared. These choices can tell us a lot about individuals and attitudes in wider society. These online identities can also sometimes impact on people’s offline lives in both negative and positive ways.
Boyle - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on age
Argues that each successive generation sees a greater use of and reliance on digital communication. He argues that this has led to a digital generation divide between the old, who are less likely to use new technologies, and the young, who are proficient and reliant on it in their day to day lives.
Garside - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on age
The introduction of broadband has created a generation of ‘digital natives’ - Leaving out the older generation and creating a young generation with poor social skills.
Berry - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on age
Researched older users of the internet and found that when explaining their reasons for not accessing the internet most of the participants explained that this was due to their lack of skills and/or lack of interest in doing so.
Postman - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on age
The internet leads to children and youths being exposed to adult content.
Palmer - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on age
Toxic parenting argues that parents rely on technology to occupy their children. Children then feel isolated and can’t relate to others face to face.
Garside - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
The introduction of broadband has created a generation of ‘digital natives’ - Beneficial to younger generation. Learn new skills/enhance learning.
Boyle - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
Young people can communicate and enhance relationships with peers through digital communication.
Shaw and Grant - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
Internet use was found to decrease loneliness and depression significantly, while perceived social support and self esteem increased significantly.
The Ofcom Report - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
Age has a considerable effect on the way digital communication is used: 98% or UK 16-35 year olds online. 62% of UK adults have a smartphone, 83% of UK adults are online. More 65+ online, 42% in 2014, vs 33% in 2012.
Berry - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
Although they state negative impacts - They do acknowledge that there are SOME websites for older people E.g. Finderday.com and SeniorMatch.com, even Facebook.
Clarke and Warren - Digital communication and POSITIVE effects on age
Active Ageing - Digital divide can help with this.
Digital generational divide (Age)
Between the young and old, old are less likely to use new technologies, and the young, who are proficient and reliant on it in their daily lives.
Mertens and D’Haenens - Digital communication and NEGATIVE effects on social class
Studied the digital divide in Brussels and found a clear link between class and internet usage. Found that the working and middle class used technology differently ‘Digital Underclass’. Lower classes use technology as a form of entertainment, whereas the middle classes used devices more to boost their knowledge and research.