HR Planning & Recruitment Flashcards

1
Q

Outsourcing:

A

A situation where a client company recruits an outside company to provide a service the client company would normally provide itself.

IBM taking over computer department in a client company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Offshoring:

A

When a company lets a firm somewhere far away provide it with manufacturing services or knowledge based services.

Apple headquartered in CA, but offshores manufacturing in China.

Goals:

  • lower the costs of labor
  • lower the costs of production & distribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reshoring:

A

The practice of bringing elements of production back to the country of origin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nearshoring:

A

Sort of like reshoring, a company in the US may find that the timezone changes in dealing with a company in India etc, can be so daunting, or cultural and language differences are a problem, so companies are thinking of nearshoring. Bringing the work to lower cost countries but nearer to the client zoned base. IE, mexico & south america.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

BPO & KPO:

A

BPO: business process outsourcing. customer service phone line in India etc.

KPO: knowledge process outsourcing. Accounting & tax return prepping, planning etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Boston Consulting Group video.

Why is HR planning so important?

A

Talent management.
Leadership development.
Employee engagement.
Strategic workforce planning.

Now and into the future, people are firms most scarce resources. Recruiting & retaining employees is more difficult than buying technology. Firms in the developed world are having labor shortages for leadership/high skill jobs. Over supply in developing world.
Creating people advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is HR planning tied to strategic management?

A

HR planning –> strategic management –> people advantage –> competitive advantage.

HR needs to become more analytical and strategic. HR will be where you define your competitive advantage via people advantage.

HR planning should be a strategic function. HR planning that is more strategic than operational is longer-range, it is more flexible than fixed, and it requires resource commitments. It should flow directly from a firm’s business strategy and its broader HR strategy. In fact, you might recall from our discussion on strategic management and HR strategy that HR planning is in fact part of the strategic management process.
Forecasting labor demand is part of a firm’s external analysis, which is part of a larger SWOT analysis that is necessary for strategic planning. The strategic planning process in general determines a firm’s talent-related needs, which then influence the implementation of a firm’s strategic plan vis a vis HR policies and practices. So HR planning really is a strategic function, assuming it is done as part of a larger strategic management function. HR managers are often responsible for HR planning, but in many organizations, especially those that are decentralized, line managers are responsible as well. To avoid the process being too fixed, it may be important that HR planning be democratic, involving input and responsibility from HR and line managers. That said, in small firms, line managers are often responsible for HR planning themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HR Planning - professors definition, powerpoint slide

A

Also known as workforce planning or strategic workforce planning, can be thought of as processes and practices used to ensure that individuals with the KSAOs are in place at the right time to meet an organization’s current and future labor force needs.

In other words, HR planning helps firms to develop plans and strategies for addressing labor supply and demand, as well as avoiding and mitigating labor shortages and surpluses.

HR planning can include a variety of dimensions including:

  • talent inventories
  • workforce forecasts
  • action plans
  • program evaluations

We need HR planning for organizations to be effective and efficient, to follow EEO requirements and also to support the KSAs of employees as well as the work that employees and their managers are doing on a day-to-day basis. HR planning is important in terms of making sure operating budgets are adhered to, and will directly affect a company’s effectiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 Stages in HR Planning Process:

A
  1. Forecasting: forecasting labor supply and demand for various positions. The main purpose in this stage of the planning process is to make useful predictions about where there will be future labor surpluses and shortages so as to be able to avoid them or to develop plans for remedying them.
  2. Goal Setting & Strategic Planning: Once forecasts have been made, the second step in the HR planning process is to set specific, quantitative goals for increasing or decreasing human resource units (i.e., people) in different positions across a specified period of time.
  3. Program implementation & evaluation: This is the last step in the HR planning process. There are a variety of competitive pressures that can impact HR planning, and these need to be considered vis a vis a firm’s business and HR strategies as well as the HR planning process. These can include, for instance, expansion into new markets, mergers & acquisitions, industry trends and economic factors, as well as actions of competitors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Forecasting Stage of HR Planning - Determining Labor DEMAND

A

Predictions about labor demand are usually done around specific jobs or skill categories. As you may recall from the unit on work design, work can be thought of and organized around either jobs or skills. Recent research – the Differentiated Workforce - suggests that firms should focus on those jobs or skillsets that are key to the organization’s success. The information that needs to be gathered and analyzed is used to predict whether demand will increase or decrease for a particular position in the future. With forecasting, organizations will typically use multiple methods to forecast – including both statistical and judgmental methods. In terms of determining labor demand, firms (usually larger, more sophisticated firms) will use sophisticated statistical models to predict labor demand. Leading indicators are essentially variables that explain a significant portion of variance in labor demand. In other words, they are objective measures that predict changes in demand. Leading indicators, like any variable in a statistical analysis, are not perfectly reliable. Moreover, there are sometimes events for which there isn’t a very good precedent and thus there really isn’t a very good leading indicator to try to predict what will happen in the future with. As such, pooled judgment of experts (e.g., HR practitioners and managers) will be used to try to predict labor demand.

Predicting labor demand, statistical method vs judgmental method: statistical – leading indicators to forecast labor demand. Leading indicators may not be perfect, economy and labor change etc, so statistical methods aren’t always perfect so you complement them with judgmental methods, ie experience and knowledge of HR managers. Leading indicator is a variable that is highly predictive, highly correlated with labor demand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Forecasting Stage of HR Planning - Determining Labor SUPPLY

