Human Nature Flashcards
Introduction - Themes
- Rationality
- Individualism
- Social Justice
Introduction - Argument
Whilst all liberals agree that humans are naturally individual and rational beings deserving of equality, they differ to a certain extent over how the state and society should respond to these human qualities
Rationality - Agree - Point
Liberalism, influenced by Enlightenment thinking, has always taken a more optimistic view of human nature. At the heart of this optimistic view is the belief that individuals are guided principally by rationalism
Rationality - Disagree - Point
- Classical liberals have adopted the view that the innate rationality of humans means they are self-aware individuals and do not need state help
- Modern liberals feel that these qualities could be developed by a liberal authority
Rationality - Disagree - Example
(Classical)
John Locke argued that humans were rational and as a result need little guidance from the state. In his book, Two Treaties of Government, Locke argued that the state would embody the principle of limited government as the rationality of humankind meant a strong state was not necessary
Rationality - Disagree - Example
(Modern)
John Rawls took a different view whereby individuals’ rationality would be improved by a liberal authority. Thus, he began to promote an enlarged state to better the qualities of human nature
Individualism - Agree - Point
All liberals agree that humans are naturally individualistic. On their own individuals have huge capacity to bring about progress, and unending ability to forge greater human happiness
Individualism - Disagree - Point
- Classical liberals adopted egotistical individualism which denotes the belief that human beings are naturally drawn to the advancement of their own self interest and persuit of happiness
- Modern liberals see developmental individualism which focuses on what individuals could become rather than what they had become
Individualism - Disagree - Example
(Classical)
An example of egotisical individualism is Herbert Spencer’s principle of ‘Social Darwinism’ where those who did not enjoy the benefits of individualim would gradually be eliminated
Individualism - Disagree - Example
(Transitional)
In his book ‘On Liberty,’ John Stuart Mill asserted that huaman nature was never the finished article
Social Justice - Agree - Point
All branches are strong believers in the principles of mertiocracy - this is the belief that with enough hard work human’s have the ability to shape their destiny. Both agree that equality between all of humankind is yet to be achieved but it is possible
Social Justice - Agree - Example
Both Mary Wollstonecraft and Betty Fridan agreed that women are unfairly discriminated against and set out to challenge this ‘irrational assumption’
Social Jusitice - Disagree - Point
There are problems for certain groups of society being able to achieve their full potential, modern and classical liberals differ in how much aid should be provided in order to help those less fortunate achieve their destiny
Social Justice - Disagree - Example
(Classical)
John Stuart Mill devised the ‘Harm principle’ in which human actions were divided into ‘self-regarding’ and ‘other regarding.’ As in inequality experienced by some did not affect the freedom of other it is no the concern of the liberal state
Social Jusitice - Disagree - Example
(Modern)
John Rawls theorised the ‘veil of ignorance’ whereby if individuals were to have no preconceptions about the sort of people they might be in a new society, they would choose a society where the poorest members fared significantly better. Therefore, Rawls promoted the ideals of equality of opportunity