IIA Flashcards

1
Q

What term does Shalakany use to describe IIA’s process of discrimination?

A

Disciplinary bias - a preference of public/private divide over public regulatory framework.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What ideological assumption does Shalakany say underpins IIA?

A

There is a ‘binary opposition’ between the individual and society, and that imperatively contracts are to be honoured rather than breached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What three assumptions guide the ideology of IIA?

A
  1. Arbitration is suited for resolving contractual, not political disputes.
  2. Parties assumed to be equal, rather than ‘coercive exercise of power between unequals.’
  3. Arbitration is concerned with property rights, not issues of sovereignty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Shalakany quotes [?] to say what about the assumption of equals?

A

Felix Cohen, saying it is “transcendental nonsense” to refer to multinational companies, with profits exceeding the GDPs of countries thy contract with, as being equals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is the US District Court decision in Texaco case exceptional?

A

Referring to the ‘Act of State doctrine’, the Court said nationalisation is not arbitrable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Professor Dupuy say about the ‘contrat administratif’ in the Libyan Oil case?

A

Referring to that doctrine of the state exercising coercive power, Dupuy deemed it ‘inapplicable’ in either national or international law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The case of Libya v American Oil Co (LIAMCO) concerned how much in damages, following transgression of what principle by what process?

A

$80m following nationalisation, which even if lawful, was a source of liability, given that it transgresses against the ‘inviolable principle’ of property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Kuwait v Aminoil differ?

A

Though the damages were earmarked as $83m following nationalisation of oil resources, the tribunal said the ‘changed circumstances’ of it becoming a post colonial state (like Libya) meant that it enjoyed ‘special advantages.’ These advantages rendered the stabilisation clause no longer absolute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In which case were individuals able to be admissible parties for a claim?

A

Abaclat (ICSID): 30k Italian investors in Argentina.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the ICSID’s stated aim?

A

To “strengthen partnership between countries in cause of economic development… to stimulate flow of international private capital by overcoming fear of arbitrary and uncompensated expropriation.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which countries have withdrawn from ICSID?

A

Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, possibly Argentina; because ‘ICSID is biased towards investors.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Sornorajah say about this emerging field of law?

A

That there is no settled law of international investment protection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What early case states the philosophy of free trade? What did it lead to?

A

Vitoria - law should further free movement of trade globally - equal treatment for foreign traders.
It led to gunboat diplomacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What event precipitated US challenges against Latin America?

A

During junta and mob attacks against general populace and property, both national and American property was damaged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the US cases v Latin America, what were the views of Calvo and Cordell Hull?

A

Calvo (Latin American jurist): considered it fair that American factory owners, suffering losses through burning, should receive equal treatment with native property owners.

Hull: foreign owners should be treated favourably. It was irrelevant that local owners would lose out on compensation; it was fair and adequate to hold such. He says compensation should be prompt, adequate and effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What political initiative was invoked by postcolonial states when nationalising?

A

The ‘New International Economic Order’ cited the UNGA Resolution: Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources.

17
Q

Despite allegations of corruption, what was held in case of [?]?

A

In Westinghouse v Philippines, contract was upheld as being for ‘benefit of people.’

18
Q

What did L Asquith say in the Abu Dhabi Award case? What does Anghie say this means?

A

“Some of its [English] rules are in my view so firmly grounded in reason, as to form part of this broad jurisprudence - this ‘modern law of nature.’”

Anghie: the law of Third World state is in effect selectively replaced by law of England.

19
Q

What cases espouse principle of compensation following nationalisation, done without discrimination and non-arbitrarily?

A
  1. Chorzów Factory case [1928] “It is general conception of law that every violation of engagement involves obligation to make reparations.
  2. ELSI Case ICJ: what amounts to a taking can be direct or indirect (return on liquidation).
  3. Methanex v US: claim brought on basis of possible loss in share value as being a ‘taking.’
20
Q

What does Sornorajah say arbitrators have achieved? What is his cynical statement?

A

They have grounded IIA in a commercial approach, without regard for international law.

“Large law firms see this area as a lucrative field of practice. They may seek to promote rules that cater to their interests in maintaining volatility in the area, ensuring wide bases of liability and a continuation of arbitration as the means of settlement of investment disputes.”

21
Q

What is the definition of investment (with reference to cases)?

A

It does not need:

  1. To be profitable (Biwater Gauff v Tanzania)
  2. To include transfer of capital to host state (Fedax NV v Venezuela)
  3. To contribute to economic development of state (LESI SpA v Algeria) HOWEVER cf Patrick Mitchell v DRC, in which held development must occur.
22
Q

What does ‘fair and equitable treatment’ mean?

A

That the legitimate expectations of the investor at the time of contracting are met.

23
Q

What does ‘full protection and security’ mean?

A
  1. A due diligence standard - “the fact that the state did not protect property of its own citizens is no excuse” - American Manufacturing v Zaire.
  2. “No arbitrary or discriminating measures impairing the investment.” - ELSI ICJ case
24
Q

What is significance of Impreglio v Argentina?

A

The tribunal allows claimant to benefit from MFN clause.

25
Q

In what case was the concession agreement upheld?

A

Anglo-Iranian Oil Case - concession shall not be annulled by government and terms contained therein shall not be altered either by general or specific legislation in future, or by administrative measures or any other acts whatsoever of the executive authorities.

26
Q

In what case does the regulatory chill appear apparent for purpose of environment?

A

Compania del Desarollo de Santa Rosa v Costa Rica - intention of legislation (environmental protection) irrelevant, only the effect.

27
Q

Can lost profits be awarded where operation has not commenced?

A

According to Metalclad v

Mexico, no - however, compensation must nonetheless be paid.

28
Q

Why is Methanex (Canada corpn.) v US significant for environmental law?

A

“Non-discriminatory regulations in public interest (eg environment) will almos never be considered expropriation.” A “bona fide” regulation from an equal power.

29
Q

What sorts of charges were made and found against Argentine Republic in their case vs Sempra Energy?

A

“Depriving investor of control over the investment, managing day-to-day operations of the company…”

30
Q

Solanes quotes Kessides regarding the effects of privatisation. What does K say?

A

“these [regulatory] models have rarely been adapted to the political and institutional features common to poorer countries, including lack of checks and balances, low credibility, widespread corruption and regulatory capture, limited technical expertise, and weak auditing, accounting, and tax systems … As a result such efforts have had limited success — or been outright failures”

31
Q

What is one of hypocrisies as identified by CEO?

A

Arbitrators take an expansive approach when interpreting phrases to do with investment, yet take a restrictive approach towards anything that considers human rights.

32
Q

What is the significance of J Schwebel in US?

A

He, as part of government advisory committee, supported a return to 1994 BITs, which are far more investor-friendly than the proposed BITs format as proposed when Obama took office.