Human Rights and the ECHR Flashcards
Pre-HRA
HR existed in UK through Magna Carta 1215, The Sex Discrimination Act 1975
UK relied on limitation of public bodies and the government to protect Human rights
Market of Speech
theoretical idea that where there is fake news and the truth, the truth will win
Wheeler and Other Appellants v Leicester City Council Respondents [1985]
rights such as freedom of the person and freedom of speech are an immunity from interference by others
R v SoS for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000]
“Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words…express language or necessary implication.”
- Freedom of Speech promotes self-fulfillment
- Truth is the best in the competition of market.
- It is the lifebloos of democracy.
When was HRA domesticated?
1988 UK domesticated the ECHR as the HRA 1988
Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom [1982]
The use or corporal punishment as a disciplinary measure in British state school breached the right to education
Legal implications of failure to comply with HRA
Basis for legal action
Individuals can make petitions to the ECtHR if domestic courts fail to secure an effective remedy
HRA is a constitutional statute
What are the steps of examinining an infrigment of HRA?
- What (if any) right was infringed?
- Is it in the HRA?
- What is the conflicting right/public interest?
- Balancing tests (reasonableness, proportionality)
- Remedy
Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd and Other
Art 14: prohibition from discrimination
Art 8: right to private and family life
Art 10: freedom of expression.
“What matters is that by being required to produce the cake, they were bering required to express a message with which they deeply disregard,