Hume's Inductive Inferences & PUN Flashcards

Understanding terminology regarding Hume theory of inductive inferences and the Principle of the Uniformity of Nature

1
Q

After having derived that we can only have justified beliefs about the external world if they are formed based on a posteriori, what does Hume then question?

A

What we can know about matters of fact beyond our immediate senses and memory?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of inductive inferences (II)?

A

Singular II & Inductive Generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a singular inductive inference?

A

Using cause and effect to conclude that an object x, is a part of another object group/class (G)

P1: Every F observed thus far is a G
P2: X is an F
C: X is a G

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an Inductive Generalization?

A

Using cause and effect to generalize a statement regarding the identification of objects.

P1: Every F observed thus far is a G
C: All hitherto unobserved Fs are Gs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hume argues that we can have knowledge regarding causal relations based on what type of knowledge?

A

A posteriori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

We can have a priori justification of propositions if?

A

The negation is inconceivable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an inference?

A

The action of using experience to predict or retrodict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is PUN

A

The Principle of the Uniformity of Nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the Principle of the Uniformity of Nature imply?

A

The future will be conformable to the past, ie. it will resemble the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can PUN be justified a priori?

A

No, PUN’s negation is not inconceivable and therefor it is not justified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can PUN be justified a posteriori?

A

No, if PUN is to be assumed a posteriori justified the argument it will follow, according to Hume, will be circular.

“On all the past occasions that I observed Nature it was uniform, therefor PUN is true”
PUN is true because I saw that it was so, and because I saw it, PUN is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Hume’s argument for PUN and thereby Induction?

A

P1: Induction is justified only if PUN is justified
P2: if PUN is justified it must be justified a priori or a posteriori
P3: PUN cannot be justified a posteriori
P4: PUN cannot be justified a priori
SC: PUN cannot be justified
C: Induction is not justifed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly