I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS Flashcards
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
A. When Law Takes Effect; Publication (Civil Code, art. 2)
15 D After P in OG
Art 2. Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication either in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines, unless it is otherwise provided
Laws take effect on the 16th day.
Unless otherwise provided = another mode of publication, not in OG or N GC
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
B. Ignorance of the Law; (Civil Code, art. 3) Ignorance of Fact
IL excuses No1
Vs. ioF refers to L of K of a cF = defense if affects Intent
ARTICLE 3. Ignorance of the law excuses no one from compliance therewith
Ignorance of fact refers to a lack of knowledge or awareness of a particular factual circumstance or situation.
Legal Implications:
Ignorance of fact may be relevant to certain legal defenses or arguments, particularly if the lack of knowledge affects the individual’s Intent
Conclusive presumption of knowledge of what the law is.
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
C. Retroactivity of Laws (Civil Code, art. 4); Vested Rights Principle
GR-Laws have NO Retro Exc
Indiv/Entity w VR are Protected Fr Laws w/c Diminish these R
Article 4 of the Philippine Civil Code states that laws shall not have retroactive effect unless otherwise provided.
This means that laws enacted after an event cannot apply to change the legal consequences or rights of that event. This principle is crucial in upholding the concept of vested rights.
Vested rights refer to rights that have ALREADY been ACQUIRED or established under existing laws.
These rights are considered fixed and cannot be taken away by subsequent legislation.
Article 4 ensures that individuals or entities with vested rights are protected from being affected by new laws that would retroactively alter or diminish those rights.
For example, if a law is passed increasing the tax rate for a certain type of income, it cannot be applied retroactively to income earned before the law’s enactment. This is because individuals have already acquired the right to that income under the previous tax laws, and retroactively applying the new tax rate would violate their vested rights.
In summary, Article 4 safeguards individuals’ vested rights by prohibiting laws from having retroactive effects, thereby ensuring legal stability and predictability.
SC decision interpreting a law = contemporaneous legislative intent
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
D. Mandatory, Prohibitory and Permissive Laws (Civil Code, art. 5)
iFO
impose
Forbd
Optn
Mandatory, prohibitory, and permissive laws differ in their nature, application, and legal consequences:
Key Points of Differences:
- Nature:
- Mandatory laws: These laws IMPOSE obligations or duties that must be complied with by individuals or entities.
- Prohibitory laws: Prohibitory laws FORBID certain actions or behaviors.
- Permissive laws: Permissive laws GRANT individuals or entities the option or DISCRETION to take certain actions.
- Legal Consequences:
- Mandatory laws: Non-compliance with mandatory laws usually leads to legal PENALTIES, such as fines, injunctions, or other judicial remedies.
- Prohibitory laws: Violations of prohibitory laws can result in criminal or civil LIABILITIES, including fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.
- Permissive laws: Since compliance with permissive laws is optional, there are typically NO LEGAL CONSEQUENCES for choosing not to exercise the permitted action.
- Scope of Regulation: to REGULATE conduct or behavior
Key Points of Similarities:
- Legal Framework:
- All three types of laws are part of the legal framework governing behavior and conduct within a jurisdiction.
- Legislative Intent:
- The enactment of mandatory, prohibitory, and permissive laws reflects the legislative intent to regulate various aspects of society and ensure compliance with established norms and standards.
- Enforcement Mechanisms:
- While the legal consequences may differ, all three types of laws are subject to enforcement by relevant authorities, such as law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, or the judiciary.
They are all essential components of the legal system aimed at maintaining order and promoting the common good.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
E. Waiver of Rights (Civil Code, art. 6)
GR
EXC
3elements for valid W
Rights may be waived,
unless the waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals, or good customs,
or prejudicial to a third person with a right recognized by law.
Exceptions to this general rule include situations where the law itself authorizes the validity of the waiver despite it being contrary to the aforementioned legal principles.
Elements of a valid waiver: a) right exists; b) knowledge of that existence; c) intention to Give up/Reject that right eg. there is Capacity to Dispose
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
F. Repeal of Laws (Civil Code, art. 7)
How is it repealed
What is the doctrine of operative fact?
Acknwldg legConsq evenif
ARTICLE 7. Laws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or non-observance shall not be excused by disuse, or custom or practice to the contrary.
When the courts declare a law to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the former shall be void and the latter shall govern.
Administrative or executive acts, orders and regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to the laws or the Constitution.
The doctrine of operative fact is a legal principle that allows certain acts or transactions to remain valid and effective despite their underlying legal infirmity. Essentially, it acknowledges the Legal consequences that have ALREADY ARISEN from these acts or transactions, even if they are later declared void or invalid by a court.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
G. Judicial Decision (Civil Code, art. 8)
SC decisions = contemp interp of Leg intent
ARTICLE 8. Judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution shall FORM PART of the LEGAL SYSTEM of the Philippines
eg. SC’s decision form part of contemporaneous interpretation of the legislative intent in light of economic, social, & political development
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
H. Duty to Render Judgment (Civil Code, art. 9)
No J s D to RJ due to soi
ARTICLE 9. No judge or court shall decline to render judgment by reason of the silence, obscurity or insufficiency of the laws.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
I. Interpretation of Doubtful Statutes (Civil Code, art. 10)
In c of D, P that Legis i R&J to P
ARTICLE 10. In case of doubt in the interpretation or application of laws, it is presumed that the lawmaking body intended RIGHT and JUSTICE to prevail.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
J. Custom (Civil Code, arts. 11-12)
If C are C to L, its not S
How to P? acc to RulesofE
ARTICLE 11. Customs which are contrary to law, public order or public policy shall NOT be SUPPORTED. (n)
ARTICLE 12. A custom must be proved as a fact, according to the rules of evidence.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
K. Legal Periods (Civil Code, art. 13, as amended by Book I, chapter 8, sec. 31 of
the Administrative Code of 1987 (E.O. No. 292))
365 30 24
“When the laws speak of years, months, days or nights, it shall be understood that
years are of three hundred sixty-five days each;
months, of thirty days;
days, of twenty-four hours;
and nights from sunset to sunrise.”
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
L. Generality Principle of Penal Laws (Civil Code, art. 14)
Obligatory upon All who Live/Sojourn
ARTICLE 14. Penal laws and those of public security and safety shall be obligatory upon all who live or sojourn in Philippine territory, subject to the principles of public international law and to treaty stipulations
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
M. Conflict of Laws (Civil Code, arts. 15-18)
1. Jurisdiction; Forum Non Conveniens
Apply Nat Prin for FRAD, Stat & Cap of Filos even if abroad
For NC- Court will dismiss the case if FJ is more App
- ARTICLE 15: This rule establishes that laws concerning family rights and duties, as well as the legal status, condition, and capacity of individuals, apply to Filipino citizens regardless of their residence abroad. This ensures that citizens remain subject to Philippine laws concerning familial matters and personal status, even when living outside the country.
- ARTICLE 16: It states that the laws governing real and personal property are determined by the country where the property is located. However, regarding inheritance (intestate and testamentary successions), the national law of the deceased person regulates the succession, irrespective of the property’s location.
- ARTICLE 17: This rule dictates that the forms and procedures for contracts, wills, and other public instruments are governed by the laws of the country where they are executed. When executed before Philippine diplomatic or consular officials abroad, they must adhere to Philippine laws. Additionally, laws related to public order, public policy, and good customs cannot be circumvented by foreign laws or judgments.
- ARTICLE 18: In cases governed by the Code of Commerce and special laws, any gaps or deficiencies in these laws are to be supplemented by the provisions of the Civil Code of the Philippines. This ensures consistency and coherence in legal matters, particularly in commercial and specialized areas where specific laws apply.
The concept of forum non conveniens, or “inconvenient forum,” is rooted in the principles outlined in Articles 15 to 18 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. It refers to the discretionary power of a court to dismiss a case if it deems that another forum, usually a foreign jurisdiction, is more appropriate and convenient for the resolution of the dispute.
Under Article 15, while Philippine laws apply to Filipino citizens regardless of their residence abroad, the legal system acknowledges the existence of other jurisdictions with their own laws. Similarly, Articles 16 and 17 recognize the significance of foreign laws and legal systems, particularly concerning matters such as property rights, contracts, and public instruments.
Forum non conveniens comes into play when a court determines that the forum chosen by the plaintiff for litigation is inappropriate or inconvenient, often because another forum has a stronger connection to the dispute or can more effectively adjudicate the matter. This concept is based on principles of judicial efficiency, fairness, and the avoidance of unnecessary litigation.
In practical terms, if a court applies the doctrine of forum non conveniens, it may dismiss the case, allowing the plaintiff to pursue their claim in a more suitable jurisdiction. This decision balances the interests of the parties involved and aims to promote a fair and efficient resolution of legal disputes, considering factors such as the location of evidence, witnesses, applicable law, and the overall convenience for both parties.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
M. Conflict of Laws sit (Civil Code, arts. 15-18)
- Choice of Law; Doctrine of Renvoi; Doctrine of Processual Presumption
a. Lex Nationalii
b. Lex Rei Sitae
c. Lex Contractus
d. Lex Loci Celebrationis
e. Lex Domicilii
f. Lex Fori
g. Lex Loci Delicti
h. Lex Loci Solutionis
Choice of Law, Doctrine of Renvoi, and Doctrine of Processual Presumption are legal principles used in conflict of laws situations to determine which jurisdiction’s laws should apply to a particular case. Here’s a comparison of these principles:
-
Choice of Law:
- Definition: Choice of Law refers to the process of SELECTING the SUBSTANTV law that governs a legal dispute. It involves determining which jurisdiction’s laws should be applied to resolve the issues raised in the case.
- Basis: The choice of law may be based on various factors, such as the parties’ intentions, the place where the contract was formed or the tort occurred, or the jurisdiction with the most significant relationship to the dispute.
- Purpose: The aim of the choice of law is to ensure a fair and just resolution by applying the laws of the jurisdiction with the closest connection to the legal issues involved in the case.
-
Doctrine of Renvoi:
- Definition: The Doctrine of Renvoi arises when a court is required to determine which jurisdiction’s law applies, and the conflict of laws rules of the forum state refer the court back to the laws of another jurisdiction.
- Basis: This doctrine involves a “looping” or “sending back” of the case to another jurisdiction based on that jurisdiction’s conflict of laws rules. The court may apply the law of the other jurisdiction as it would have been applied by the courts of that jurisdiction.
- Purpose: The purpose of the Doctrine of Renvoi is to avoid creating a legal vacuum or inconsistency by recognizing and applying the conflict of laws rules of the other jurisdiction.
-
Doctrine of Processual Presumption:
- Definition: The Doctrine of Processual Presumption pertains to procedural matters and determines which procedural law governs the conduct of legal proceedings.
- Basis: It presumes that the procedural laws of the forum state apply to the conduct of legal proceedings unless there is a clear indication otherwise.
- Purpose: This doctrine ensures uniformity and predictability in legal proceedings by applying the procedural laws of the forum state unless there are compelling reasons to apply the procedural laws of another jurisdiction.
Key Differences:
- Choice of Law focuses on substantive legal issues, while the Doctrine of Processual Presumption pertains to procedural matters.
- The Doctrine of Renvoi deals specifically with conflicts regarding which jurisdiction’s laws should apply, especially when a foreign jurisdiction’s conflict of laws rules refer the case back to the forum state.
Key Similarities:
- All three principles aim to resolve conflicts of laws by providing guidelines for determining which jurisdiction’s laws apply to a particular legal issue or case.
- They contribute to the clarity, consistency, and fairness of the legal process by providing rules for addressing conflicts between different legal systems or jurisdictions.
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
M. Conflict of Laws (Civil Code, arts. 15-18)
- Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment
P of ComitY
Reqs : Jursdctn & Due Process, Fairness
Pet for Recig & Enfrcmnt
- Principle of Comity: The Philippines recognizes the principle of comity, which involves showing respect and deference to the legal decisions and judgments of foreign courts. This principle encourages cooperation and reciprocity among nations in recognizing and enforcing each other’s judgments.
-
Conditions for Recognition and Enforcement: Foreign judgments may be recognized and enforced in the Philippines if certain conditions are met. These conditions typically include:
- Jurisdiction: The foreign court must have had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of the case according to the principles of international law.
- Due Process: The foreign judgment must have been rendered following fair and impartial procedures that adhere to the principles of due process.
- Finality: The foreign judgment must be final and conclusive, with no further avenues for appeal or review available in the foreign jurisdiction.
- Consistency with Public Policy: The enforcement of the foreign judgment must not be contrary to the public policy or fundamental principles of justice in the Philippines.
- Filing a Petition for Recognition and Enforcement: To have a foreign judgment recognized and enforced in the Philippines, the party seeking enforcement typically needs to file a petition with the appropriate court. The petition should include the necessary documents and evidence to demonstrate that the foreign judgment meets the conditions for recognition and enforcement.
- Court Discretion: While the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are generally governed by established legal principles, the court retains discretion to evaluate the specific circumstances of each case. This discretion allows the court to consider factors such as the interests of justice and equity in deciding whether to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment.
- Domestic Law and Treaties: The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Philippines may also be influenced by domestic laws and international treaties. Certain treaties or agreements between the Philippines and other countries may provide specific procedures or requirements for the recognition and enforcement of judgments issued by courts in those countries.
Overall, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Philippines involve a careful assessment of various legal principles, procedural requirements, and considerations of fairness and public policy.
- According to Article 2, when do laws typically take effect in the Philippines?
a) Immediately after their approval by the legislative body
b) Fifteen days after their approval by the executive branch
c) Fifteen days following their publication in the Official Gazette or a newspaper of general circulation
d) Thirty days following their publication in the Official Gazette
- Answer: c) Fifteen days following their publication in the Official Gazette or a newspaper of general circulation
Basis in Law: This answer is derived directly from the text of Article 2 of the Philippine Civil Code, which specifies that laws shall take effect fifteen days after their publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, unless otherwise provided.
- Which of the following is a requirement for the effectiveness of laws as stated in Article 2?
a) Approval by the President of the Philippines
b) Publication in the Official Gazette
c) Enactment by the legislative body
d) Endorsement by the Supreme Court
- Answer: c) Enactment by the legislative body
Basis in Law: According to Article 2, for laws to take effect, they must be enacted by the legislative body. While publication is a necessary step, it is the legislative act that gives the law its force.