Human Nature Flashcards
Plato’s Rationalism
He believed that the physical world we perceive through our senses is merely an imperfect reflection of these Forms. True knowledge comes from grasping the Forms through reason and philosophical contemplation, not from sensory experience.
Realm of forms
Plato argued that through intellectual engagement and reasoning, humans can access the realm of Forms - the perfect, abstract concepts or ideals that represent true reality.
Allegory of the cave
The allegory of the cave illustrates how reason allows us to transcend the limited world of appearances and gain conceptual, abstract understanding of reality.
Descartes’ Rationalism
Descartes used reason and radical doubt to arrive at the foundational truth “I think, therefore I am” - establishing the existence of the self through pure thought alone
Descartes belief
He believed that through reason and deduction from clear and distinct innate ideas, we can gain certain knowledge about the nature of reality, including the existence of God
Descartes human mind
Descartes saw reason as a faculty that gives the human mind access to timeless, conceptual truths about the world, independent of sensory experience.
Empiricism
holds that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience. Empiricists like John Locke and David Hume argued that the mind is originally a (tabula rasa) and that ideas and knowledge come solely from observations of the external world through the senses
Rationalism
Rationalism, on the other hand, maintains that reason is the primary and most reliable source of knowledge. Rationalists like Descartes believed that the mind is born with innate ideas and that we can attain knowledge through pure reason and deduction, independent of sensory experience.
Kant’s Transcendental Idealism
Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and empiricism through his doctrine of transcendental idealism. He argued that the mind imposes certain innate structures (time, space, causality) on experience, but that empirical input is also necessary for knowledge.
Analytic vs. Synthetic
Analytic statements are true by definition (e.g. bachelors are unmarried).
Synthetic statements make claims about the world that go beyond the meaning of the terms (e.g. all bachelors are unhappy).
A Priori vs. A Posteriori
A priori means “from the former” - knowledge independent of experience.
A posteriori means “from the latter” - knowledge derived from experience.
Synthetic A Priori
For Kant, some synthetic judgments like mathematical and scientific truths are known a priori, independent of experience.
These are possible because the mind actively structures sensory input.
Kant on Human Nature
Kant argued that the mind has innate capacities (time, space, causality) that allow it to organize and make sense of experience.
These mental structures are part of our rational human nature.