idiographic and nomothetic approaches Flashcards
the idiographic approach
- focus on the individual and emphasises unique personal experience
- favours qualitative research methods, such as case studies, unstructured interviews and thematic analysis (they allow an in-depth insight)
- don’t seek to formulate laws or generalise results to others
freud’s use of case studies
- he conducted detailed investigations into his patients lives to help them overcome their psychological disorders
- although freud tried to make generalisations from his case studies, they are still seen as idiographic as each persons disorder derived from their unique experiences
give a strength of an idiographic approach
1/1
the use of a case study is a powerful tool for evaluating psychological theories. for example, the case of patient kf exposed a limitation of the msm, providing evidence that our stm is made of at least 2 components (visual and auditory memory), not 1 as originally proposed. a single case study can lead to further research into a particular phenomenon, such as memory, which then contributes to the development of new theories which further our understanding of behaviour
counter the previous point
although case studies can highlight flaws in psychological theories and lead to further research, the method to conducting them are often highly time consuming. for example, freud’s case study of little hans consisted of almost 150 pages of quotes from his father and detailed descriptions of events in his life. although freud creates universal theories of personality development during childhood, these were based on limited and unrepresentative case studies that would be discredited by multiple psychologists
give a limitation of an idiographic approach
1/1
the idiographic approach lacks the ability to establish general laws or predict human behaviour, limiting its practical value in diagnosing and treating psychological disorders. furthermore, psychologists criticise the idiographic approach as unscientific, its emphasis on in-depth data collection over making justifiable generalisations contradicts the central aim of science
the nomothetic approach
- establish general laws based on studies of large groups of people
- use statistical (quantitative) techniques to analyse data, e.g. experiments, correlations, psychometric testing and other quantitative methods
biological psychologists
- take a nomothetic approach when explaining psychological disorders such as depression and ocd
- they implicate biological factors and use biological therapies to treat all patients
behaviourists
pavlov and skinner conducted animal studies to establish laws of learning to generalise to humans and other animals
cognitive psychologists
atkinson and shiffrin developed general laws like the msm which they believed could be generalised to everyone
social psychologists
milgram and asch created general conclusions that situational factors are responsible for obedience and conformity
psychopathology
classification manuals classify people with psychological disorders based on specific symptoms
give a strength of a nomothetic approach
1/1
unlike the idiographic approach, the nomothetic approach is viewed as more scientific. it relies on quantitative methods, controlled measurement and the ability to predict behaviour, all of which are considered strengths. furthermore, its controlled methods allow for replication to assess the reliability of findings, contributing to psychology’s recognition as a scientific discipline. this approach utilises the development of theories and empirical testing, which are both key features of science
give a limitation of a nomothetic approach
1/1
some psychologists argue that the nomothetic approach focuses too much on quantitative data and statistical analysis, causing it to lose sight of the person as a whole. they also claim that this approach only provides a superficial explanation for human behaviour. for instance, milgrams research showed that 65% of participants fully obeyed an authority figure and administered a 450V electric shock when told to do so. however, these results don’t explain the specific reasons behind each persons obedience, which may vary hugely depending on individual circumstances
counter the previous point
however, idiographic researchers argue that his findings apply to groups and not individuals. allport, who introduced the term idiographic, stated that only by understanding individuals can we accurately predict their behaviour. milgram’s research laid a foundation for social psychologists to further investigate why people obey authority
a combined approach
- holt (1967) argues that separating idiographic and nomothetic approaches is flawed, and instead proposes that they complement (rather than contradict) each other
- for example, cognitive psychologists often develop general laws about cognitive processes (nomothetic) but also utilise idiographic methods like case studies
- many studies utilise both approaches, highlighting that the distinction between the 2 may not hold much significance
- psychologists should choose the method they employ based on the nature of the research question