Iceland Flashcards
What does Islendingabok not mention regarding the identity of the first icelandic settlers
Ari doesn’t mention that many men sailed from the Norse settlements in the British Isles and brought celtic slaves with them
Genetic data on Icelandic men’s mitochondrial DNA suggests 61.5% of Iceland’s early female population were of British ethnicity, whereas 80% of the male settlers were Scandinavian.
Islendingabok doesn’t mention this at all, as he wants to stress the noble origins of Iceland as opposed to the full story
Who was the colonisation led by?
The colonisation was led by well-to-do chieftains and farmers from Norway and the British isles
Why did people move to Iceland?
The Norse colonisation of Iceland was an extension of the Viking settlement in the Faeroes and the British Isles; Orkney turned out to be such a successful settlement that it was natural for people to continue to search for a better life.
They weren’t so much pushed out by unfavourable circumstances; they were pulled by the prospect of a better life
How does Landnamabok tell us Iceland was colonised
. Norwegian named Naddodd is driven off course when sailing to the Faeroes
. Then a Swede named Garthar sets off to find the island mentioned by Naddodd; he does and winters there
. Norwegian named Floki tries to live there, but loses his livestock
. Then eventually settlement succeeds
What are the issues with Landnamabok’s account of the colonisation?
. It uses typological history and reflects the bible
. For example, first settlers are brothers named Ingolf and Hjorlief, who are opposites in every way– the account is too balanced, perhaps compiler thought this would make it seem more legit?
Who does Ari say was the first settler?
Ingolf Arnarson
Arrived in Iceland c.873 with family and some dependants and settled in Rejkjavik area; archaeology confirms this was one of the earliest settlements
Why did Ingolf settle in the Reykjavik area
. Walruses
. Little bays were suitable for sheep grazing
What are some ecological issues with Iceland’s climate/ environment?
. The central plateau is an inhospitable volcanic desert.
. Distinct lack of trees — meant Icelanders were dependant on others for wood and transportation and meant their houses were made mostly of turf unlike elsewhere in Scandinavia
When did the ‘period of settlement’ last from?
c.870–c.930
What was the ‘second phase’ of settlement?
When the land of lesser quality was divided and sold to the second generation of immigrants or settlers
How were Icelandic farms organised?
Tended to be two or three households– due to the perceived need to utilise as many resources as possible
—Their economic base was wide and varied
In reality, how egalitarian was early Iceland?
It was a land of several hundred powerful farmers, each in control of a considerable number of people on his own estate who were bound to him through ties of estate ownership
What is the romantic stereotype of Iceland?
The romantic, nationalist stereotype of Iceland is that it was a land of independent farmers with equal status
And that commonwealth iceland was very democratic for its time, but modern scholarship varies widely on this.
Main reason (probably) why no king ever emerged in Iceland
Because everyone knew that nobody was of royal blood and had any claim to kingship.
What was the result of Iceland not having a king?
Meant it was decentralised and without a head
This resulted in a degree of fluidity of custom and tradition
List 4 things in which power came from in Iceland
Owning land
Being wealthy
Having the control of natural resources
The ability to gather and maintain supporters
3 points about Iceland’s relationship with Norway
. King Harald Fairhair imposed a tax on people voyaging to Iceland, although this is not described as unreasonable
. In 1030, Icelanders were negotiating with Olaf Haraldsson about their rights in Norway and the rights of Norwegians in Iceland
. There was also a certain economic dependance on Norwegian merchants for things, such as timber
Why did the first wave of settlers have such a strong advantage over the second wave of settlers?
They had the best land and the largest estates
They also had a clear social advantage because transactions were not neutral so the buyer of the land became in a position of obligation to the seller who had done them a favour by selling to them.
What do the graves from the early period of settlement suggest
They suggest the settlers suffered from general material poverty— there are no signs of political or economic power being expressed in terms of rich or visible burials.
We can presume that there WERE rich individuals, but that in the early period items were needed more in life than in death.
Compared to Norway, how was early Iceland as a society
The Icelanders were very much the poor cousins of Norway; the new society was operating on a lower technological level because it lacked specialised skills and material symbols of power.
What was Iceland’s social system during the settlement period based on
It was based on the fact that the first arrivals took the best land and had time to build up their herds and settle their land with dependants
THIS PUT THEM IN A POSITION OF AUTHORITY AND POLITICAL POWER
How did the first settlers defend the land they had acquired
they defended their position by surrounding the area around them with their dependents and so they brought newcomers to settle on the marginal bits of their own land.
Instead of a king, what did the Icelanders bring with them
They recreated the system of assemblies (thing)
They had to work out a new system which suited their mixed background and new circumstances
what were things
gatherings of local high freemen, presided over by local chieftains
What are the 3 contemporary sources for the Icelandic commonwealth
Adam of Bremen
Skaldic poetry
Islendingabok