HRA Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Marleasing

A

Lending from the ECJ would give a very broad interpretation of s3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Magor and St Mellens RDC

A

Denning took a purposive/teleological approach to s3 of the HRA when traditional techniques would not render the interpretation Convention Right compliant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v R (marital rape exemption)

A

The CL must also change to keep in line with C. Rights but note there is no express mention of this in the Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dawkins v Antrobus

A

Many CL rules are as enforceable against companies or individuals as against gvt bodies - the private sector is not amenable to JR in a direct sense but there is a broad notion of what is ‘governmental’ in nature including acts of clubs and societies – this does not seem to be the case for Convention rights however

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Goodwin v United Kingdom

A

What was ostensibly a horizontal action at the ECtHR - the judgment explained that a state may be in breach of the Convention is its laws allows individuals to invoke legal protections which unacceptable hamper other individuals’ access to rights identified by the Convention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

X and Y v The Netherlands

A

Another horizontal action, where the Court held that Art 8 imposed an obligation on the Netherlands to introduce such a law so as to protect the individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Malone v UK

A

Again, horizontal effect of the state’s first step being to introduce domestic law which corrects the aggravating element that is affecting an individual’s C. rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dudgeon v United Kingdom

A

Standing requirements are certainly more expansive but also more ambiguous, here they would have had standing whereas they didn’t at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Klass v Germany

A

The Court said that it would not allow procedural questions to frustrate achievement of the Convention’s substantive objectives – liberal interpretation of Art 25

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Secretary of State for the Home Dept, ex p Simms

A

Rather than revolution it seems to have been continued innovation for the courts — use for conclusion - Lord Steyn concluded that the CL had absorbed Art 10 rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reynolds v Times Newspapers

A

It is clear that the CL was indeed developing but the HRA legitimised such developments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly