ic5 - selection and management of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF (SPAF) Flashcards
what is the difference between valvular and non valvular AF
valvular AF includes moderate to severe mitral stenosis, prosthetic heart valves
non valvular AF is AF with other valvular heart lesions
compare the agents used for valvular vs non valvular AF
use VKA for valvular, use DOACs for non valvular
should OAC be used for SPAF
yes if mCHA2SD2-VASc score is not = 0 for males and not = 1 for females
what is the preferred OAC for SPAF
DOAC > VKA
compare the scorings for CHA2SD2-VASc and mCHA2SD2-VASc
CHA2SD2-VASc:
congestive HF [+1]
HTN [+1]
Age (>75) [+2]
DM [+1]
prev stroke or TIA or thromboembolism [+2]
vascular disease (prev MI or PAD or aortic plate) [+1]
65-74 [+1]
female [+1]
mCHA2SD2-VASc:
congestive HF [+1]
HTN [+1]
DM [+1]
prior stroke/ TIA [+2]
vascular disease [+1]
65-74 [+1]
Age (>75) [+2]
what is meant by time in therapeutic range (TTR)
it means the time spent in therapeutic INR range
consider factors favouring DOACs vs factors favouring warfarin
factors favouring warfarin: pts who have at least 6/10 INR in therapeutic range, pts with moderate to severe hepatic or renal impairment, pts unable to tolerate s/e of DOACs (epigastric discomfort), pts with clinically significant ddi to DOACs
factors favouring DOACs: pts w less than 6/10 INR in therapeutic range when on warfarin, pts reluctant for more freq monitoring or no access, warfarin has narrower therapeutic index thus req more freq monitoring, warfarin assoc with greater deterioration of renal func, warfarin assoc with neuropathy and vascular calcification, DOACs have simpler dosing and safer bc lesser major bleeding, DOACs have significantly lesser ddi
what scoring is used to measure bleeding risk and what are the scoring componnets
HASBLED (max score of 9)
HTN [1]
abnormal renal func (dialysis, transplant, SCr >200mcmol/L) [1]
abnormal liver func (cirrhosis, bilirubin >2x, AST or ALT or ALP >3x)
stroke (hx of) [1]
bleeding (hx of and risk) [1]
labile INR (>6/10 above target or high or unstable INR) [1]
elderly (>65) [1]
drugs (antiPLT, NSAIDs etc) [1]
alcohol (>8u/w) [1]
is HASBLED scoring correlated with actual bleeding
no
what are the tx goals for AF
ABC
avoid stroke -> identify low risk pt, offer stroke prevention if at least one risk factor (or based on mCHA2SD2-VASc), decide on OAC
better sx control
cardiovascular and other comorbs or risk factors
what is LAA occlusion and is it more beneficial than anticoagulants
watchman device inserted into left atrium but anticoagulants better efficacy
list examples of antithrombotics
antithrombotics comprises of both antiPLT and anticoagulants
antiPLT: [PO] aspirin, dipyridamole, P2Y12i like clopidogrel and ticagrelor [IV] glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor like eptifibatide
anticoagulant: [PO] DOACs like dabigatran and rivaroxaban and apixaban, VKA like warfarin [IV] heparin (LMWH like enoxaparin and UFH)
compare the dosing between OACs for SPAF
dabigatran: [for SPAF] 150mg BD, 110mg BD older than 80, high risk bleeding or if concom PGPi [CrCl 30-50] same as SPAF [CrCl 15-30] c/i [CrCl <15] c/i
rivaroxaban: [for SPAF] 20mg QD [CrCl 30-50] 15mg QD [CrCl 15-30] caution [CrCl <15] c/i
apixaban: [for SPAF] 5mg BD, 2.5mg BD if any two of following - older than 80, weight below 60kg, SCr more than 1.5mg/dL or 132.6mmol/L [CrCl 30-50] same as SPAF [CrCl 15-30] 2.5mg BD [HD] same as SPAF
edoxaban: [for SPAF] 60mg QD, 30mg QD if any of the following - CrCl 30-50, weight below 60kg, concom verapamil or quinidine or dronedarone [CrCl 30-50] 30mg QD [CrCl 15-30] 30mg QD [CrCl <15] not rec
warfarin: individualised dosing
what eqn do you use to estimate renal func for dosing of OAC and what is the eqn
cockroft-gault eqn
CrCl = [(140-age)(BW)]/[SCr(72)(88.4)] (0.85 if female)
**note SCr in micromol/L (/88.4) to convert to mg/dL
what are the diff BW and when are they used in the cockroft-gault eqn
TBW for underweight
IBW for normal weight
adjBW for obese (0.4 x TBW)
calc range of CrCl for obese and morbidly obese using TBW and IBW
typically use TBW to calc dosing of DOAC
would CrCl be of higher or lower value than GFR and why
CrCl would be of higher value because Cr is being secreted by proximal tubule (in addition to being filtered by glomerulus)
what is the CKD-EPI eqn mostly used for and for whom might using GFR be less accurate in estimating kidney function
calc GFR to classify CKD
for DM with high GFR, pregnancy, unusual body mass (obese, severely malnourished, amputee etc)
how to stage CKD
GFR cat [CKD stage] {GFR value}
G1 [1] {>90}
G2 [2] {60-89}
G3a [3] {45-59}
G3b [3] {30-44}
G4 [4] {15-29}
G5 [5] {<15}
what are some special populations to take note when choosing antithrombotics and what are the considerations for these special populations
elderly: apixaban
BW 60-120kg: lower BW requires dose adjustments for apixaban and edoxaban, higher BW use rivaroxaban and apixaban
what is the frequency for monitoring and follow up
first follow up in 1 month
after first follow up: q4m if >75yo or frail OR q”CrCl/10”m if CrCl <60ml/min OR immediately in case of intercurrent conditions esp if potential impact on renal or hepatic func
what should be checked during regular follow up
bleeding events, s/e, adherence (inform about monitoring for minor bleedings eg. gum bleed epistaxis), changes in co-medication (OTC), blood sampling q12m or as per TCU interval, reassess HASBLED or CHA2SD2-VASc score, assessing optimal DOAC and correct dosing
which DOACs are cyp450, P-gp, BCRP and OATP substrates
cyp450: rivaroxaban (50%), apixaban (20-25%)
P-gp: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban
BCRP: rivaroxaban, apixaban
OATP: dabigatran (weak), rivaroxaban, edoxaban (weak)