Human Rights Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Bartolomé de Las Casas

A

Defends human rights in trial of Valladolid (1550)

Indians

Performs “experiments” to show that these are HUMANS
Speak fluent Spanish (intelligence)
Quote the bible (shows they have souls)
Took a spear and stabbed them (showed they suffer and have pain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Francisco de Vitoria

A

First to stand for human rights

Human Rights for the Indians

Natural law: human beings, no right to abuse of mistreat them

Idea that, as a sovereign King, you can do whatever you want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1789 French Declaration of Rights of Man

A

Based in Natural Right:
rights of man are held to be universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself

Influenced by US Declaration of Independence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1791 U.S. Bill of Rights

A

Asserting Human Rights for the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minimum International Standard for Treatment of Aliens

A
Basic due process rights
1930s
	•	Quickly told what you're charged of

	•	Ability to write to a lawyer

	•	Charges written in your own language

	•	Speedy trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

A

First UN institution for HR protection

For Civil + Political Human Rights

Adopted by the General Assembly as a resolution
• Non-legally binding

• Recommendation

• Sets up a Human Rights Commission

• Non-binding
Later becomes the council


How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

René Cassin

A

Drafted the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Supported by Eleanor Roosevelt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Political & Civil Rights

International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights

A
(HRs divided to 2 parts)
Individual/personal rights:
	•	right to life
	•	liberty & security of the person
	•	freedom from discrimination
	•	arbitrary arrest
	•	interferences with privacy
	•	right to leave & enter one’s own country
	•  prohibition of slavery & torture
	•	right to vote freedom of thought
	•	peaceful assembly
	•	religion & marriage
	•	Pushed by the West (USA + EU)
	•	USA is bounded: signed and ratified




How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Economic, Social & Cultural Rights

International Covenants on Economic, Social, and Cultural rights

A
Highly contested by some western states
	•	USA signed it but didn't ratify
	•	Considered anti-capitalist
	•	right to work
	•	right to own property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

UN Binding Human Rights Law 1966

A

Some institutional support

International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights

Optional protocals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Protocol 1
UN Binding Human Rights Law 1966

Communications

A

States May Permit HR’s Committee to Consider Individual Petitions (“Communications”) Concerning ICCPR Violations; Petitioner Must First Exhaust All Local Remedies

18 experts on the committee
If the committee feels HRs has been abused, issue a report (decision) on their findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Australian Refugees Case (UN HR’s Committee, 2013)

Example of Protocol 1
UN Binding Human Rights Law 1966

Communications

A

Inhumane treatment of refugees by the State
• Special, high intensity + secure detention facilities on islands for the refugees (10 years)


Human rights group filed cases under a major communications with the UN HR’s Committee

Committee recommendation:
• Violated article 9 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) no one should be subjected to arbitration


• 

• Violated article 7 ICCPR torture or cruel, degrading, inhuman treatment/punishment



• 

• 

• refugees weren’t told the reasons for their negative security assessment 




How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

UN Human Rights Commission

Became the UN Human Rights Council in 2006

A

Membership (53 members)

Absenteeism: promoted HR and helped states write HR treaties. Didn’t investigate
-> to policy of
Interventionism: + investigate and produce reports on violations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

UN Human Rights Council 2006

•	Period reviews


Ad hoc

A

Candidacy (47 members) by reviewed by General Assembly

contribution to the promotion and protection of HR + voluntary pledges and commitments

Cant be or become a big abuser of human rights

African States: 13 seats
Asia-Pacific States: 13 seats
Latin American and Caribbean States: 8 seats
Western European and other States: 7 seats
Eastern European States: 6 seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Universal Periodic Country Reviews
(UPR)

http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/upr/pages/BasicFacts.aspx

A

Every 4 years, all members of the UN must submit to the review (not just members the council members)

•	State-driven process
•	Rapporteur
 Report describes HR situation under UN SYSTEM and if they've respecting the guidelines if they're bound by anything

Can accept it, reject it, or ignore it (no meat on the bones)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

US violations

A

Research

16
Q

China violations

A

Research

17
Q

UN Human Rights Council Ad Hoc

Special reports

A

Spur of the moment country visits
Special rapporteur

Following Gaza war (2010), massive bombing hitting UN school
Special rapporteur Justice Richard Goldstone.
99% violations of law of war were on Israel side
Wasn’t allowed into Israel to do his investigation by Israel government

18
Q

Effective of UN Human Rights a Council?

A

effectiveness? no meat on the bones

Unless it’s unconscious-able + politically charged
Security Council

looks good on paper:
adds transparency
Lacks effectiveness

Should be final and binding (and change SC voting procedure)