I. Client-Lawyer Relationship Flashcards
What does the competency duty require?
Legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
MRPC Rule 1.1 (2014).
What are the relevant factor to determine a lawyer employed the requisite knowledge and skill?
(1) The relative complexity and specialized nature of the matter;
(2) The lawyer’s general experience;
(3) The lawyer’s training and experience in the field in question;
(4) The preparation and study the lawyer is able to give the matter; and
(5) Whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field in question.
MRPC 1.1, comment 1 (2014).
Must a lawyer already posses the specialized training in the field or prior experience in the field to accept a case within that field?
No. A lawyer need not necessarily have special training or prior experience to handle legal problems of a type with which the lawyer is unfamiliar. A lawyer can provide adequate representation in a wholly novel field through necessary study.
MRPC 1.1, comment 2 (2014).
May a lawyer ever give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required?
Yes. A lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would be impractical.
MRPC 1.1, comment 3 (2014).
What factors are central to determining your attention and preparation is adequate for that particular case?
(1) What is at stake—major litigation and complex transaction ordinary require more extensive treatment than matter of lesser complexity and consequence.
(2) The scope of representation.
MRPC 1.1, comment 5 (2014).
What constitutes competent handling of a particular matter?
(1) Inquiry into and analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem;
(2) Use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners.
(3) Adequate preparation.
MRPC 1.1, comment 5 (2014).
What must a lawyer do prior to retaining or contacting lawyers outside the lawyer’s own firm for assistance?
(1) Obtain informed consent from the client;
(2) Must reasonably believe that the other lawyers’ services will contribute to the competent and ethical representation of the client.
MRPC 1.1, comment 6 (2014).
What factors are considered when determining the reasonableness to retain or contract with other lawyers outside their own firm?
(1) The circumstances, including the education, experience, and reputation of the nonfirm lawyers;
(2) The nature of the services assigned to the nonfirm lawyer;
(3) The legal protections, professional conduct rules, and ethical environments of the jurisdictions in which the services will be performed, particularly relating to confidential information.
MRPC 1.1, comment 6 (2014).
What must lawyers from more than one law firm do under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct before providing legal services to clients?
The lawyers ordinary should consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations and the allocation or responsibility among them.
MRPC 1.1, comment 7 (2014).
What is required to maintain requisite knowledge and skill?
(1) A lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice (including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology),
(2) Engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education required to which the lawyer is subject.
MRPC 1.1, comment 8 (2014).
How does the Model Rules of Professional Conduct define “reasonable”?
Reasonable, when used in relation to conduct by a lawyer, denotes the conduct of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.
MRPC 1.0(h) (2014).
What is the scope of an attorney’s representation of a client?
A lawyer shall:
(1) abide by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation, and
(2) shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued.
MRPC 1.2(a) (2014).
Who makes the decision on whether to settle a civil action?
The client.
MRPC 1.2(a) (2014).
Who makes the decision on the plea being entered in a criminal matter?
The client.
MRPC 1.2(a) (2014).
Who makes the decision on whether to pursue a jury trial in a criminal matter?
The client.
MRPC 1.2(a) (2014).
Does a lawyer necessarily endorse their client’s actions?
No. A lawyer’s representation of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the client’s political, economic, social or moral views or activities.
MRPC 1.2(b) (2014).
What standard applies for limitations on the scope of the representation imposed by the lawyer?
A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.
MRPC 1.2(c) (2014).
What is a lawyer’s role when a client requests assistance in an illegal or fraudulent act?
A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. A lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine he validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.
MRPC 1.2(d) (2014).
What deferences do the model rules suggest clients and lawyers make regarding decision making?
Clients normally defer to the special knowledge and skill of their lawyer with respect to the means to be used to accomplish their objectives, particularly with respect to technical, legal and tactical matters.
Lawyers usually defer to the client regarding such questions as the expense to be incurred and concern for third persons who might be adversely affected.
MRPC 1.2, comment 2 (2014).
When can a lawyer rely on advanced authorizations?
At the outset of a representation, the client may authorize the lawyer to take specific action on the client’s behalf without further consultation. Absent a material change in circumstance, a lawyer may rely on such an advance authorization. The client may revoke such authority at any time.
MRPC 1.2, comment 3 (2014).
What policy justifies the professional rule regarding implied endorsement of a client’s behavior?
Legal representation should not be denied to people who are unable to afford legal services, or whose cause is controversial or the subject of popular disapproval.
MRPC 1.2, comment 5 (2014).
If a lawyer gives a client an honest opinion regarding the legal consequence of an illegal act, is the lawyer culpable under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct?
No. The fact that a client uses advice in a course of action that is criminal or fraudulent of itself make a lawyer a party to the course of action.
MRPC 1.2, comment 9 (2014).
What course of action must a lawyer take if she or he discovers the client is using her or his work for illegal or fraudulent purposes?
A lawyer may not continue assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer originally supposed was legally proper but then discovers is criminal or fraudulent.
MRPC 1.2, comment 10 (2014).
What must a lawyer do if the client expects assistance not permitted by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct?
The lawyer must consult with the client regarding the limitations on the lawyer’s conduct.
MRPC 1.2, comment 13 (2014).
What must a lawyer do if she or he intends to act contrary to the client’s instructions?
The lawyer must consult with the client regarding the limitations on the lawyer’s conduct.
MRPC 1.2, comment 13 (2014).
How does the Model Rules of Professional Conduct define “fraudulent”?
Fraud or fraudulent denotes conduct that t is fraudulent under the substantive or procedural law of the applicable jurisdiction and has a purpose to deceive.
MRPC 1.0(d) (2014).
How does the Model Rules of Professional Conduct define “informed consent”?
Informed consent denotes the agreement by a person to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated adequate information and explanation about he material risks of an reasonably available alternatives to the proposed course of conduct.
MRPC 1.0(e) (2014).
How does the Model Rules of Professional Conduct define “knows”?
Knowingly, known, or knows denotes actual knowledge of fact in question. A person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances.
MRPC 1.0(f) (2014).
What is the standard applied to a lawyer’s work and work product?
A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.
MRPC 1.3 (2014).
What can limit a lawyer’s duty of diligence and promptness?
A lawyer is not bound to press for every advantage that might be realized for a client. The lawyer’s duty to act with reasonable diligence does not require the use of offensive tactics or preclude the treating of all persons involved int eh legal process with courtesy and respect.
MRPC 1.3, comment 1 (2014).
What should a lawyer do to fulfill her or his duty of diligence and promptness?
A lawyer should pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition, obstruction or personal inconvenience to the lawyer, and take whatever lawful and ethical measures are required to vindicate a client’s cause or endeavor.
MRPC 1.3, comment 1 (2014).
What professional shortcoming is the most widely resented in the legal profession?
Procrastination.
MRPC 1.3, comment 3 (2014).
What are the negative effects of procrastination?
(1) A client’s interests often can be adversely affected by the passage of time or changes in conditions;
(2) A client’s legal position could be destroyed by a statute of limitation; and
(3) Unreasonable delay can cause a client needless anxiety and undermine confidence in the lawyer’s trustworthiness.
MRPC 1.3, comment 3 (2014).
Can a lawyer grant the opposing party a postponement and maintain their duty to act with reasonable promptness?
Yes. A lawyer may agree to a reasonable request for a postponement that will not prejudice the lawyer’s client.
MRPC 1.3, comment 3 (2014).
Can a lawyer arbitrarily not carry a client’s matter to conclusion?
No. Unless the relationship is terminated, a lawyer should carry through to conclusion all matters undertaken fro a client.
MRPC 1.3, comment 4 (2014).
When is a lawyer’s duty fulfilled when the scope is limited to a specific matter?
A lawyer employed to resolve a specific matter remains the lawyer to the client until the matter has been resolved.
MRPC 1.3, comment 4 (2014).
What must a lawyer do who has served a client for several different matter to ensure the relationship has ended?
If a lawyer has served a client over a substantial period in a variety of matters, the client somethings may assume that he lawyer will continue to serve on a continuing basis unless the lawyer gives notice of withdrawal. Doubt about whether a client-lawyer relationship still exists should be clarified by the lawyer, preferably inwrapping, so that the client will not mistakenly suppose the lawyer is looking after the client’s affairs when the lawyer has ceased to do so.
MRPC 1.3, comment 4 (2014).
Does a lawyer have an obligation to appeal a trial judgment?
Whether the lawyer is obligated to prosecute the appeal for the client depends on the scope of the representation the lawyer has agreed to provide to the client.
MRPC 1.3, comment 4 (2014).
What must sole-practitioners do to prevent neglect of their client’s matters in the event of their death or disability?
The duty of diligence may require that each sole practitioner prepare a plan, in conformity with applicable rules, that designates another competent lawyer to review client files, notify each client of the lawyer’s death or disability, and determine whether there is a need for immediate protective action.
MRPC 1.3, comment 5 (2014).
What five things must every lawyer due to fulfill their communication duties?
(1) Promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client’s informed consent is required;
(2) Reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished;
(3) Keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;
(4) Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and
(5) Consult with the client about any relevant limitations not he lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct or by law.
MRPC 1.4(a) (2014).
What is the standard of understandability for communications between a lawyer and her or his client?
A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
MRPC 1.4(b) (2014).
Why is reasonable communication between a lawyer and her or his client necessary?
Reasonable communication between the lawyer and the client is necessary for the client effectively to participate in the representation.
MRPC 1.4, comment 1 (2014).
When can a lawyer make a decision regarding a matter requiring a client’s consent?
A lawyer may make a decision regarding a matter requiring a client’s consent if prior discussions with the client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to take.
MRPC 1.4, comment 2 (2014).
Must a lawyer always receive a client’s informed consent before taking an action on her or his behalf?
No. In some circumstances—depending on both the importance of the action under consideration and the feasibility of consulting with the client—the exigency of the situation may require the lawyer to act without prior consent.
MRPC 1.4, comment 3 (2014).
If a lawyer acts without a client’s informed consent, what duty does the lawyer owe the client?
(1) The lawyer must act reasonably to inform the client of actions the lawyer has taken on the client’s behalf; and
(2) The lawyer must keep the client reasonably informed about he status of the matter, such as significant developments affecting the timing or the substance of the representation.
MRPC 1.4, comment 3 (2014).
What must a lawyer do if a client makes a reasonable request for information the lawyer cannot fulfill promptly?
The lawyer—or a member of her or his staff—must acknowledge receipt of the request and advice the client when a response may be expected. A lawyer should promptly respond to or acknowledge client communications.
MRPC 1.4, comment 4 (2014).