A

Once a firm has determined the demand for labor, it then needs to determine the supply of labor for various, perhaps key, positions. Since labor supply is mostly from within a firm, at least for existing positions, the analysis is one of internal labor supply, which can be generated through statistical or judgmental methods, just as with determining labor demand. Predictions will need to take into consideration various staffing and HR metrics, such as retirements, promotions, transfers, turnover and terminations. One useful type of statistical (well, at least data-driven) method is the Transitional Matrix. These show the proportion of employees in different, usually related, jobs at a given point in time. The matrix illustrates and can be used to understand how individuals move from one status to another, for instance from outside the firm to a specific job, or from a specific job (e.g., sales rep) to another job (e.g., sales manager). It simply shows proportions of individuals in different jobs and in so doing allows an HR analyst to understand movement into and out of these jobs. Transitional matrices are useful for both charting historical trends and also making plans about the future – but this assumes that trends in the future will be constant or similar to the past. One can easily look at a transitional matrix and see where labor supply for a particular job is coming from and then choose to change, modify supply from a given source and expect that the supply will then change by a proportion or percentage that is indicated by that source. The transition matrix is useful for affirmative action and EEO purposes because it tells you where you are getting your labor supply from, and you can estimate the numbers or proportions of persons from various backgrounds in these sources. In this connection, a workforce utilization review is a comparison of the proportion of a firm’s workers in a particular subgroup within a particular job or occupation with the relevant outside labor market to determine if persons in that subgroup (e.g., Hispanics or Women) are being under-utilized. Under-utilization occurs when there proportion of persons in a subgroup in the labor market is to some degree larger than that in the particular job or occupation. A very important point here is that firms are increasingly in competition with other firms for limited amounts of talented workers. Thus, competitors are an important benchmark when it comes to looking at labor supply. Besides a transitional matrix, other important sources of information about labor supply can come from department or division managers, industry growth projections, educational institutions and government agencies (such as the Department of Labor and, more specifically, the Bureau of Labor Statistics). More sophisticated firms may also have talent inventories, which are databases with employee records, which included their KSAs, their interests and career goals. An analysis of internal labor supply – and talent inventories – are important when it comes to succession planning, which is the identification of employees who can be successors for important or high-level positions. It is important to note that firms do not only look internally to think of where labor comes from. Firms must choose whether to source labor internally or externally, and each option can have pros and cons. For instance, current employees may require training and development to move into a position, but going external can require recruiting and other additional costs.

Predicting labor supply, what is a transitional matrix? Shows the proportion of employees in different jobs at a given point in time and those jobs are related. Whole foods jobs, looking at proportions of those jobs and how people are moving into and out of those jobs, and levels, across time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Forecasting Stage of HR Planning - Determine Labor Surplus or Shortage

A

Once forecasts for labor demand and supply are known, the planner can compare the figures to ascertain whether there will be a labor shortage or labor surplus for the respective job categories. When this is determined, the organization can determine what it is going to do about these potential problems. By comparing forecasts for labor supply and demand for specific jobs, the organization can determine what it needs to do in terms of avoiding and remedying labor surpluses and shortages. There are a variety of alternative methods for addressing surpluses and shortages, which will be considered next.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Goal Setting & Strategic Planning step in HR Planning:

A

Once predictions around labor demand and supply have been estimated, it is important – necessary – to set goals for the future and for the rest of the HR planning process. These goals need to be aligned with the firm’s business and HR strategies, which will be related to the firm’s workforce needs, as well as predictions about surpluses and shortages. For instance, if a firm’s business strategy changes to place an emphasis on customer service, it will be important to change the HR strategy to emphasize and support customer service. This will require changes to various HR policies and practices. For instance, job descriptions could be changed to emphasize customer service aspects of various jobs. It may be the case that goals would need to be set for new jobs that support the new higher-level strategies, or that an re-orientation around moving from internal staffing to external staffing for key customer service positions. The point here is that goal setting and planning needs to be related to and supportive of higher-level strategies, not just predictions about labor shortages and surpluses. These specific goals will provide targets for planning, as well as benchmarks for success. In other words, in the program implementation and evaluation phase, the firm can look back to these goals to analyze the extent to which they were successfully addressed so as to determine the extent to which the planning process was successful. The firm will need to set specific quantitative goals as to the numbers of proportions of workers needed in specific jobs and from specific sources. To do so, various methods for avoiding or reducing labor surpluses and shortages will need to be considered. These methods differ on a number of important dimensions, and they each have tradeoffs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Options for Reducing Expected Labor Surplus

A

Methods differ in the speed by which they can be implemented, as well as the extent of human suffering that is likely to be encountered. For instance, downsizing is fast, which is generally good for the firm, but human suffering can be high for workers, for communities and even for employees who remain with the firm. In contrast, other methods are fast but with lower human suffering, such as work sharing. Work sharing is when a firm adopts a shorter work week with less pay for each worker, which is a situation which workers generally share in. In this way, each worker’s pay is reduced, but the firm can avoid layoffs.

Other methods, such as early retirement, have relatively little human suffering, but need to be planned for far in advance because they are much slower in terms of implementation. Given that downsizing is so common, and since early retirements are increasingly being considered by firms, let’s consider each of these in a bit more detail.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Downsizing:

A

Downsizing is the planned elimination of large numbers of workers so as to enhance a firm’s organizational effectiveness. There are a variety of reasons why firms might plan to downsize, which could include reducing labor costs, changes in technology that reduce the need for labor (such as the case with robotics, for instance, or automated technologies more generally), mergers and acquisitions wherein classes of workers are downsized, such as middle-management, and firm’s relocating to other locations, for instance, to do business more cheaply. Many U.S. firms have gone through downsizing for these reasons, and many of them have done so to offshore work to other countries. Downsizing can have a short-term benefit in terms of a drastic reduction in costs and therefore the firm may appear more profitable to analysts. Most firms (80%) say that they went through a downsizing to lower costs and increase profits. That said, there is a large amount of evidence that downsizing can hurt firms in the long-run. Downsizing is often done in a non-strategic way. That is, reductions are often across-the-board, where entire classes of workers may be let go. Instead, it is useful to carefully consider which workers should be let go based on which jobs are key to a business’ strategy, and which workers have key talent based on, for instance, previous performance appraisals. In this sense, downsizing can be more surgical so to speak. Other problems often surface related to, for instance, loss of key talent and institutional knowledge, as well as reduced job attitudes and performance among workers who remain with the firm. Downsizing can also hurt a firm’s image and attractiveness, thus damaging its ability to recruit qualified workers. Downsizing seems to be particularly damaging to firms that engage in high performance work practices, that are R&D-oriented, or for service-oriented, high customer contact businesses. One study of 52 Fortune 100 firms shows that most firms that announce a downsizing campaign show worse, rather than better, financial performance. Human suffering is also a consideration, and human suffering can be high in both the short- and long-term. For instance, employees who are downsized will obviously have to find new employment, which has high costs, and employees who remain with the organization may also have negative experiences related to guilt about the downsizing and anxiety about employment security. Downsizing obviously needs to be done in a very deliberate, strategic and careful way so as to maximize benefits to the firm and reduce adverse outcomes to workers. Downsizing – and offshoring – were very much the center of attention in the 80’s and into the 90’s with U.S. auto manufacturers, such as General Motors in Flint, Michigan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Early Retirement Programs:

