Huge Deck Flashcards
You are a law student preparing to apply for admission to the bar. You just read the application. It asks if you have used illegal drugs in the last three years. If so, it wants details. During law school, you have smoked marijuana several times,most recently three weeks ago. You heard that if you tell the bar examiners, they will reject you. What should you do?
What rule applies?
Rule 8.1 - “An applicant for admission to the bar . . . shall not:
(a) Knowingly make a false statement of material fact; or
(b) Fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter, or knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand for information from an admissions or disciplinary authority …”
You are members of the law school Honor Board. You have been asked to hold a hearing on the case of Erica Kass, a third year law student. She has been charged with deliberately altering her resume and her law school transcript to improve her credentials.
Now that you have the allegations, we will convene as the honor board. You can interview Erica and then you can decide what to do.
What are your options and what rule applies?
Options:
- expel her from law school
- suspend her from law school for a year or two
- require her to take a course in ethics, go to counseling, or make a public apology
- public or private reprimand (to be sent to a bar admissions authorities)
Grounds for Discipline
Rule 8.4
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) Violate or attempt to violate the rules . . . knowingly assist another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice . . . .
“I’m not driving” hypo:
You see a fellow law student getting wasted on a regular basis, what should you do?
What rule applies?
Only have to report if it raises a “substainal question” of the person’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness.
Rule 8.3 - Reporting Professional Misconduct
(a) A lawyer who KNOWS that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Misconduct that raises a substantial question as to the …blah blah blah
What if the information that you feel like you should reveal in order to report professional misconduct under Rule 8.3 is also information classified as confidential under Rule 1.6.
Official Comment #2.
A report does not need to be made when revealing the information would violate Rule 1.6.
Remember confidentiality is more important than telling on someone.
Also the comment suggest lawyer’s should encourage a client to consent to disclosure where prosecution would not substantially prejudice the client’s interest
“Exculpatory Evidence” Hypo:
An old law school friend tells you after he finds out he’s dying that he suppressed evidence that would have gotten a guy off… ; )
What rule applies?
Rule 8.3(a)
A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. . . . [but a lawyer need not report client confidences.]
Official Comment #3 - not every violation has to be reported
Do you have to report professional misconduct of lawyer that you happen to be representing because of his professional misconduct?
No, normal lawyer-client relationship rules apply.
Do supervisory lawyers in a law firm have a responsibility to makes sure subordinate lawyers abide by the PR rules?
Yes under Rule 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3
- 5.1(a) - they shall make reasonable efforts to ensure the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the PR rules.
just remember REASONABLE EFFORTS
“The Little Hearing” Hypo:
A new attorney gets a job and on the second day her boss makes he show up alone at an immigration hearing in which she is totally unprepared for and he wants her to do two more hearings tomorrow. What should the new attorney do?
What rule(s) apply?
The new attorney should probably notify the judge of the situation, and make a “good faith” effort to make sure the client gets competent representation.
Rule 1.1 - Competence
- A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client.
- Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Also Rule 5.3
What rule governs client confidences?
Rule 1.6
- don’t reveal anything that could REASONABLY LEAD TO THE DISCOVERY of such confidential information
What information MAY a lawyer reveal?
Rule 1.6(b)
- a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary
- (1) to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm
- (2) & (3) if the client is involved in fraud and using your services to assist the fraud
Can a lawyer enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client?
Yes, only if the client gives informed consent. Rule 1.8
Can a lawyer counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent
No under Rule 1.2(d)
In the course of representing a client, can a lawyer make false statements of material fact or law to a third person?
No under 4.1(a)
- a lawyer shall not knowingly makes false statement of material fat or law to a third person
When shall a lawyer withdraw from representing a client?
Rule 1.16 states a lawyer shall withdraw if the representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law
According to the ruling in Togstad, when does a client-lawyer relationship begin?
When a person seeks and receives legal advice from an attorney in circumstances in which a reasonable person would rely on such advice.
What makes someone a prospective client?
Rule 1.18(a)
When the person consults with a lawyer about the possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship with respect to a matter.
Can a lawyer reveal learned information from a prospective client even when no client-lawyer relationship ensued?
Rule 1.18(b)
- No a lawyer shall not use or reveal that information except as Rule 1.9 would permit with respect to information of a former client
When can a lawyer continue employment in a legal matter when he knows he is incompetent?
Rule 1.01
When another competent lawyer is also handling the matter
In emergency situations and the lawyer only limits the advice to what is reasonably necessary
Must a lawyer promptly inform a client of any decision or circumstances in regards to their representation?
Yes under Rule 1.4 - Communication
(a)(1) - lawyer shall promptly inform client…
Must a lawyer reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished?
Yes under Rule 1.4(a)(2)
Must a lawyer keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter?
Yes under Rule 1.4(a)(3)
Must a lawyer promptly comply with reasonable requests for information?
Yes under Rule 1.4(4)
Must a lawyer consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the PR rules or other law?
Yes under Rule 1.4(5)
To what extent does a lawyer have to explain information about a matter to the client?
Under 1.4(b)
- to the extent that is reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation