IBS2018 Flashcards
What are the 5 P’s in Mintzberg (1987)?
- Plan
- Intended strategies.
- Plans made purposefully/consciously and in advance
- Ploy
- A maneuver to outsmart a competitor
- Fx. A strategic maneuver where a corporation threatens its competitor, that it will built/expand its plant capacity to discourage a competitor from doing so.
- A maneuver to outsmart a competitor
- Pattern
- Realized strategies
- A consistency in behavior becomes the strategy perceived by the outside world.
- Position
- Small number of desirable strategies (otherwise similar to plan)
- A means of locating an organization in an environment.
- The “position” definition allows us to open up the concept of strategy to “n-persons” games (many players instead of head-to-head)
- Perspective
- Sort of individual factors looking inside the heads of the collective strategist of the organization
- You position the corporation in your PERCEIVED world
- Perspectives are more immutable when they have been established, meaning that they get so deeply ingrained in the behavior of an organization that the associated beliefs can become subconscious in the minds of its members
Into which 5 categories does Professor Pogrebnyakov summarize the Mintzberg (1987) text?
- Plan
- Pattern
- Position
- Individual
- Configuration and Learning
(Hence, you do not see “Ploy” and “Perspective” form the 5 ps)
What is meant by Strategy as a PLAN and which theories and frameworks are linked to this view of strategy? PLAN (Mintzberg 1987)
Strategy as a plan
- Intended strategies.
- Plans made purposefully/consciously and in advance
- Based on a fit between internal and external capabilities (SWOT)
Theories and frameworks
- SWOT analysis
- Regional strategies (Ghermawat 2005)
- Scenario planning
What is meant by Strategy as a POSITION and which theories and frameworks are linked to this view of strategy? POSITION (Mintzberg 1987)
Strategy as a position
- Similar to “plan” in most ways BUT
- Only a small number of desirable strategies
Theories and frameworks
- Generic strategies
- Five Forces (Porter 1979, 1980)
- Environment/Industry affects strategy choice
What is meant by Strategy as a PATTERN and which theories and frameworks is linked to this view of strategy? PATTERN (Mintzberg 1987)
Strategy as a PATTERN
- REALIZED strategies
- A consistency in behavior becomes the strategy perceived by the outside world.
- Emergent, incremental
- Small actions and decisions made by many people lead to a patterned strategy, although these people do not see their actions as “strategic”
Theories and frameworks
- Internationalization process model (Mintzberg 1987, Mintzberg, Ahlstrand and Lampel 2009)
What are deliberate and emergent strategies? (Figure 1, Mintzberg) (Mintzberg 1987)
Intended strategy:
- strategy as a plan
→ may end up either realized (deliberate strategy) or unrealized.
Emergent strategy:
- strategy as a pattern
→ patterns developed in the absence of intentions
What is meant by Strategy as a CONFIGURATION AND LEARNING and which theories and frameworks is linked to this view of strategy? CONFIGURATION AND LEARNING (Mintzberg 1987)
Strategy as a CONFIGURATION AND LEARNING
- The role of “strategy” is to maintain stability and recognize the need for major transformation
- The company’s strengths and weaknesses should be determined IN THE CONTEXT OF A PROBLEM
- It is hard to know in advance whether a competence will be a strength or a weakness for a particular strategy
Theories and frameworks
- Resource-based view
- Dynamic capabilities
- Organizational structure and strategy
What is meant by INDIVIDUAL FACTORS in Strategy and which theories and frameworks is linked to this view? Individual factors (Mintzberg 1987)
Individual factors in Strategy
- Strategy is created or expressed by the leader and his/her intuition, judgment and experience
- Strategy is a guiding idea/a sense of direction
- We adapt along the way as details emerge
Theories and frameworks
- Entrepreneurship
- Heuristics and biases in decision-making
What is an MNC?
