Hypothesiss Testing For Multiple Regression Models Flashcards
Single linear restrictions tests we can do (3)
- Whether individual parameters take on particular values e.g common ones are
H₀: β₁=1 (test for unity e.g additional £1=additional £1 consumption!)
Or β₁=0 to test significance (if not 0 = significant!) - If regressors have same impact on dependent variable. E.g if degree and vocational equal impact income so we would set β₁=B₂ in our hypothesis!
- Testing sum of slope parameters (β) = 1
Tests of multiple linear restrictions (joint tests)
- Whether multiple parameters take on specific values.
- Whether slope parameters all =0
- Testing several restrictions involving multiple parameters e.g 𝐻0: 𝛽2 + 𝛽5 =
−1 and 𝛽₃ = 𝛽₄ and β₇=0
1st possible test:
Whether multiple parameters take on specific values example
Two variables with a one-for-one impact on the dependent variable.
E.g 𝐻0: 𝛽1 = 𝛽3 = 1
This is 2 restrictions at the same time (as saying parameters are equal to each other, but also equal to 1)
2nd possible test:
Test of overall significance
Whether slope parameters jointly =0
𝐻0: 𝛽1 = 𝛽2 = ⋯ = 𝛽𝑘 = 0
Different from the one in single restrictions, where we can test the SUM of slope parameters = 1 (so only 1 equal sign/restriction in the previous!!!)
If we accept null it means the regression line is not significant at all.
So now we know what can be tested, how do we test this?
A) for single linear restrictions
B) Multiple linear restrictions
A) T and F tests
B) f test only.
Relationship between t statistic and f statistic
T statistic ( result)squared is same as f statistic result
T²=F
F test
(RSSr - RSSu)/q
/
RSSu / [n-(k+1)]
~Fq, n - (k+1)
𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑟 is the residual sums of squares from the restricted model
𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑢 is the residual sums of squares from the unrestricted model
q is no. of restrictions imposed (1 in a single restriction)
1st possible case in single linear restrictions: Testing single linear restrictions involving multiple parameters e.g β₂=β₃
Which method is better to use in this situation?
(vocational=degree example)
F is easier
For F test
In the restricted model (assume β₂=β₃ just replace β₃ for b₂.
then factorise, and rename the factored bracket e.g Wi (remember we made W for groups of X)
Testing multiple restrictions (so can only do F test)
First example :
𝐻₀:𝛽₁ =𝛽₄ =1
Second example
Example 3: test of overall significant (All parameters jointly =0
What would the null hypothesis be?
𝐻₀:𝛽₁ =𝛽₂ =⋯=𝛽𝑘 =0
Same as saying 𝐻₀: 𝑅² = 0
Then, for overall significance tests we use an adjusted F test for R²
F=
R²/k
/
(1-R²) / [n-(k+1)]
~
Fk,n-(k+1)
In this instance Q=k since we are testing all parameters (k) are =0
We saw the best way for single linear with multiple parameters eg B2=B3 is using F test.
What is the formula for t test for single linear restrictions involving multiple parameters. E.g B2=B3
Problem set4q3d does this
B2-B3
/
SE(B2+B3) - 2σ₂β₂β₃