Hydrogen as an Aviation Fuel Flashcards

1
Q

Properties of Hydrogen

A
  • smallest & lightest known molecule
    - molecular weight: 2g/mol
    - energy density of gaseous hydrogen atm: 0.003 kWh/l
    - for liquid hydrogen: 2.35 kWh/l -> pretty low
    - 1dm^3 of gaseous hydrogen atm weighs 0.09g-> 14 times lighter than air
    - density of liquid hydrogen 70 g/dm^3
  • odorless
  • colorless
  • tasteless
  • flammable between 4-74%
  • comparatively high concentrations needed to form explosive mixture
  • non-toxic
  • boiling point: -252.76°C
  • melting point: -259.19°C
  • abundance
    - very low natural atm abundance of hydrogen molecule
    - increases with altitude - highly abundant in space
    - element H is highly abundant at earth, but bound to other elements -> needs to be extracted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hydrogen - diffusivity

A
  • physical diffusion: gas diffusivity is proportional to its molar weight -> diffuses fast bc of low weight
  • chemical diffusion: can diffuse through most materials including metals
    - makes materials brittle
    - poses challenges to (leak-tight) hydrogen storage design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Safety Aspects

A
  • in a ventilated/open space GH2 leakages dissipate very fast
  • accumulation of H2 can lead to sparks -> flames forming
  • flame in daylight hot, high, fast burning, but invisible -> flame isn’t deteceable
  • due to odorlessness & colorlessness leaks need to be detected via sensors
  • safety standards for high amounts of LH2 in aviation not available yet
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

types of LH2 storages

A
  • vacuum insulated
  • foam insulated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LH2 Storage Integration in Fuselage

A
  • spherical tanks pose challenge for integration but have ideal surface-to-volume-ratio -> need to be integrated in fuselage
  • integral tank structure
    - integrated within airframe
    - bears structural loads -> allows weight savings
    - tank diameter = fuselage diameter
  • non-integral tank structure
    - self-standing structure within fuselage
    - cannot bear any additional loads
    - tank diameter < fuselage diameter
  • redundancy requirements
    - sectioned tank structures
    - entirely separate tanks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

drawbacks of tank integration in fuselage

A
  • larger fuselage cross-section
  • additional drag
  • as no fuel is in the wing, wing needs more structural support
  • less cabin space
  • intrinsic challenge of flying LH2 tank -> flight dynamics of LH2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

LH2 fuel system

A
  • LH2 taken from tank
    - additional valves, sensors, venting system required
    - typically not included when tank gravimetric index is reported
    - esp. for smaller tanks
  • hydrogen needs to be distributed onboard
    - considerable temperature & pressure gradients involved
    - puts strain on materials
    - cooling & heating potentials need to be effectively used
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Green Hydrogen Production - Scaling Aspects

A
  • electrolysis covers &laquo_space;1% of global hydrogen demand
  • studies report that targets can only be met assuming high growth rates of ~100%/a
  • currently major H2 production path with natural gas (vast majority FF)
  • dominant processes
    - Steam methane reforming: CH4 + H2O <-> CO + 3 H2; CO + H2O <-> CO2 + H2
    - partial oxidation: CnHm + nH2O -> nCO + (n+m/2) H2; CnHm + n/2 O2 <-> nCO + m/2 H2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - Off Site production & Liquefaction

A

Green Hydrogen Production -> Liquefaction -> Transportation -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - Off Site Production & On Site Liquefaction

A

Green Hydrogen Production -> Transportation -> Liquefaction -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - On Site Production & Liquefaction

A

Green Hydrogen Production -> Liquefaction -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LH2 Transportation

A
  • transport vehicle availability very limited
  • developments & scale up necessary
  • cost-optimised fuel supply scenario may include transport over long distances to exploit cheap electricity
  • unavoidable boil-off: reuse e.g. for propulsion for optimised efficiency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Refuelling & Distribution at the Airport

A
  • major infrastructural adaptions
  • key components in (early) development
  • Hydrogen of high purity needed as impurities would solidify
  • due to lower volumetric flow longer turnover times may be necessary
  • bendable refuelling hoses not useable anymore
  • most suitable distribution & refuelling concept depends on hydrogen demand at respective airport
  • tanker concept: Mobile refuelling bowser with automated refuelling arm
  • hydrant concept: Transfer tank & pipe go into Mobile refuelling equipment
  • washing of equipment necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - round trip efficiency

A
  • battery: very high; ca. 96%
  • Hydrogen: medium; ca. 45%
  • Methane: medium to low; ca. 20%
  • liquid hydrocarbons: low; ca. 16%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - ease of storage

A
  • battery: charging -> discharging
  • Hydrogen: Electrolysis -> FC
  • Methane: CO-Electrolysis/Electrolysis & Methanation -> FC/Combustion
  • liquid hydrocarbons: CO-Electrolysis/Electrolysis - Fischer Tropsch -> Combustion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - duration & cost of storage

A
  • battery: minutes - hours; low cost
  • Hydrogen: days - months; medium to high cost
  • Methane & liquid hydrocarbons: low; ca. 16%stored easily over long periods but are expensive
17
Q

Hydrogen - Climate impact - Well-to-tank

A
  • comparatively high production efficiencies
  • low global warming potential
  • comparatively low water use
  • comparatively low land use
18
Q

Hydrogen - Climate Impact - In-Flight

A
  • Until now: aviation contributes significantly to anthropogenic climate change
  • no carbon-based in-flight emissions
  • water as main product
  • NOx also forms within the hydrogen combustion process (dep. on flame T, equivalence ratio, residence time…)
  • large uncertainties with climate impact of non-CO2
  • large uncertainties with effect of hydrogen as fuel for overall climate impact
19
Q

Effects of Emissions - CO2

A
  • long-lived greenhouse gas
  • not directly emitted by a H2 aircraft
  • can be emitted during H2 production
20
Q

Effects of Emissions - NOx

A
  • indirectly affects the climate by
    - ↓CH4 leading to cooling effect
    - ↑ozone leading to a warming effect -> net warming
    . formed during combustion (& to a way lesser extent in HT FCs)
  • strongly dependent on combustion process design & parameters as well as fuel properties
21
Q

Effects of Emissions - Hydrogen

A
  • may need to be vented
  • indirectly affects the climate by increasing in stratosphere
    - ↑CH4
    - ↑ozone
    - ↑H2O -> net warming
  • significant uncertainties
22
Q

Effects of Emissions - contrails/contrail cirrus

A
  • short-lived
  • affects climate by “trapping” thermal irradiation -> net warming
  • potentially most significant contributor to aviation’s climate impact
  • formation affected by soot & other particle emissions -> act as nucleation sites -> no soot in H2 aircraft
  • affected by ambient humidity & temperature
    - formation in low T ice-supersaturated air
    - rerouting/intermediate water storage may allow reducing contrails
  • high uncertainties associated
23
Q

Effects of Emissions - soot & sulfur

A
  • affect local air quality
  • affect contrail formation
24
Q

In-Flight Climate Impact - Research Effort

A
  • better understanding of aviation’s overall climate impact required
  • investigations of influence of soot on contrail formation using chase aircraft
  • further studies on contrail mitigation options
  • emphasis on low-box combustion designs
  • tool development towards adjusting aircraft design objectives towards least climate impact
25
Take Away Messages I)
- H2 fundamentally different properties than kerosene - energy density - volatility - diffusivity - mostly used in liquid form, affecting - supply chain - handling & refuelling - storage (&its interaction in aircraft) - H2 needs sustainable production to decarbonise production - production via electrolysis - location-dependence of favourable renewable sites - liquefaction as a considerable electricity consumer needs to be taken into account - green H2 also considered in other sectors - many uncertainties when it comes to overall climate impact of aviation in general & H2 aviation specifically - H2 aircraft can reduce/avoid in-flight emission of CO2, soot, sulfur - NOx emission strongly depends on detailed layout of energy conversion process - effect of contrails & mitigation as a major uncertainty & research effort