A

As we all know, the average age of the U.S. workforce is increasing. This is due to both the “greying of the workforce”, or the increasingly large proportion of older workers in the workforce, as well as the increasingly low proportion of younger workers and low fertility rates in the U.S. and other industrialized societies. Older workers in the U.S. are choosing to work longer for various reasons including longer lifespan and improved health, fears about retirement income including social security, the fact that mandatory retirement is illegal, and of course to the volatility of various markets and thus changes to housing prices and also the security of retirement investments and income. Thus, when firms are facing labor surpluses in certain positions and these positions are comprised of some proportion of older workers, it is important to consider voluntary retirement programs through, for instance, retirement incentives. Yes, these cost money, but in certain cases it may be more useful, including more cost-effective, to convince certain workers to retire early than it would be for them to be on payroll due to their relatively high salaries and benefits costs. Of course, it is ideal to try to incentivize lower-performing workers to retire while making efforts to retain those workers who contribute the most. It is also important that early retirement programs be connected to successful HR planning. Many firms have had to hire-back workers who had chosen to go on early retirement due to loss of talent and unexpected labor shortages, which can be very costly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Options for Avoiding Expected Labor Shortage

A

Next, let’s consider options for avoiding an expected labor shortage. As with options for addressing a labor shortage, these options carry with them both pros and cons. They vary according to how quickly they can be implemented, and faster implementation is usually better for addressing a labor surplus, as well as revocability, and relatively high revocability is in the best interest of employers. For instance, if demand for a particular product or service increases unexpectedly, and there is an increased and immediate need for more labor, overtime may be useful. This can be implemented quickly and it is high on revocability. In this same situation, technological innovation wouldn’t be useful because it is too slow to implement. Hiring temporary workers could be an option as well, and this option is similar to overtime in that it is quickly implemented and high on revocability. That said, it may be more costly to hire temporary workers given the need to recruit, train and go through a process of hiring – depending on how much wages are and what overtime costs would be. So in this sense, it is important for firms to plan carefully for labor shortages and to have strategies for avoiding or addressing them with different contingencies and options.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Employing temporary workers

A

Some strategies can be turned on and off fairly painlessly, such as the use of overtime and/or temporary employees. Operational flexibility is the primary reason for this, although the use of temps also frees the firm from many administrative tasks and financial burdens (health insurance, pension, worker’s compensation, life insurance, etc.). Smaller companies may use temporary agencies to do their employment screening for them. Training may be done by the agency as well. Temporary employees bring a fresh perspective to the firm, particularly if they have temped in a number of other organizations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Outsourcing & Offshoring

A

Outsourcing: occurs when a firm uses an outside firm for a broad set of services. This makes sense when the firm doesn’t have the expertise required to perform the work necessary to produce a certain product or service or a certain piece of that product or service. Cost savings in this area are easily obtained because rather than purchase and maintain their own specialized hardware and software, as well as specialized staff to support such systems, companies can time share the facilities and expertise of a firm that focuses on this technology.
Offshoring: a special case of outsourcing where the jobs that move actually leave one country and go to another. Globalization and the increased levels of literacy and education in developing countries has made non-domestic labor increasingly attractive to firms in industrialized societies. A larger labor supply can be accessed, and workers can be “on” 24/7.

Outsourcing and offshoring are, in general, controversial. While firms look to lower labor and production costs by outsourcing, many workers and their representatives, such as professional associations and unions, as well as politicians have raised concerns in particular about offshoring domestic jobs to low-paying – and sometimes less productive – countries. One point here is that offshoring to reduce costs doesn’t always work. There are often serious and sometimes unexpected complications associated with vendors, with labor productivity and with legal issues when offshoring. Another point here is that cheaper labor isn’t always better; it doesn’t necessarily result in higher productivity or profits. For productivity and thus profits to be higher, the work output must be consistently high while the labor costs must be consistently low. Work output in low-paying countries isn’t always what multinational companies would want or expect.

Here’s an example of offshoring resulting in a failure, which is from a story in Forbes:

“Dell moved product support for business accounts back to the U.S. It seems some customers were not happy with the prior arrangement”.

Steps to take that help ensure the success of outsourcing strategies include:
-When choosing an outsourcing vendor, it is usually the bigger and older the better.
Jobs that are proprietary or require tight security should not be outsourced.
-It is a good idea to start small and monitor constantly.

20
Q

HR Planning - Program Implementation & Evaluation

A

The final stage in HR planning is to implement and then evaluate the plans that were developed in the earlier stages of planning. Although this takes up a relatively small portion of the relevant textbook chapter, this is obviously a major undertaking. An important point here is that progress needs to be consistently monitored and HR leaders need to be aware of the progress being made towards achieving the goals of the HR planning process. In this sense, the goals and timetables that were set forth in the earlier stages of HR planning will serve as an important benchmark for monitoring progress. As with any other strategy implementation process, strategies will need to be evaluated in terms of their successes and failures, and they may need to be re-considered and re-developed so as to enhance success. It is important to reiterate here that HR planning – the goals, strategies and timetables – need to support higher-level HR and business strategies. Time horizons are very important in this sense and are an essential part of the HR planning process. It is important to have both short- and long-term objectives and time horizons.
Some criteria that may be considered in HR planning include:
-turnover and turnover costs
-salary-to-profit ratio
-benefits

21
Q

Employee Retention

A

Since HR planning has so much to do with turnover, with labor supply and with staffing, it is relevant to discuss employee retention issues alongside HR planning. Indeed, employee retention is important to HR planning – and professionals involved in HR planning need to be aware of and try to anticipate potential issues with employee retention, including employee job attitudes and voluntary and involuntary turnover. Voluntary turnover is when an employee chooses to leave a firm on his or her own accord, and involuntary turnover is initiated by the firm (generally with an employee who would otherwise want to stay with the firm). Your textbook – and this course – do not have a formal segment on what one could call employee relations or labor management relations. The former terms is a sort of general HR term for professionals that are responsible for making sure that employee concerns, complaints are addressed, that their job attitudes are monitored, and that any issues with coworkers or managers are handled successfully. The latter term means essentially something very similar, but is generally used to refer to a unionized context. In the United States, we have an employment-at-will doctrine, which essentially means that, barring an employment contract, employers and employees can sever an employment relationship at any time for any reason (except, of course, a discriminatory reason or motive). This is important to consider for a variety of reasons, including that employees may impute or attribute employer’s motives when employment decisions are made regarding one’s own employment or the employment of those around him or her.

22
Q

Organizational Justice

A

Organizational Justice =

  • distributive justice: fairness of outcome.
  • procedural justice: fairness of outcome process.
  • interactional justice: being treated with dignity and respect.

In the last slide, we talked about employees attributing motives to employers (and managers) when employment decisions are made. Employment decisions are generally made vis a vis some process or procedure. For instance, performance appraisal ratings are determined via a performance appraisal process; termination decisions are usually made vis some sort of decision making process; staffing decisions are made based on processes that involve considerations of previous performance, labor supply and demand and so on. The point is that employees do not always know the details of a process and they are not always privy to the motivations, judgments and criteria used in the process. Employees develop perceptions of organizational justice about organizational processes– these are overall perceptions of the extent to which a process, or even an organization writ large, is fair and just. This omnibus perception is influenced by three types of justice, one of them with two sub-types: Distributive, Procedural and Interactional, which is comprised of both interpersonal and informational justice. Distributive justice is refers to one’s perception of fairness as to the distribution of the outcome. Equity theory is very influential here. It says that we compare our ratio of inputs to outputs against relevant others, such as coworkers. If our ratio is in some way adverse to us, such as when one receives a lower performance rating than a colleague, despite one’s perception of equal performance. Distributive justice can also be conceptualized more simply: if we feel like we received an outcome that we didn’t deserve, our perception of distributive justice will be low. Research has shown that when these perceptions are low in the specific case that employees feel that they got less than they deserved, they will try to make up for this loss, such as through employee theft or sabotage, or they otherwise will reduce their inputs (e.g., they will exert less effort). When employees feel that they got more than they deserved, their inputs generally do not change. Procedural justice perceptions refer to the extent to which a particular process is viewed as fair. This is a separate dimension of justice than the outcome. Processes can be viewed as fair or unfair based on certain criteria – such as whether or not the process was consistently applied across different employees – or based on the extent to which employees were involved in the process that was used to arrive at a decision. If processes are inconsistent or biased in some way, or if employees had very little voice in the procedure, then procedural justice perceptions will be relatively low. Perceptions of interactional justice refer to how employees were treated in the process– more specifically in terms of interpersonal treatment and the extent to which information given about the process and decision were adequate. When one believes that one was treated with dignity and respect, perceptions of interpersonal justice will be high. Likewise, when one believes that one was given adequate information about how a decision was arrived at, perceptions of informational justice will be high. Organizational justice perceptions are important because they predict job attitudes, motivation, job performance and discrimination claiming. Each different type of justice can enhance or mitigate the effects of the other; in this sense, they act as substitutes. So, for instance, if one believes that one received an unfair performance rating, one will react more negatively if the process used to arrive at the decision was biased and unfair (perhaps a manager gave better ratings to persons whom he or she likes). Conversely, one will react more positively if the process was fair and unbiased (the process therefore can’t be the cause of the rating, and thus it is perceived as more fair). It is paramount to managing employee relations and to retention to monitor perceptions of fairness in the workplace. When employees feel they have been treated unfairly, they will generally respond in undesirable ways, from voluntary turnover, which is highly undesirable among high performers especially, reduced job performance or even through counterproductive, reparative types of behavior.

23
Q

Progressive Discipline & ADR:

A

When it comes to managing employee relations, perceptions of justice and retention, it is very important to consider how employees are treated in terms of discipline. In the United States, we have a legal system based on due process and principles of fairness, which means in practice that individuals should be able to defend themselves, that proceedings should be based on evidence, and that punishments should fit crimes. Often, the principles of our legal system apply to employment systems. This is the case with progressive discipline, which prescribes that, except in rare cases, individuals will not be terminated on the first offense for a given wrongdoing. Progressive discipline requires that employers document disciplinary procedures and related issues (so, for instance, disciplinary decisions should be based on published documents, such as job descriptions, employee handbooks and so on), as well as a system of progressively severe discipline, with steps that have been very clearly communicated and documented. A first offense could involve a verbal warning and a witness. A second could involve a written warning and documentation filed. Later offenses could involve “last notices” and termination. At various points in the process, each party may want to involve an outside party, which could be legal counsel or an alternative dispute resolution procedure. Today, many employers are looking to ADR as an alternative to the legal process. ADR involves four stages. As one moves through these stages, there is a broader involvement of people. The 1. first step is an open door policy where two disputants try to arrive at a settlement together, such as a supervisor and subordinate. If an agreement is not reached, 2. a panel that is comprised of persons from the same levels as those in the dispute will hear facts about the case and try to help the parties reach an agreement. If this process is not successful, 3. a neutral third party from outside the firm will hear each party in the dispute and then, in a nonbinding way, try to help the parties reach a settlement. If this is not successful, 4. then an arbitrator – usually an attorney, retired judge or someone with an extensive legal background – will hear the case and will usually resolve the situation by making a binding, unilateral decision. Progressive discipline is meant to ensure that organizational processes and decisions around discipline and termination are transparent, fair – that they are perceived positively by employees. They are also meant to limit or mitigate the extent to which legal proceedings – lawsuits – are sought as a means of remedying disputes.

24
Q

Job Dissatisfaction / Job Withdrawal Process

A

Organizational justice perceptions can be thought of as employee evaluations of the extent to which their employer is fair. These are related to a variety of important criteria, which we discussed, including turnover. Research has shown that turnover isn’t the only – or maybe even the most important – criterion we are interested in when it comes to employee evaluations of their work setting: Job withdrawal, which occurs when an employee disengages from work and is a broader set of phenomena, is just as important because of how costly it can be. Job dissatisfaction has been found to be a major predictor of job withdrawal and organizational justice perceptions are at least moderately correlated with job dissatisfaction. Remember from your OB class that job dissatisfaction is not a different construct than job satisfaction, it just means really low job satisfaction. The Job Dissatisfaction-Job Withdrawal Model, in its essence, is a process model or a theory of a progression of withdrawal. That is, various correlates of causes of dissatisfaction cause dissatisfaction, which then starts the withdrawal process. Later, manifestations of withdrawal may be observable, which include behavioral change, physical job withdrawal and psychological job withdrawal. Behavior change could be, for instance, voice behaviors, which could be constructive or destructive. In other words, employees may raise voice about their concerns about their job, work conditions or the causes of their dissatisfaction. Physical withdrawal is when an employee physically leaves a job – perhaps through a transfer or through turnover. Psychological job withdrawal can take the form of less job involvement, less commitment to the job, which will likely result in less productive behaviors, such as job performance and citizenship behaviors.

25
Q

War for Talent video

A

7 imperatives

  • Globalization: it’s here, unstoppable
  • Knowledge worker: the new rock star. the person we all need
  • Nature of work is changing: we are all temps now, lifetime employment is gone
  • More free agents: sometimes 50% want to be a free agent
  • Shift from HR 1.0 to 3.0: WWII/personnel/transactional to transitional to transformational. HR has to be focused on getting migrated up value chain
  • CEOs need/demand HR to be as good at business as they are good at HR
  • War for Talent: we are mopping up now, 2000 War for Talent by McKinsey. It’s already over, talent won. We as employers are now on the back foot, we are competing for a shrinking supply of talent. Not a shortage of people, but a shortage of talent.

War for Talent and Free agent merge to create great opportunities, such as? How & where work is done.

Because the nature of work has changed, work can be anywhere.

26
Q

What is War for Talent?

A

At a high level it means that many if not most business organizations need talented – highly qualified, motivated and able – individuals and teams to be successful, but there is generally little supply of such individuals for firms to choose from and thus firms must compete fiercely in a war for winning over and retaining talent. This may seem somewhat surprising to you for a number of reasons. For instance, why would any employer of choice – a firm that is sought after by workers due to its attractiveness in terms of reputation, culture, benefits and so on – need to worry about competing with other firms? Aren’t these types of firms already in a sort of winning position? Even the most attractive, highly visible, highly reputable firms need to make serious investments in finding the right talent for the various types of work that need to be done successfully to make the firm competitive and profitable– and to do so means competing with other firms. As another example, you may think back to the recent great recession. Isn’t there a relatively large supply of workers during a recession? Yes, there is, but this doesn’t mean that these workers are the types of workers we are looking for necessarily– they may not be qualified for the types of positions a particular firm needs to or is planning to fill. So today, firms that want the best talent are forced to consider what their value proposition is: what is it that makes them unique in terms of what they offer to employees in terms of an employment relationship? This is a notion we will return to when we talk about compensation, one that you are surely familiar with if you read the case study on Google that was part of this unit’s reading. Developing and leveraging a value proposition is particularly important for firms that are interested in the types of KSAOs that are relatively more valuable or unique, such as hospitals looking for doctors or aerospace firms looking for engineers. One might say it is important to first determine what a firms’ value proposition is before developing and implementing strategies and practices around HR planning and recruitment. HR planning and recruitment are the processes that help a firm to determine what its needs are in terms of talent, and how to get access to and try to obtain that talent. You might think of HR planning as a sort of plan for a pipeline for the talent that a firm needs, and recruitment as an ongoing process for maintaining and developing that pipeline.

27
Q

Purpose of Recruitment

A

We are still in the “Acquisition and Preparation of Human Resources” phase of the HR process. Although recruitment is an ongoing process, HR planning should precede recruitment in the sense that a firm and its managers need to know what types of labor are needed so as to recruit effectively. What does it mean that “recruitment is an ongoing process”? It means that a firm should be recruiting essentially all the time, regardless of whether or not there is a specific opening. Firms need to constantly be getting the message out about the types of opportunities they have and what their value position is- even when there is not a specific vacancy to be filled. What is recruitment then?
Recruitment is “activities that will identify potential employees, communicate job and organizational attributes to them and convince them to apply”.
We are recruiting by communicating not only information about the types of positions we might need to fill, but also information about our organization– its personnel policies, culture, vision and mission and so on. The point is that any given employer wants the labor force to always be keeping that firm in mind when thinking about employment. Also, employers want individuals to be not only qualified for a particular type of position, but a good fit for the firm. An important way to help achieve this is to communicate information about the firm and what it is like to work at that firm, as we will see later in this unit. The real goal of recruitment is to find qualified individuals who have the KSAOs that match certain jobs and to convince them to apply. We need them to apply so that we can get access to information to assess the extent to which they may in fact be a good fit. Note here that recruitment does not involve making assessments about qualifications or fit – this is done later in personnel selection. We will talk about selection ratios later, but for now it is important to note that it is in a firm’s best interest to get as many qualified individuals as possible to apply to a particular position. the goal of recruitment is to ensure that when a vacancy occurs, the organization has a number of reasonably qualified applicants to choose from.
Recruiting is a high value-added type of activity– most firms can not succeed without access to talent, and recruiting is the method by which we get this access. That said, recruiting, when effective, allows managers to focus on their value-added activities. Recruitment takes a lot of time, resources and energy, and there are entire areas of HR including staffs devoted entirely and solely to recruitment. Any manager who has tried to fill an important position knows how much effort recruitment is– and how distracting it can be when an important position is vacant.

28
Q

Random recruiting percentages

A

31% said it’s difficult or very difficult to attract broadly. 18% said it’s difficult for entry-level. Org’s in every aprt of the world are facing challenges hiring people with critical skills to their success–more than 70% of companies. People that are high potential – 60%. With regard to top performers in industry, 59%.

