Hydrogen as an Aviation Fuel Flashcards
Properties of Hydrogen
- smallest & lightest known molecule
- molecular weight: 2g/mol
- energy density of gaseous hydrogen atm: 0.003 kWh/l
- for liquid hydrogen: 2.35 kWh/l -> pretty low
- 1dm^3 of gaseous hydrogen atm weighs 0.09g-> 14 times lighter than air
- density of liquid hydrogen 70 g/dm^3 - odorless
- colorless
- tasteless
- flammable between 4-74%
- comparatively high concentrations needed to form explosive mixture
- non-toxic
- boiling point: -252.76°C
- melting point: -259.19°C
- abundance
- very low natural atm abundance of hydrogen molecule
- increases with altitude - highly abundant in space
- element H is highly abundant at earth, but bound to other elements -> needs to be extracted
Hydrogen - diffusivity
- physical diffusion: gas diffusivity is proportional to its molar weight -> diffuses fast bc of low weight
- chemical diffusion: can diffuse through most materials including metals
- makes materials brittle
- poses challenges to (leak-tight) hydrogen storage design
Safety Aspects
- in a ventilated/open space GH2 leakages dissipate very fast
- accumulation of H2 can lead to sparks -> flames forming
- flame in daylight hot, high, fast burning, but invisible -> flame isn’t deteceable
- due to odorlessness & colorlessness leaks need to be detected via sensors
- safety standards for high amounts of LH2 in aviation not available yet
types of LH2 storages
- vacuum insulated
- foam insulated
LH2 Storage Integration in Fuselage
- spherical tanks pose challenge for integration but have ideal surface-to-volume-ratio -> need to be integrated in fuselage
- integral tank structure
- integrated within airframe
- bears structural loads -> allows weight savings
- tank diameter = fuselage diameter - non-integral tank structure
- self-standing structure within fuselage
- cannot bear any additional loads
- tank diameter < fuselage diameter - redundancy requirements
- sectioned tank structures
- entirely separate tanks
drawbacks of tank integration in fuselage
- larger fuselage cross-section
- additional drag
- as no fuel is in the wing, wing needs more structural support
- less cabin space
- intrinsic challenge of flying LH2 tank -> flight dynamics of LH2
LH2 fuel system
- LH2 taken from tank
- additional valves, sensors, venting system required
- typically not included when tank gravimetric index is reported
- esp. for smaller tanks - hydrogen needs to be distributed onboard
- considerable temperature & pressure gradients involved
- puts strain on materials
- cooling & heating potentials need to be effectively used
Green Hydrogen Production - Scaling Aspects
- electrolysis covers «_space;1% of global hydrogen demand
- studies report that targets can only be met assuming high growth rates of ~100%/a
- currently major H2 production path with natural gas (vast majority FF)
- dominant processes
- Steam methane reforming: CH4 + H2O <-> CO + 3 H2; CO + H2O <-> CO2 + H2
- partial oxidation: CnHm + nH2O -> nCO + (n+m/2) H2; CnHm + n/2 O2 <-> nCO + m/2 H2
Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - Off Site production & Liquefaction
Green Hydrogen Production -> Liquefaction -> Transportation -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling
Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - Off Site Production & On Site Liquefaction
Green Hydrogen Production -> Transportation -> Liquefaction -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling
Liquid Green Hydrogen Logistic & Supply - On Site Production & Liquefaction
Green Hydrogen Production -> Liquefaction -> Airport Storage -> Airport Distribution -> Refuelling
LH2 Transportation
- transport vehicle availability very limited
- developments & scale up necessary
- cost-optimised fuel supply scenario may include transport over long distances to exploit cheap electricity
- unavoidable boil-off: reuse e.g. for propulsion for optimised efficiency
Refuelling & Distribution at the Airport
- major infrastructural adaptions
- key components in (early) development
- Hydrogen of high purity needed as impurities would solidify
- due to lower volumetric flow longer turnover times may be necessary
- bendable refuelling hoses not useable anymore
- most suitable distribution & refuelling concept depends on hydrogen demand at respective airport
- tanker concept: Mobile refuelling bowser with automated refuelling arm
- hydrant concept: Transfer tank & pipe go into Mobile refuelling equipment
- washing of equipment necessary
Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - round trip efficiency
- battery: very high; ca. 96%
- Hydrogen: medium; ca. 45%
- Methane: medium to low; ca. 20%
- liquid hydrocarbons: low; ca. 16%
Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - ease of storage
- battery: charging -> discharging
- Hydrogen: Electrolysis -> FC
- Methane: CO-Electrolysis/Electrolysis & Methanation -> FC/Combustion
- liquid hydrocarbons: CO-Electrolysis/Electrolysis - Fischer Tropsch -> Combustion
Green Hydrogen for Electricity Storage - duration & cost of storage
- battery: minutes - hours; low cost
- Hydrogen: days - months; medium to high cost
- Methane & liquid hydrocarbons: low; ca. 16%stored easily over long periods but are expensive
Hydrogen - Climate impact - Well-to-tank
- comparatively high production efficiencies
- low global warming potential
- comparatively low water use
- comparatively low land use
Hydrogen - Climate Impact - In-Flight
- Until now: aviation contributes significantly to anthropogenic climate change
- no carbon-based in-flight emissions
- water as main product
- NOx also forms within the hydrogen combustion process (dep. on flame T, equivalence ratio, residence time…)
- large uncertainties with climate impact of non-CO2
- large uncertainties with effect of hydrogen as fuel for overall climate impact
Effects of Emissions - CO2
- long-lived greenhouse gas
- not directly emitted by a H2 aircraft
- can be emitted during H2 production
Effects of Emissions - NOx
- indirectly affects the climate by
- ↓CH4 leading to cooling effect
- ↑ozone leading to a warming effect -> net warming
. formed during combustion (& to a way lesser extent in HT FCs) - strongly dependent on combustion process design & parameters as well as fuel properties
Effects of Emissions - Hydrogen
- may need to be vented
- indirectly affects the climate by increasing in stratosphere
- ↑CH4
- ↑ozone
- ↑H2O -> net warming - significant uncertainties
Effects of Emissions - contrails/contrail cirrus
- short-lived
- affects climate by “trapping” thermal irradiation -> net warming
- potentially most significant contributor to aviation’s climate impact
- formation affected by soot & other particle emissions -> act as nucleation sites -> no soot in H2 aircraft
- affected by ambient humidity & temperature
- formation in low T ice-supersaturated air
- rerouting/intermediate water storage may allow reducing contrails - high uncertainties associated
Effects of Emissions - soot & sulfur
- affect local air quality
- affect contrail formation
In-Flight Climate Impact - Research Effort
- better understanding of aviation’s overall climate impact required
- investigations of influence of soot on contrail formation using chase aircraft
- further studies on contrail mitigation options
- emphasis on low-box combustion designs
- tool development towards adjusting aircraft design objectives towards least climate impact