Hyland - why plato wrote dialogues Flashcards
True or False: According to Drew A. Hyland, the dramatic structure of the dialogue in Plato has no philosophic importance.
False
True or False: According to Hyland, one of the two legitimate reasons for writing is to enable readers to avoid remembering everything on a superficial level.
True
True or False: On a deeper level, according to Hyland, writing a philosophic treatise allows readers to forget to philosophize, and this is something the Platonic dialogues achieve.
False
True or False: The injunction to continue the dialogue at the end of Plato and Socrates’ dialogues is addressed only to the characters within the dialogue, not to the reader.
False
True or False: Hyland argues that dialogues can only succeed in reminding us to philosophize if they are read as dialogues.
True
True or False: According to Hyland, the second objection to writing treatises is that once they are published, they may fall into the hands of people who can misinterpret or have philanthropic motives. However, this cannot happen with dialogues because Plato never speaks.
True
True or False: The third objection to treatises, as mentioned by Hyland, is that they cannot defend themselves against accusations and misunderstandings. However, Hyland argues that Plato’s dialogues need no defending because there is no Platonic doctrine; the method of dialectic is the dialogue itself.
True
True or False: Plato saw philosophy as a propositional thing, and he embraced the conception of philosophy as a series of propositions, which allowed for dichotomy.
False
True or False: According to Hyland, the argument in question cannot be understood without understanding the experience, suggesting a connection between philosophy and lived experience.
True
True or False: Based on the interpretation of Plato’s theory of art by Hyland, Plato never wrote philosophy; instead, he engaged in art, presenting an imitation of reality in the dialogues that may lead readers to become philosophers.
True
True or False: The term “Aporia” refers to a state of confusion or puzzlement, often used in philosophy to describe a point of doubt or questioning.
True
True or False: According to Hyland, one of the two legitimate reasons for writing is to enable readers to avoid remembering everything on a superficial level.
True
True or False: Hyland argues that dialogues can only succeed in reminding us to philosophize if they are read as dialogues.
True
True or False: According to Hyland, Plato’s dialogues need no defending because there is no Platonic doctrine; the method of dialectic is the dialogue itself.
True
True or False: Hyland contends that Plato embraced the conception of philosophy as a series of propositions, allowing for dichotomy.
False