29
Q

Recruitment Process

A
  1. Decide on the objective for the recruiting process.
  2. Familiarize oneself with the job duties and requirements of the position(s).
  3. Identify the best sources for recruitment.
  4. Craft the recruitment message & implement.
  5. Evaluate
    - In small business, managers are involved in all stages. In large businesses, recruiters take the lead.

You will find that in the “real world” firms will vary in terms of what their recruitment process is – and some firms may not have a process per se. You will also find that some firms will include selection as part of their recruitment process when describing recruitment, which is technically not very helpful in the sense that these are interrelated but separate processes. So, for instance, Wikipedia describes recruitment as a process involving job analysis, sourcing and then screening and selection. This isn’t technically correct because job analysis and selection are not part of recruitment and recruitment is much broader than just sourcing talent. In general, the more process-oriented recruitment is, which is to say the more planned, organized, consistent it is, the more likely it is to be effective. As a suggested process, I would say that first things first, the objective(s) of the recruiting process may come first in the sense that objectives will be determined by an HR strategy at a high level, HR planning and the larger recruitment strategy for a particular firm. You should familiarize yourself very carefully with the position or the types of positions you are going to be recruiting for. As above, a given position may not be vacant, but you need to have as complete information as possible when talking about a particular type of position, otherwise a candidate will feel like you as a recruiter aren’t professional and may become disinterested. The source of recruitment or recruitment method should be determined by the objectives for the process and the types of positions one is recruiting for, and then the message should be crafted, which refers back to our value proposition. For instance, an executive search firm – a third party vendor – may be necessary to help a firm recruit a CHRO or VP of HR. Firms should always measure and evaluate their HR activities, and recruitment is no exception. Of course, most firms don’t evaluate their recruitment in a programmatic way, but this is important so as to determine where to improve. You will obviously be aware now that recruitment is broader than just sourcing. In smaller firms, managers – that is, line managers – are largely responsible for all of these steps in the recruitment process. In larger firms, these activities are generally lead by HR professionals.

30
Q

HR Recruitment Influences

A

The goal of recruitment is to ensure that when a vacancy occurs, the organization has a number of reasonably qualified applicants to choose from. All companies have to make decisions in three areas of recruiting:

(1) personnel policies, which affect the kinds of jobs the company has to offer;
(2) recruitment sources used to solicit applicants, which affect the kinds of people who apply; and
(3) the characteristics and behaviors of the recruiter.

These, in turn, influence both the nature of the vacancies and the nature of the people applying for jobs in a way that shapes job choice decisions. Obviously, firms can’t make decisions about applicant characteristics- these aren’t malleable. Nor can job choice be decided by the firm – but job choice certainly can be affected by a particular fir and its recruitment methods. What is job choice first of all? Job choice is an individual’s decision to accept an offer of employment. Usually we think of job choice as a “choice”- that is, individuals will have more than a single opportunity. Thinking back to our War on Talent, it is in a firm’s best interest that qualified applicants who become selected for offers of employment choose that firm over other firms. This is what competition in the War for Talent is all about – we want to be able to attract and actually bring on board the “best and brightest” or, at least, persons qualified to perform the jobs we are recruiting for. The characteristics of the particular job itself will affect job choice. That is, the responsibilities, work conditions and so on at a given firm, Firm X, will differ somewhat from those at another firm, Firm Y, and individuals will choose an opportunity with the most attractive characteristics all else equal. That said, characteristics of the firm, in terms of its employment policies, as well as characteristics of recruiters, will impact perceptions of the vacancy as well. We will talk in more detail about employment policies in just a moment, but as an example, many but not all individuals will prefer a firm that has a strong internal labor market, which is to say it recruits from within its own ranks. As we will see later, recruiters who are perceived as attractive by an applicant in the sense that they are similar to the applicant can enhance the way a vacancy is perceived in the sense that the vacancy will be perceived more positively. It should be noted here that different recruitment sources can impact applicant characteristics, which is no surprise, which can impact job choice. The point here is that recruitment sources can impact job choice and thus the success of our recruitment process. Research, including research that I have done at Cal State, Fullerton, shows that perceptions of fit are important when it comes to job choice (as well as other employee-driven employment decisions, such as turnover). We want applicants to feel like they are a fit with our firm, but we also want them to have realistic perceptions of fit, which we will talk about as related to realistic job previews or RJPs.

31
Q

Recruitment at Microsoft vs. at Google

A

Microsoft: Solve problems; think critically; make things that matter – hard problems, deeply think

Google: Different structure – avoid bureaucracy, autonomy. Work on what they think is important. Employee-driven. People – high on people orientation. Yoga, pilates, food. FUN!

32
Q

Personnel policies:

A

The employment policies – or personnel policies – of a firm will affect applicants’ perceptions of the extent to which a particular vacancy is attractive and the extent to which that vacancy is a good fit for them.
The particular types of employment policies we are referring to are the following:
-internal vs. external recruiting
-extrinsic vs. intrinsic rewards
-employment-at-will policies
-image advertising

Firms vary in the extent to which they emphasize internal vs. external recruiting in general and for different types of jobs ad job families. We know that lifetime employment, which was characteristic of firms in general in the middle part of the last century, is over- but many firms try to develop internal job ladders so that individuals in lower-level positions can be promoted into higher level positions, which requires some level of internal recruiting. Other firms have a philosophy that it is better in general or for specific types of positions, such as managerial or executive positions, to recruit from outside, so as to get new blood so to speak– fresh ideas and perspectives. The point here is that depending on the preferences of the individual, a firm that focuses on internal – or external – recruiting may be more or less attractive. Firms vary widely in the extent to which they emphasize compensation as part of their total rewards package versus more intrinsic rewards, such as challenging work, job rotations, learning, training and development opportunities– and some firms are more attractive than others to different types of people depending on the type of rewards that are offered and emphasized. Given that we are generally an employment-at-will society, some firms take initiative to offer promises of due process, meaning that employees won’t be terminated without a formal hearing and a series of steps that are used to determine fault. Finally, firms try to send signals to the labor market about the type of work culture – and the type of worker – that is valued by a particular firm, in part through image advertising. Research shows that potential applicants pick up on these signals, and that they choose to apply to and accept offers from firms based on their perceptions about the personnel policies and culture of firms.

33
Q

Recruitment Sources

A

There are a variety of recruitment sources – or methods that can be used to recruit. The source(s) should be chosen based on the goals of recruiting, the type of positions available, as well as other considerations such as image, cost, and so on. So, for instance, college recruitment is often most useful for entry-level recruiting. Also, different sources and methods have different costs. Referrals are generally free, and they can be highly useful. Advertising is generally more expensive, and typically doesn’t result in a large proportion of qualified applicants. Let’s discuss some of the major recruitment sources in turn. Note: a source is where the talent comes from; a method is the tools and processes used to get access to talent from a particular source. The terms are often used interchangeably.

34
Q

Internal recruitment

A

Internal recruitment means sourcing labor for positions from the labor pool already existing in a firm. Applicants might want a lateral move – perhaps to try something new or to develop new skills – or a vertical move for a promotion to a more challenging, responsible opportunity. In this sense, internal recruitment gives more opportunities to employees, can offer a sense of career progression, and can create an image of a more paternalistic type of firm, which can be both good and bad. In terms of recruitment methods, there are several: this can include word of mouth and job postings, but recruiters and mangers might also look to other sources of information, such as an employee inventory or to previous performance appraisals. An employee inventory is a searchable database with detailed information about employees- their KSAOs, so that a recruiter can try to find persons who might be qualified for a particular position. Of course, previous performance appraisal information will also be a potentially good source of information about employee’s KSAOs and, when done effectively, about their interests and goals as well. This information can be cataloged in an employee inventory database – but this is usually the case in larger, more sophisticated firms. In general, most firms use a company intranet to post information about new jobs. Some firms have a policy that internal candidates should be recruited and considered (i.e., interviewed) first, before external candidates are considered. This is more common among public firms, unionized firms or government contractors or other similar types of firms. There are pros and cons with internal recruiting, such as:

Pros:

  • Most cost-effective
  • Existing employees are already familiar with company
  • Employees are usually motivated by opportunities for advancement
  • Managers have access to applicants’ past performance information

Cons:

  • Sometimes companies want new ideas
  • There is a need for diversity among most firms, perhaps especially knowledge-based firms, and external recruiting may sometimes be more useful in this connection
35
Q

External recruitment

A

There are a variety of external recruitment sources and methods, and the method used should be tailored to the goals of recruiting as well as the positions that are being recruited for. Of course, different labor markets represent workers with different skills sets, and it is important to try to identify the most appropriate labor markets and the most effective ways to recruit in those labor markets.

36
Q

Direct Applications & Referrals

A

Direct applicants are people who apply for a position without being identified and recruited by a firm. Google, for instance, has many thousands of direct applicants across several weeks at at time. You probably have applied for a position before – or have posted your resume to a firm’s careers website – without being prompted to do so. Think about what types of firms you would apply directly to without a prompt. Most likely, this is an employer of choice and/or one that engages in image advertising. Individuals self-select into firms based on their assessment of person-environment fit, and oftentimes applicants will do their research about the type of environments that different firms have to offer. Word-of-mouth is also an important way to find information about a potential employer– from friends, family members, and so on. Word-of-mouth can sometimes translate into a referral, which occurs when a person is prompted by someone within a firm – such as a friend – to apply. These informal sources of external recruiting are increasingly important as a recruiting source because referrals can be great sources of qualified candidates. After all, prompting is done by someone within the firm, so the applicant is likely to know something about the firm, its business and its culture, and the applicant is thus more likely to have a realistic sense of what it might be like to work at that firm. As your book describes, Sprint saw their proportion of new hires grow from 8% to 34% recently, which is indicative of the importance of referrals.

37
Q

Advertising

A

Of course, most firms can not rely on direct applicants and referrals alone. Other methods of external recruiting are also usually necessary. When it comes to external recruiting, perhaps one of the most popular, or at least widely well-known is advertising, which today can be done through a variety of media including newspapers, bulletin boards and the Internet. Firms may also choose to post advertisements on various bulletin boards, such as those at colleges and universities, or on the Internet– on a job search database or on their own company website. Company webpages are useful for a variety of reasons, such as they allow a firm to tailor their recruitment message. Moreover, the website can ask potential applicants to fill out information banks, which can be useful for recordkeeping and even for selection purposes. As your book suggests, the fact that company websites can help firms determine the extent to which a particular individual might actually be a good fit for a position is a key advantage of company websites. This is somewhat dependent upon company websites being “visible” so to speak; company websites are not as useful for lesser-know firms, and some firms therefore pay websites such as LinkedIn to use pop-up ads that link to the company website. Recruiting via the Internet has increased in general, as has the increased use of social media, such as Facebook. Firms can purchase sponsored pages, which provide information to potential applicants, as well as informal information sources like blogs. These sorts of sites also provide an opportunity for potential applicants to interact with recruiters virtually, which will probably be increasingly common and of interest to certain types of applicants, such as those who are technology-savvy.

38
Q

College Recruiting

A

Colleges and universities are an obvious source for talent, and recruiters will often attend information sessions, career fairs and so on. As with other sources, the utility of campus recruiting depends on the type of talent a firm is looking for, and college recruiting is generally most useful for recruiting to entry-level positions. Firms are quite selection usually in the campuses they choose to attend, as sending recruiters to campuses can be expensive. That said, campuses can be valuable sources of talent, and firms sometimes compete fiercely at some of the more elite schools. As an aside, the utility of campus recruiting for certain types of positions, such as entry-level finance positions on wall-street, can ebb and flow depending on how different firms or industries are viewed at different times. For instance, there was a story in 2014 on NPR’s marketplace about how recruiters were finding it difficult to attract the best and brightest talent to wall-street firms after the financial collapse that preceded the great recession because smart, savvy college grads were disillusioned with the finance industry in general. To enhance a firm’s chances of attracting the best and brightest, many firms offer internship programs for professional positions- and this is also very common for master’s-level HR programs and, similarly, MBA programs. Internships are not only a recruitment tool, they are a sort of realistic job preview (which we will discuss more later). They allow both the potential candidate and the firm to determine fit and the extent to which an individual will be a good performer in a certain role.

Colleges and universities may be an important source for entry level professionals. To increase effectiveness, organizations employ internship programs to get early access to potential applicants and to assess their capabilities directly.

39
Q

Employment Agencies & Search Firms

A

Sometimes firms need help from employment agencies and even search firms. Employment agencies can be both public or private. Social Security legislation requires that workers receiving unemployment be registered with a local unemployment office, and this can be a good source of potential talent for firms. Public employment agencies offer their services for free, and they also provide a variety of services that are useful for firms, such as testing and training. Of course, private search firms also offer similar services – but at a price. Private search firms are usually more relevant for jobs that are more difficult to recruit for or for positions that are more competitive. This is often the case with high-level managerial and executive jobs. Firms will employ search firms – or headhunters – to help them identify qualified candidates when it would otherwise be difficult to do so. These firms will often specialize in a specific type of talent in specific types of positions or industries.

40
Q

Other Recruitment Sources

A

There are other sources that can be considered, such as professional associations and temporary employees. Firms are increasingly looking to temporary workers and temp-to-hire workers as a way to find – and to assess – new workers. Although temp-to-hire positions may not be as common as temporary or otherwise contingent work arrangements, this is an important source for firms to consider, and I would suggest that as an HR professional or manager that you not forget about the KSAs of your temporary workers when you are working on recruitment. Professional associations, such as the American Medial Association, represent the interests of their professional members, and they very often will have job boards or avenues by which firms can be in touch with their members. For specialized or rare types of labor, professional associations may be particularly useful.

41
Q

Pros & Cons of External Recruitment

A

There are always tradeoffs in life, and this is the case when it comes to internal vs. external recruiting. In general, external recruiting is more expensive than internal recruiting. Another disadvantage is that incumbents may be upset when a firm chooses to emphasize external recruiting – especially when this is related to a lack of opportunities for growth within a firm. This can cause problems associated with turnover, job withdrawal and so on. External recruitment, when done effectively, can help a firm identify talent that may not be present within a firm, and it can also help bring in candidates with new, potentially innovative ideas. Rarely do firms try to exclusively emphasize internal recruitment today, and many times recruiters and hiring managers will consider both internal and external candidates for the same position.

42
Q

Evaluating Recruitment Methods

A

In general, most firms do not evaluate the pros and cons of different recruitment methods in a particularly sophisticated way. This is, in part, because there aren’t hard and fast rules about the utility of different methods. As you will see when it comes to selection, there are more objective and perhaps obvious ways to evaluate the utility of selection methods. One way to evaluate recruitment methods is cost per hire. This ignores other data, of course, such as the quality of candidates, but it is an objective and important indicator. Although the purpose of selection is to predict the extent to which different candidates will perform well on the job, keeping track of the extent to which different recruitment methods result in relatively longer tenure (or lower turnover) and higher job performance is certainly reasonable and feasible. Of course, this takes some extra work and requires connecting recruitment data with other data and, therefore, perhaps a sophisticated HR metrics system. Yield ratios, which are the proportion of applicants who successfully move from earlier to later stages of recruitment, are also useful.

43
Q

Recruiters

A

Recruiters are important because, as above, they can affect the types of persons who end up applying to a position (applicant characteristics), as well as how potential applicants perceive a given position (vacancy characteristics). Therefore, recruiters are incredibly important – and they obviously serve an important function. That said, the level of this effect isn’t typically very strong. That is, recruiters don’t generally have a large impact on job choice. Still, the job of a recruiter is to provide a connection between potential applicants and the firm. They are a representative of the firm, and they will be evaluated as such by potential applicants. Research shows that applicants approach recruiters with some level of skepticism, because they know that the role of a recruiter is to “sell” the job and the firm, which is to say they provide generally positive information about potential vacancies and about the employer firm. Recruiters should therefore be carefully trained, they should be aware of EEO laws and other employment legislation, and they should be very knowledgeable about a firm’s value proposition. Research also shows that:

  1. The recruiter is likely to be perceived as more credible if he or she is from the same functional area the recruit is being considered for.
  2. Critical traits appear to be warmth and “informativeness.”
  3. The Recruiter’s Realism—Deceiving candidates about the negative elements of a job may increase later turnover; however, telling candidates about negative elements does not appear to inoculate them against disappointment or make negative elements go away. Personnel policies that affect the job’s attributes are likely to be more critical than recruiter realism.
44
Q

Steps to enhance recruiter impact

A

Recruiters can provide timely feedback about the status of the job search, avoid unfavorable behaviors that send poor messages about the organization, focus on inexperienced applicants with whom they might be more influential, and avoid mixing recruitment with selection. Recruiting should include job imcumbents and line managers, not just HR professionals, and should be done in teams because HR professionals tend to have the knowledge and skills to help make the recruitment process maximally effective.

45
Q

Realistic Job Preview

A

Given that the purpose of recruitment is, in general, to try to find persons with competencies that are a fit with an organization and to get them to become interested in said organization, organizations and recruiters may unintentionally mislead candidates. This is especially likely perhaps when employers are trying to recruit in tight labor markets. A legal issue with this sort of scenario is that we have truth in hiring laws, and employees may seek recourse against a former employer if they become disgruntled and feel that they were mislead. A less litigious but no less important problem with recruiting is that because usually mostly positive information is provided, individuals can form inaccurate perceptions of person-organization fit. Thus, once on the job, they may perform lower than expected due to problems with fit, which is unfair to the employee and also damaging to the organization. Thus, it is important that steps are taken to provide a more realistic sense of what a job – and working for a particular employer more generally – will be like. One way to do so is to craft balanced recruitment messages, which include both positive and less positive information – honest information – about the job and the work environment, or what might be perceived as the key pros and perhaps the cons of the potential employment. For instance, a fast-paced, competitive and challenging work environment may be desirable to some candidates, but not to others. It is important to communicate this sort of information to candidates so that candidates who are a fit can self-select to say in the recruitment process, and those who are not can self-select out. Another option is to provide a realistic job preview to highly qualified, interested applicants, which is meant to provide balanced, candid information about a potential employment opportunity. An internship is a sort of realistic job preview, but a less formal – and less lengthy – one could be allowing or even encouraging an applicant to shadow a job incumbent for a day or for part of a day to get a better sense of what a job is like. Another form could be video testimonials that provide balanced information.