- An organization that “Owns and controls operations in several countries” (Pugel)
- Has “direct production and generally direct business activities abroad” (Letto-Gillies)
- “Any public company that engages in international business activities” (Cullen & Parboteeath)
What affects company internationalization? = DEM (Hitt et al. 2016)
- Distance in culture and institutions between home and target country
- Experience with internationalization of the corporation
- Management or founders international experience
And… Born global companies
What is globalization? (slide review class)
- Convergence of tastes
- Firms launch global products
- “The world is flat”
What drives globalization? = TLGGP (Hitt et al. 2016)
-
Technology
- Reduce distance ⇒ increased use and expansion
- Reach customers and/or manage operations
-
Liberalization
- Trade agreements
- Trade blocks (Mercosur, SADC, NAFTA, ASEAN) and WTO
- Trade agreements
-
Global products and consumer tastes
- Enabling standardized products
-
Global competition
- Companies entering foreign markets
- Political changes
What opposes globalization? (Hitt et al. 2016)
- Technology
- Increasingly different internet governance
- Privacy shields such as China
- Increasingly different internet governance
- De-liberalization of trade and resource movements
- Stalled WTO Doha round
- Increase in bilateral trade agreements
- Political changes
- Brexit, Trump
- The populist backlash a reminder that the rewards of globalization are not evenly distributed
- Land, cultural or religious disputes leading to war
- Brexit, Trump
What does the idea of exploitation towards exploration say? (Hitt et al. 2016)
We see a growing trend from exploitation of the host country towards EXPLORATION
Exploration as in search for new capabilities
- More and more R&D centers abroad
- REVERSE knowledge transfer
- Increased likelihood of full-control entry modes over share-control entry modes
- Especially as managers international experience increases
What are globalonies and who are their enemy? (Ghermawat 2017)
The term “Globaloney” has been given to strong believers in globalization and its benefits.
The enemy is nationalists or the populist movements seen with Brexit and Trump. These serve as a reminder that the rewards of globalization are not evenly distributed.
What is meant by semi-globalization? (Ghermawat 2017)
Although FDI inflows and outflows and international trade has increased with double-digit multiples in a matter of decades, not much of it is global.
- Most is regional (EU, NAFTA, Asia)
- Fortune 500 companies account for 50 % of world trade. FEW are global. Most are regional even among the biggest MNCs.
*What is the relationship between digitization and globalization?* (Germawat 2017)
Technology (ICT) does enhance globalization
BUT technology:
- Can enhance political conflicts
- Private citizens data
- Political espionage
- Digital warfare
- Can work against globalization
- 3D printing, E-education and robotics
- And is INSUFFICIENT
- China’s internet shield
- 2005-2017 Internet traffic and e-commerce grew 45x BUT only 2-4x in international terms
Furthermore, even these already quite poor numbers (on the level of international digital traffic) are biased as it is linked to physical flows (Expats, travelers, migrants)
=
The country pairs with the largest telephone traffic also rank among the top migration routes
What is multicountry competition?
- Each country market is self-contained
- Different preferences and competitive positions
- Competition is in each market independent from the other markets the MNC operates in
Example:
- Dairy products
What is global competition?
- Prices and competitive positions strongly interlinked across markets
- Same competitors in many markets
- MNC’s advantages stems from worldwide operations
Examples
- SMARTPHONES; APPLE, SAMSUNG, HTC,
- Softdrinks: Coca Cola, Pepsi
How do multicountry competition and global competition differ?
What is the difference between global business and global competition? (Hamel and Prahalad 1985)
- Global Competition: pursuing global brand and distribution channels. You battle global companies
- Global Business: investments are made to achieve scale and cost efficiency not available in the home market.
How do product and competitive strategies differ?
-
Product strategies
- Choices regarding a company’s product line in different geographical markets
-
Competitive strategies
- Analyzing sources of competitive advantage and locating parts of the value chain in markets that offer the best opportunities for the company to enhance its competitive position
How does the classic product strategy matrix look and what is on each axis?
The question is between local responsiveness (tailoring to local tastes) and standardization (global integration)
- Product mix
- Product adaptation
Coca Cola not solely local responsiveness as they always have the classic Coca Cola, but they adapt with other products, fx. Diet Cherry Vanilla Cola and other soft drinks.
If consumers have similar tastes and the markets are similar, do we have a good case for global integration? (Devinney, Midgley & Venaik 2000 on slide)
Not necessarily.
