Ib Flashcards

1
Q

Intentional terms: abstraction tools for system description & prediction

A
  • Physical stance physical properties and laws
  • Design stance design principles (teleological)
  • Intentional stance assumption of rational agency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Author of Intentional Stance

A

Dennett, 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stages of Mentalising/Prediction

A

• First-order: system has beliefs, desires, wishes, hopes, …
• Second-order: system has beliefs, desires,… about beliefs, desires,…
(its own and of others); etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Application of Prediction

A

when complete, exact modeling is not available/practical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Problem and Solutions of Prediction

A

Problem: Representation not possible in first order predicate logics
Solutions:
Formally: modal logics, meta-languages (predicates for intentions)
– Semantically: possible world semantics ! logical omniscience problem (perfect reasoning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition ToM and author

A

Ability to impute mental states to oneself and to others (Premack&Woodruff, 1978)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Characteristics of ToM

A

Importance of knowing what others do and do not know (Frith&Frith, 2010)
• Automatic, of importance for oneself (e.g., object recognition from different perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Innate Skills - Developmental Psychology

A

• Imitation of observed movements
• Nonverbal interaction with faces and human voices
! “social referencing”, already with nine months of age:
Facial expression of reference persons as information source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Abilities of children at 3

A

difficulties with wrong assumptions
e.g., crayons hidden in candy box
“what will other kids expect to be in the box?” ! “Crayons!”
also for own recent wrong beliefs:
“what did you think you would find in the box?” ! “Crayons!”

Pretense:
distinction of pretending to be a rabbit and being a rabbit
! From desires to beliefs as basis for explanations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Abilities at age 5

A

gradual understanding of

the representational nature of beliefs (beliefs can also be wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Abilities before age 3

A
Desires:
Already before age 3:
understanding that desires…
…may remain unrealised
…determine emotions
…of different persons may differ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Abilities at age 6

A

Distinction of experienced and pretended emotion from age ~6
– Inferential capabilities when facing ambiguities and
complex sources of information
– “Stream of consciousness”
• Unconscious movements while sleeping; conscious sitting still
(cf. also A.Schnitzler “Fräulein Else“, J.Joyce “Ulysses“, D.Lodge “Thinks…”,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Communication - two persons interaction and name

A

Interplay of involuntary (e.g. biological motion, mind-reading, mirroring) and
deliberate ostensive (attention-attracting) signalling to
“close the loop”
(Frith&Frith, 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Father of Folk Psychology

A

Wilhelm Wundt (1916): “Völkerpsychologie”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Another name for Folk Psychology

A

“Naïve” or “common sense” psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Principles of FP

A
(Partial) explanation of human behaviour by means of useful
mental constructs
– Beliefs, desires, preferences
– Intentions, expectations
– Hopes, fears
17
Q

Issues of FP

A

Status:
Scientific Theory (! Theory-Theory vs. Simulation)
– Reference for development of theories
– Scientifically useless, but useful in everyday life

18
Q

Theory Theory

A

Cognitive development as “scientific paradigm changes”
– Successions of intuitive “Theories of Mind” for explanation of subjective
experience and observed behaviour

19
Q

Philosophical interpretation of folk psychology

A

Assumption of actual internal (brain) states, corresponding to the abstract
mental entities and laws
– Possibility of prediction, interpretation, explanation
– Falsifiable ! theory change in the light of
counter examples, new data and results of experiments
– Questioning of the authority (=validity) of the conscious self (“I”)
• Knowledge about our own mind is as much of theoretical nature as
our knowledge about the minds of others

20
Q

THE Paper on ToM

A

Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A.M., Frith U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21(1):37-46

21
Q

Conclusions of THE Paper on ToM

A
Majority of autistics failed
(80%),
majority of others passed
(85+%)
to ensure the child has
• knowledge of real current
location of the object
• accurate memory of
previous location
…All pass
22
Q

Simulation

A

Modular approach

• Maturation of innate “Theory of Mind”-modules

23
Q

Modules of ToM

A

Eye direction detector, intentionality detector,
shared attention mechanism (pointing, gaze following)
develop at ~18 months

24
Q

What is Simulation

A

Simulation of/Imagination of putting oneself in someones’ place
(also important for onself àanticipation, planning)
• Important role of socialisation and social interaction

25
Q

Name Simulation

A

Baron-Cohen, Leslie

26
Q

Paradigms of Cognition

A

Modularity vs. distributed processing - local vs. global properties

Cognitivism vs. Emergent Systems vs. Hybrid Systems

27
Q

Explain Pricniples of Cognitive Engineering and Name

A

Wilson et al.2013,

  • macro- micro-cognition
  • experimentation and Observation
  • C - cognitive psychologists
  • B - Cognitive System Engineers