ICS 4 Flashcards
Soc 1 for Service Org
IC over financial reporting - controls @ service org that are likely to be be relevant to user IC over financial reporting
Reports resticted to mgmt of service org, user entity and indepenent auditor
Soc 2 for Service Or
Trust Service Criterai - seucirty, availablity, or processing integrityof a system, or the confidentialty or privacy of inforamation processed by the system. Reports are intended for those who have sufficient knowledge and understading of service org, services provided, and systems used. Mgmt and service auditor should agree on users of report
Soc 3
Trust Services Criteria for General Use Report - controls were effective to provide ressonable assurance that service commitmentsand sytem requirements were achieved based on pplicable trsut services criteria. Report does not include description of system, test of controls or results - for general user
Type 1 Report
fairness of the presentation of mgmt description of system and design of controls as a specific date. (Soc 1/2)
Type 2 Report
fairness of the presentation of mgmt description of system and design and operating effecivness of controls for a period. (Soc 1/2) SOC 3
Type 1 report contents
MGmt description of system, written assertation by mgmt that description fairly presents system that was deigned/implemented and controls related to control objects state in mgm description were suitably designed to achieved control objectives. - Expressed opinion
Type 2 report contents
MGmt description of system, written assertation by mgmt that description fairly presents system that was deigned/implemented and controls related to control objects state in mgm description were suitably designed to achieved control objectives. - Expressed opinion anddescription of test of controls and reuslts
5 categories of the Trust services
CAPPS
Confidentiality
Availablity
Processing Integrity
Privacy
Security
Application and Use of trust services
- SOC for cyber security engagement (security, availablity, and control)
- SOC 2 Engagement -
- SOC 3 Engagement
Sutiabilty of design and operating effectivness of controls of an entity over one or more sysyems relevant to trust cateogiries
COSO Control Env.
Control from prospective of board/mgmt through integirty, ethics, structure, enviornment of accountability
COSO Risk Assessment
identifying risks, considerations for potential fraud, changes that may impact IC.
COSO Control Activities
Control activities implemented and designed to ensure the proper applicationof polices and procedures that help ensure mgmt directives and control objectives are met.
trust services supplemental crtiera
logical/physical access controls, system operations, change management, risk mitigation
COSO Information and Communication
obtaining, gathering, and controlling information and communication
COSO Monitoring
conduct ongoing evaluations of control activities and communciate internal control deficiences
Add’l criteria for Availablity
ability to ensure systems are continousy available as needed by maintinaingnd monitoring processing cabilities, identifying and responding to threats, and ensuring a recovery planis in place and tested.
Add’l criteria for Processing
Consideration related to creating, using, and communicating quality info so objectives will be met regarding product/service specs, controls for completeness and accuracy, productivity, and system specs.
Add’l criteria for Confidentiality
ensuring confidential info is handled approproiatly
Add’l critieria for Privacy
privacy related to collecting personal data, obtaining consent, using only as intended, managing access, discolsing policies to third parties and individuals, maintaining complete and accurate records, monitoring and encofcing practices in place.
When forming an opinion in SOC engagement what should auditor evaluate?
sufficiency and appropriatness of evidence, whether uncorrected misstatements, individual or in accurate are material.
In SOC engagement what is opinion about?
subject matter is in accordance with (or based on) the criteria, in all material respects, or the assertion is failry stated in all material respects.
Opinion foucses on?
Fair presentation of mgmt description of service orgs system, suitabilty of design of controls, effective operation of controls stated (Type 2)
SOC Unmodified opinion
In all material respects based on the criteria described in management assertation;
1. Mgmt description is fairly presented. SOC2 “in accordance with description criteria”.
2. Controls stated suitabily designed - SOC2 “provide rasonabel assurance that serv. org service commitmenets and system requirements were achieved based on trust services criteria”.
3. Controls operated effectvily (Type 2) - SOC2 - “to provide resonable assurance..”
SOC and User entity controls
If application of complementary user entity controls is necessary to achieve the control objective stated by mgmt, statement to that effect
When would you modify an opinion
When unable to obtain suffiicent appropraite evidence (in all material respects)or subject matter is not in accorance with criteri in all material respects