Depends on
- MNC organizational systems and capabilities
- Ability to coordinate multinational strategies and operations
- Product characteristics; bulky and cheap vs. small and expensive
When should one pursue global integration and when should one pursue local responsiveness?
What are the 4 sources of corporate competitive advantage presented by Hamel and Prahalad (1985)?
SALG
- Scale-volume from internationalization
- Access to supply and distribution channels
- Location advantages
- Global brand
Provide examples of 3 global competitive strategies, the rationales for each and how these are achieved
-
Defend domestic position
- Companies trying to defend their domestic position are often shortsighted about the strategic intentions of their competitors.
-
Rationale
- Gain ability to retaliate
- How
- Attacking competitors on their offering or acquiring competitors. Having a strong home market is important to save up reserves that can be used to attack abroad = Domestic market is used as cash-cow.
-
Overcome national fragmentation
- Companies expand geographically to built the sales volume necessary for world-scale investment in R&D and manufacturing while gaining access to local producers and market knowledge.
-
Rationale
- Rationalize R&D and production
- How
- Distribute decision-making among subsidiaries
-
Build global presence
-
Rationale
- Achieve capability to make and sell globally
- How
- Cross-subsidizing to reduce competitors margins + gain first-mover advantage
- What is cross-subsidizing?: When a global company uses financial resources accumulated in one part of the world to fight a competitive battle in another market
- Cross-subsidizing to reduce competitors margins + gain first-mover advantage
-
Rationale
What are the 5 different regional strategies? (Ghermawat 2005)
-
Home-based strategy
- Keeping the entire value chain besides sales in home region
-
Portfolio strategy
- Setting up or acquiring operations outside home region that report directly to home-base
-
Hub strategy
- Building regional bases that provide shared services.
- Spreading fixed costs across a region
- Regional HQ is NOT enough. You need a regional strategy to be hub.
- *Platform strategy
- Interregional spread of costs
- You do not customize in the beginning of the manufacturing process. Instead, you have a platform that serves interregionally. You use the platform to customize to regions.
- *Mandate strategy
- Awarding some regions with broad mandates to supply particular products or perform particular roles for the whole organization
What is the Home-based regional strategy? (Ghermawat 2005)
-
Home-based strategy
- Keeping the entire value chain besides sales in home region
- Work well when the economics of concentration outweigh the economics of dispersion (e.g. Zara).
What is the Portfolio regional strategy? (Ghermawat 2005)
- Portfolio strategy
- Setting up or acquiring operations outside home region that report directly to home-base
- Companies that adopt a portfolio strategy often struggle to deal with rivals in non-home regions. That’s largely because portfolio strategies offer limited scope for letting regional - as opposed to local or global - considerations influence what happens on the ground at the local level.
What is the Hub regional strategy? (Ghermawat 2005)
- Hub strategy
- Building regional bases that provide shared services for the region
- Spreading fixed costs across a region
- Regional HQ is NOT enough. You need a regional strategy to be hub.
- Companies seeking to add value at the regional level frequently begin by adopting this strategy.
- In its purest form, a hub strategy is simply a multiregional version of the home base strategy.
- The challenge in executing a hub strategy is achieving the right balance between customization and standardization.
*What is the Platform regional strategy?* (Ghermawat 2005)
- Platform strategy
- Interregional spread of costs = spread fixed costs across several regions
- Regions add customizations
- You do not customize in the beginning of the manufacturing process. Instead, you have a platform that serves interregionally. You use the platform to customize to regions.
Example: Volkswagen produces a platform (part of the car) in a location and distributes around the world where the cars are finalized.
*What is the Mandate regional strategy?* (Ghermawat 2005)
- Mandate strategy
- Awarding some regions with broad mandates to supply particular products or perform particular roles for the whole organization
- Roles and products are different by region but are used throughout the organization (globally)
- Unlike in “Hub”, which are used within the region
- This cousin of the platform strategy focuses on economies of specialization as well as scale.
Potential problem with mandate strategy:
- Local interest might “hijack” firm’s strategy = Entire company can be “shut down form a single point”
What is the difference between open and closed innovation?
Innovation strategies = Structuring of innovation process within an organization
- Closed ⇒ innovations made purely from internal R&D
- Open ⇒ based on input and decisions of suppliers, customers, competitors and internal R&D.
Where does innovation strategies, product strategies and competitive strategies come into play in the value chain?
What does Vahlne and Johanson’s (1977) table results show?
That the firms investigated almost solely move one step at a time in their internationalization (ESTABLISHMENT CHAIN), where the steps are:
n = no regular export activity
a = selling via agent
s = sales subsidiary
p = production subsidiary
What is the definition of psychic distance? (Johanson and Vahlne 1977)
“Factors preventing the flow of information from and to the market”
Cross-country differences in
- Language
- Education
- Business practice
- Culture and
- Industrial / Economic development.
What is liability of foreignness?
MNCs doing business abroad face costs from:
- Unfamiliarity of environment
- Cultural, political, economic differences
- Need to coordinate across geographic distances
⇒ Somewhat similar to psychic distance.
What is institutional distance?
Differences between the home and host countries on institutional dimensions
- Regulative:
- Selected indicators from World Bank, global competitiveness, (antitrust, political transparency, IP protection etc.)
- Normative:
- Government transparency, corruption, political risk
- Cognitive-cultural
- Based on Hofstede
What is the difference between psychic distance and institutional distance?
What are the state and change aspects of the model by Johanson and Vahlne (2009)?
What are the STATE components of the revisited Johanson and Vahlne model (2009)?
- Market Knowledge
- Needs
- Capabilities
- Strategies
- Networks of firms
- Recognition of opportunities
- Reduction of uncertainty
- Network position
- Internationalization processes pursued within a network
What are the CHANGE components of the revisited Johanson and Vahlne model (2009)?
- Relationship commitment decisions
- May change entry mode or investment size
- Two types of decisions
- Augment existing relationships
- Develop new relationships
- Learning
- Creation of knowledge
- Trust-building
What is the difference between the original Uppsala model and the revisited model? (Johanson and Vahlne 2009)
In the revisited model, the business environment is viewed as a web of relationships, a network, rather than as a neoclassical market with many independent suppliers and customers.
- OUTSIDERSHIP in relation to the relevant network, more than psychic distance, is the root of uncertainty.
⇒ Also adding trust-building and knowledge creation to the change mechanisms of the model.
⇒ Now, our view is that successful internationalization requires a reciprocal commitment between the firm and its counterparts.
How can you explain the model presented by Johanson and Vahlne in plain english? (2009)
- Firms internationalize gradually
- First in space by entering familiar countries and later less familiar countries
- Secondly, in commitment - do not commit too many resources at first (agents to subsidiary to production etc.)
- Current knowledge and relationships (STATE) affect future decisions and actions (CHANGE aspects)
- These future decisions in turn affect future relationships (CHANGE) = loop back to STATE
What is the psychic distance paradox? (O’Grady and Lane 1996)
Starting the internationalization process by entering a country psychically close to home may result in failure due to wrong assumptions of similarity.
Causes:
- Overestimation of “closeness”
- Managers overlook important differences
- Assuming that one can simply transfer and extrapolate business model to a “similar” market
Learnings:
- Treat even psychically close markets as foreign markets
- Test assumptions and perception prior to entry
- Interpret data about the market correctly
- Increase knowledge and understanding of other countries
What are the main learnings from the psychic distance paradox:? (O’Grady and Lane 1996)
- Treat even psychically close markets as foreign markets
- Test assumptions and perception prior to entry
- Interpret data about the market correctly
- Increase knowledge and understanding of other countries
What are the causes of the psychic distance paradox? (O’Grady and Lane 1996)
Causes:
- Overestimation of “closeness”
- Managers overlook important differences
- Assuming that one can simply transfer and extrapolate business model to a “similar” market
What are born globals? (Hitt et al. 2016)
- Firms that become international (resources & sales) at or shortly after inception.
Two factors affecting early internationalization
- Most often communications technologies
- Typically small size where lack of tangible resources do not hamper international operations
What can contribute to early internationalization? (Hitt et al. 2016)
- Management/Founders international experience
- Low psychic and institutional distance between home and target country
- Tech-based companies (born globals)
- Global preferences
What is establishment chain of the Uppsala model?
