Human Genetics Flashcards
what are some advantages vs disadvantages to studying human genetics?
advantages:
-model system for humans
-anyone with a serious medical condition will end up at the doctor’s, which is a phenotypic detection machine
-a lot of money going into genetics research
disadvantages:
-long generation time like 25 years
-can’t choose your progeny and you have very few progeny per cross
-can’t do transgenesis
indels
insertions or deletions
polymorphism
has to be in at least 1% in the species that you’re studying
haplotype
look at a region in a chromosome in a person from today and see a similar region in an ancestor –> region on chromosome that gets passed through together
linkage equilibrium
set of ancestral alleles that are allowed to undergo meiotic recombination for many generations without any mutations
linkage disequilibrium
-very common in humans since we are a relatively young species and have not had many generations to perform recombination
what do different degrees of diversity reflect?
- population bottlenecks- drastic reduction in the size of a population leading to a decrease in genetic diversity within that population as only a small subset of the population can survive
- the time during which mutations have been accumulating
mitochondrial DNA
-passed through mom since the egg has all of the mitochondrial DNA that gets passed on
-heteroplasmy- different levels of mitochondrial DNA in each cells so only when the level reaches a certain threshold will there be phenotype penetrance
monogenic vs multigenic disease
-monogenic- one gene –> mutation in the gene, you get a phenotype
-multigenic- it could mean that to have the phenotype you need mutations in each of several genes, each of more than one gene, or it could mean that the sam phenotype can arise from individuals in each of multiple genes (series of monogenic disorders)
exome sequencing
-sequence all of the protein-coding genes
-fragment the genome –> put adaptors on the ends and PCR amplify –> take the amplified fragments and select them with synthetic DNA fragments, which each have little biotin parts to them to capture all of the chromosomal fragments that were hybridized to the synthetic DNA
exome sequencing strategy: autosomal recessive disease
-you can ask which sequence variants are shared between the two affecteds but are not present int he unaffected sibling
-if it’s a consanguineous union, you could ask not only what’s shared but what’s shared in homozygous fashion
copy number variation
-big chunk of DNA that might encompass a lot of genes
-you could have one copy of it, extra copy, or no copies
-look to see which regions are the biggest that get duplicated
GWAS
-type for markers along the genome and ask in a population that has a trait vs an ethnically matched control that doesn’t, is the ratio of alleles the same in each place in the genome?
-since you’re interrogating a million places in the genome, the chance that these two populations might differ from each other, just as a random event, is not that rare for any given polymorphic marker –> bonerferroni correction so you lower the threshold that p value has to be below for it to be statistically significant
twin studies
-pairs of people who have identical genomes are very similar
-take pairs of twins, either identical or fraternal, and within each pair you ask for some variable
-see if monozygotics have a higher correlation vs dizygotics
-if there is a higher mz value and lower dz value then there is a higher heritability score
falconer’s formula
H^2 = 2(rmz-rdz)
heritability can be determined by monozygotic or dizygotic twins
-what part of the variance of a trait is explained by genetics
hardy-weinberg equilibrium
-for people: p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1
-for alleles: p + q = 1
what does HWE assume?
-random mating
-no mutations
-no migration or gene flow
-no selection
-infinitely large population
inbreeding
-people marry and have kids with individuals who are genetically related
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
variant or minor allele that is present in the population @ a frequency of at least 1%
single nucleotide variant
site that differs from reference genome