Idiographic And Nomothetic Approaches Flashcards
Explain the idiographic approach.
Focussed on the individual and emphasises the unique personal experience of human nature. They favour qualitative research methods.
What are 3 research methods that use an idiographic approach?
Case studies
Particular observations
Unstructured interviews
What are 2 theories based on the idiographic approach?
Humanistic
Case studies like tan, Little Hans
Give strengths of the idiographic approach.
- detailed insight into behaviour which nomothetic can’t offer
- useful in discoveries eg HM, KF challenged MSMs assumptions that STM is unitary
- important in showing benefits of qualitative research
- higher in validity and acknowledge the interaction between researcher and participant (reflexivity)
Give weaknesses of the idiographic approach.
- no practical applications therefore limiting usefulness eg no therapies, so unhelpful in real world
- not scientific - doesn’t meet criteria for science eg can’t predict and control behaviour, can’t repeat case studies
- lacking in controlled variables, poor population validity
Explain the nomothetic approach.
Concerned with establishing general laws based on the study or large groups of people. They favour quantitative research methods.
Give 3 research methods used by the idiographic approach
Meta- analysis
Questionnaires
Experiments
Give 2 examples of theories based on the nomothetic approach.
Bem
Learning theory
Give strengths of the nomothetic approach.
- highly scientific: replicable, high levels of control, quantitative data allows analysis of patterns and trends
- increased status of psychology as a science
- useful practical applications - therapies like SSRIs (however never 100% success rate suggesting individual differences)
Give weaknesses of the nomothetic approach.
- overlooks interesting individual reasons for behaviour to there may be difference circumstances for why people behave in the same way.
- over simplifies humans
- can’t explain cultural differences. Assumes humans are driven by the same motivations do important cultural differences are overlooked. Eg attachments.
- treats groups as homogenous eg all men and women
Why would an interactionist approach towards being nomothetic/idiographic be better?
In realty many approaches draw upon both methods. For example cognitive psychology - case studies draw conclusions about people. Good to understand human behaviour.