As sales grow, companies replace their agents with their own sales organization, and as growth continues they begin manufacturing in the foreign market to overcome the trade barriers.
What is psychic distance in the Uppsala model?
The pattern that internationalization frequently started in foreign markets that were close to the domestic market in terms of psychic distance; defined as factors that make it difficult to understand foreign environments.
What are the pillars of Porter’s 5 Forces and why is the model relevant to us?
The 5 forces can be used to determine the level of rivalry between MNCs.
Useful in competitor analysis and questions about the likelihood of attacks and responses.
What creates rivalry (despite the 5 forces):
- Several equally strong players (McD, BurgerKing)
- Low growth in the market or no growth
- High fixed costs
- Excess production capacities (container shipping now)
- Little opportunities for differentiation
- High Strategic stakes
- Major barriers to exit
What is multipoint competition? (Chen 1996)
Situations where firms compete against each other simultaneously in several markets.
What is the unit of analysis in Chen vs. Porter’s 5 forces?
- Chen = The FIRM
- Porter = The INDUSTRY
Chen finds that two firms in the same industry are not necessarily competitors.
Fx. Coca Cola see Pepsi as the biggest competitor in Denmark and do not consider Harboe much, while Harboe considers Coca Cola.
What is competitive asymmetry and what is its effect? (Chen 1996)
The notion that a given pair of firms may not pose an equal threat to each other.
Each firm will define competitors differently. Competition is not transitive, i.e. if A is a major competitor of B, and B is a major competitor of C, it does not necessarily follow that A is a major competitor of C.
For example, Harboe might consider Coca Cola/Carlsberg as a main competitor while Coca Cola/Carlsberg don’t think about Harboe
What is Market commonality (Chen 1996)?
Market commonality is firm specific, and it is considered from a focal firm’s point of view.
Market commonality is defined as “the degree of presence that a competitor manifests in the markets it overlaps with the focal firm”,
What is a market? (Chen 1996)
Geography-based, customer-based OR product-based: Geographical market, customer segment, brand (p. 107)
What are Resource similarity (Chen 1996)
Resource similarity is defined as “the extent to which a given competitor possesses strategic endowments comparable”, in terms of both type and amount, “to those of the focal firm”.
Similar resources = most often also similar competitive advantages and competitive vulnerabilities.
What is an Attack? (Chen 1996)
“A competitive move that lead to firm acquiring its rival’s market shares or reducing their anticipated returns” (p 109).
E.g. introducing a new product or entering a new market (customer-based, product-based or geography-based)
What is a response? (Chen 1996)
“A specific countermove, prompted by a rival’s attack, that a firm takes to defend or improve its share of profit position in the industry” (p. 109).
Why do high market commonality and high resource similarity a) reduce the likelihood of an attack and b) increase the likelihood of a response? (question in class) (Yu & Cannella 2007)
- High market commonality results in competitors being aware and motivated to respond
- High resource similarity makes them capable of responding
- Reduce the likelihood of attack
- As direct rivals put themselves at huge risk when attacking their direct competitor. It is bad for margins of both player
- = Mutual forbearance hypothesis
- if you expect a response, you are less likely to attack in the first place.
- As direct rivals put themselves at huge risk when attacking their direct competitor. It is bad for margins of both player
- Increase the likelihood of a response
- If you have been attacked, one is almost forced to respond promptly.
Which 3 concepts did Yu & Canella (2007) present in relation to MNC rivalry?
Competitors will respond to an action ONLY IF they are aware of it and have the motivation and capability to respond.
- AWARE of the action and the host country where the attack took place
- MOTIVATED to respond to the action and to defend or expand their global presence
- CAPABLE of deploying resources to respond in host countries
Do we have fierce competitors in quadrant II?
If the resource strong firm attacks the other firm, the other firm will not be able to respond, because it does not have the resources.
=
Hence, not fierce competition even though they target same market.
Why is market commonality influencing likelihood to respond more than resource similarity?
One reason is
- If company A is a global competitor,company A will have other markets to play in
- Versus company B that is highly reliant on operating domestically
Fx Coca Cola versus Harboe. If Harboe is squeezed out of the Danish market, they will have no business (therefore, they will likely have high motivation to respond), whereas if Coca Cola is squeezed out of the Danish market, they will just have the other markets.
What is Cross-border competitive engagement defined as? (Chen and Stucker 1997)
A firm’s execution of competitive moves coordinated across various national markets against rivals.
- Initiating competitive actions coordinated across national markets
- Retaliating in national markets other than the one under attack
- Offering responses coordinated across multiple national markets
*What factors, other than resource and market commonality, increases the likelihood of cross-border competitive engagement?* (Chen & Stucker 1997)
WIGSFELL
-
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
- Rather than licensing, franchising etc. as you have better control of activities and can control incentives for managers more
-
International experience of managers
- Better knowledge of foreign markets
-
Global rather than multi-domestic MNC
- When whole world is the competitive arena, it is easier to coordinate activities (diversification benefits and cross-subsidization)
-
Size of organization
- Small firms are quick, flexible and innovative
-
First- and Second-mover advantages
- First = Above average returns until response + establishing market share and loyal customer base
- Second = Learn from mistakes (customer reactions)
- Entry barriers are low
-
Little cultural differences
- Between firm and competitor (similarity or resource endowments)
- Between HQ and subsidiaries (better and faster inter-organizational coordination)
- Low diversity among local markets (“Global market” argument)
What are some examples of fast- and slow cycle markets and what are the time periods (rule of thumb) a company can expect to live off their competitive advantage?
Fast-moving cycles (3-5 years)
- FMCG
- Fashion
- Software products
Slow-moving cycles (10 years)
- Pharmaceuticals
What is response speed?
- The time (days, months) between attack and response
- A slow response results in larger loss of market share or lost profit opportunities
In multi-market rivalry responses may occur in the initiating country or in a different country .
What determines response speed? (Yu & Canella 2007) = GS-HHS
-
Geographic distance
- The farther away, the harder to recognize (awareness)
- Takes time to transfer knowledge and resources
-
Subsidiary control
- The more control, the faster the response normally will be in the host country
-
Host government constraints
- Regulations and taxes ⇒ The environment might slow you down
-
Home government constraints
- Often help you as it makes it easier to make a response when you are the domestic player (period of protection)
-
Speed in host country
- Faster if the initiating country is of strategic importance (motivation)
- Faster if host country is the initiating country (faster response within-country)
- Faster in multi-market rivalry situations (Chen’s basic argument = higher market commonality)
How does companies obtain sustainable competitive advantages? (Barney 1991)
Firms obtain sustained competitive advantages by implementing strategies that exploit their internal strengths, through responding to environmental opportunities, while neutralizing external threats and avoiding internal weaknesses.
How does Barney (1991) define “resources”?
All assets, capabilities, organizational processes, firm attributes, information, knowledge etc. controlled by a firm THAT ENABLE (= some may prevent or be neutral) the firm to conceive of and implement strategies that improve its efficiency and effectiveness (Draft 1983)
⇒ Need to be value-creating
What are the 3 types of resources? = PHO (like the Vietnamese noodle dish) (Barney 1991)
-
Physical capital resources (VERY TANGIBLE)
- Technology, Plants, equipment, geographic location, access to raw materials etc.
-
Human capital resources
- Training, experience, judgment, intelligence
- Relationships and insights etc. of individual managers and workers.
-
Organizational capital resources (MUCH MORE INTANGIBLE)
- Reporting structures, planning, controlling, and coordinating systems
- Informal relations among groups within a firm and between the firm and its environment
What is the difference between a competitive advantage and a SUSTAINED one? (Barney 1991)
Competitive advantage
- A strategy not implemented by a current or potential competitor
Sustained competitive advantage
- A strategy not implemented by a current or potential competitor
- That CANNOT be implemented by a competitor (nobody can duplicate the benefits)
- NOT time-based (focused on the possibility of duplication)
- Might be upended by structural changes in the industry when VRIN attributes of resources change.