Human Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Buss et al. (1992)

A
  • Aim: Investigate cross-cultural differences in mate preferences.
  • Participants: Over 10,000 individuals from 37 cultures.
  • Procedure: Participants ranked the importance of various traits in potential mates.
  • Findings: Universal Preferences: Certain traits (e.g., kindness, intelligence) were universally preferred across cultures.
    • Cultural Variability: Differences in mate preferences were observed, influenced by cultural factors.
    • Gender Differences: Some preferences varied between genders, with men valuing physical attractiveness more than women.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tannen (2017)

A
  • Aim: Examined gender differences in communication styles, particularly focusing on how men and women use language in social interactions.
  • Procedure: Conducted a qualitative analysis of conversational dynamics and patterns.
    • Emphasized the role of contextual factors and societal norms in shaping communication.
  • Key Findings: Men often use communication to establish dominance and independence.
    • Women prioritize connection and rapport in their communication styles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Kurdek (1991)

A
  • Aim: Investigate the correlation between relationship duration and relationship satisfaction in homosexual couples.
  • Method: Survey of 62 gay male and 61 lesbian couples.
  • Findings: Longer relationship duration was associated with higher relationship satisfaction in lesbian couples.
    • No significant correlation was found between relationship duration and satisfaction in gay male couples.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Miller (1973)

A
  • Aim: Examine the psychological aspects of communication.
  • Findings: ntroduces the concept of “magical number seven, plus or minus two” in relation to the capacity of short-term memory.
    • Argues that humans can typically hold 5 to 9 chunks of information in their short-term memory.
    • Discusses how this capacity influences various aspects of communication, including language processing and comprehension.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Allport (1954)

A
  • Aim: To investigate the nature and development of prejudice.
  • Method: Utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods, including surveys, interviews, and observations.
  • Participants: Examined both children and adults from various social and cultural backgrounds.
  • Findings: Identified that prejudice tends to emerge early in childhood and can be influenced by various factors such as family, social environment, and personal experiences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Darley and Batson (1973)

A
  • Aim: Investigate the influence of time pressure on helping behavior and the impact of the perceived urgency of the situation.
  • Procedure: Participants were told they were part of a discussion group about personal problems.
    • Varying degrees of urgency were introduced by informing some participants they were already late, creating a high time-pressure condition.
    • A confederate (person in on the experiment) feigned distress during the discussion.
  • Results: In the high time-pressure condition, participants were less likely to offer assistance or help the distressed confederate.
    • Those with more time were more likely to provide help.
  • Conclusion: Time pressure significantly affects prosocial behavior, influencing the likelihood of individuals helping someone in distress.
    • The perceived urgency of the situation has a substantial impact on altruistic responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sime (1983)

A
  • Aim: Investigating the impact of environmental noise on task performance.
  • Method: A laboratory experiment. They had to complete a complex cognitive task.
  • Participants: Undergraduate students. Divided into high-noise and low-noise groups.
  • Results: High-noise group performed significantly worse than the low-noise group.
  • Conclusion: Environmental noise negatively influences cognitive task performance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Grant and Gino (2010)

A
  • Aim: Investigate the impact of prosocial bonuses on employee performance.
  • Method: Conducted field experiments involving participants from various organizations.
    • Examined the influence of cash bonuses and prosocial bonuses on the task performance of employees.
  • Participants: Employees from diverse job roles and industries. Involved giving participants a bonus to spend on others or a charity of their choice.
  • Results: Prosocial bonuses were found to lead to significantly higher job performance compared to cash bonuses.
    • Positive impact observed across a range of job roles and industries.
  • Conclusion: Findings suggest that prosocial incentives, where employees contribute to a social cause, can enhance employee performance more effectively than traditional cash bonuses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Toi and Batson (1982)

A
  • Aim: Investigate the role of empathy in motivating altruistic behavior.
  • Participants: Undergraduate students.
  • Method: Participants believed they were involved in a study examining the effects of personality on cognitive abilities.
    • Exposed to a confederate (another participant) who appeared to have a seizure.
  • Results: Participants in the high empathy condition were more likely to offer help to the confederate.
    • Demonstrated that empathy played a significant role in predicting altruistic behavior.
  • Conclusion: Empathy serves as a crucial motivator for altruistic behavior, evident through participants’ increased likelihood of helping when they believed the Confederate had a seizure history and showed fear.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lehnart and Neyer (2006)

A
  • Aim: Investigate the impact of personality traits on relationship satisfaction and stability.
  • Participants: Longitudinal study with a sample of German couples (N = 226 couples).
  • Method: Utilized a longitudinal design over 3 years.
  • Assessed personality traits using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), relationship satisfaction, and relationship stability.
  • Results: Found a significant association between personality traits (especially Neuroticism and Agreeableness) and relationship satisfaction.
    • Couples with high Agreeableness showed greater satisfaction and stability.
    • Neuroticism negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction and stability.
    • Emphasized the importance of considering personality factors in understanding relationship dynamics.
  • Conclusion: Personality traits, particularly Agreeableness and Neuroticism, play a crucial role in predicting relationship satisfaction and stability over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly