III. Multiparty Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

3 People Injured. May they sue together as Co-πs?

A

Yes b/c their claims:
-Arise from the same T/O
AND
-Raise at least 1 Common Q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Necessary & Indispensable Parties

A

Why would a court force a non-party (absentee) to join the case?
-b/c the non-party is NECESSARY

Necessary (An absentee who meets ANY of these tests):

  • W/out A, court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties OR
  • A’s interest may be harmed if he is not joined OR
  • A claims an interest that subjects a party (usually ∆) to risk of multiple obligations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hint w/Joinder Rules

A

“C” = Crossclaim & Counterclaim
–> Claims between EXISTING PARTIES

“I” = Impleader & Intervention
–> Claims involving SOMEONE NEW TO THE CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Impleader (3-party practice)

A

∆ is bringing in someone new. New party is TPD.
-Usually for indemnity (TPD has to cover full claim) or contribution (TPD has to cover a pro-rata portion of the claim)

Steps:

  • ∆ files a 3rd Party complaint naming the TPD AND
  • Serves process on the TPD (must have PJ over)
    • Right to implead w/in 14 days of your answer. After, need court permission.

-Arrow can go back & forth between π & TPD if T/O underlying case

BUT remember –> SMJ for EACH CLAIM separately

  • Diversity
  • FQ
  • If neither then Supplemental (remember is it π? asserting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intervention

A

Non-party brings herself into the case.
Chooses to come in either as π (to assert a claim) or ∆ (to defend a claim)

Intervention of right and also permissive

REMEMBER SMJ for each claim (Diversity, FQ, Supplemental)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Class Action

A
Rep sues on behalf of group. 
Initial Req.
  -Numerosity 
  -Commonality 
  -Typicality 
  -Rep Adequate

Case MUST fit w/in one of 3 types:

(1) Prejudice
(2) Class seeks injunction or declaratory judgment b/c ∆ treated the class alike
(3) Damages (common Bar Q.)
- Big thing is NOTICE = Can opt out, they’ll be bound if they don’t, they can enter a separate appearance thru counsel

All members are bound by the judgment except those who opt out of a Type 3.

SMJ issue: As long as the Rep is diverse from ALL ∆s AND as long as the rep’s claim exceeds 75K, class action will invoke diversity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly