HOW MUCH GOES TO Flashcards
LEARN TO SOLVE HOW MUCH EACH WILL GET
A instituted B and C as his
heirs. Without designating their specific shares
B and C shall inherit
equally, that is 50-50.
: Estate is 100,000. A is a
compulsory heir. He was instituted together
with B and C.
A will first get the 50,000 as
his legitime. The remaining 50,000 will be divided to the three of them as instituted
heirs.
Estate is 120,000. A B C
were instituted with 30,000 each.
The total is 90,000. The remaining
30,000 will be distributed to the three. So, they will get 40,000 each
Estate is 90,000, A B C and
were instituted with 40,000 each
reduce 10,000 each.
I hereby institute as my only heirs A,
B, and C each one to get ¼ of my
estate.
The ¼ still undistributed
should clearly be divided
proportionately equally among A,B,&
C since this is the evident intention of
the testator.
T instituted A (his son), B and C, to
an estate of P300,000.00.
A gets as
legitime ½ of the estate or
P150,000.00. The remaining
P150,000.00 will be divided equally among A, B, & C. Thus, A gets
P200,000.00 – P150,000.00 as legitime, P50,000.00 as instituted heir.
I institute as my heirs A, B, and the
three children of C to my estate of
P100,000.00
. In this case the three
children of C will get P20,000.00
each.
T instituted A and A’s two children to
an estate of P30,000.00.
Each of the
three heirs gets P10,000.00 ALL at the same time.
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION: A instituted B as heir provided that B
passes the bar examination for 2022.
institution of an heir with a
condition
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION
A instituted B as heir, which will take
effect on January 2022.
institution of an heir with a
term
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION: A gave P300,000.00 so that the same may be spent for the interment of C, the late husband of A.
Example of modal institution
A instituted B as an heir on
the condition that B would learn how
to drive the car.
This must be fulfilled
as soon as possible after A’s death. If B already knows how to drive, it is
understood that he inherits the same.
A gives B a legacy on
condition that C wins the lotto draw.
The fulfillment may be either before or after A’s death. If C had already won the lotto and A DID NOT KNOW
this, the condition is deemed already complied with, and B gets the legacy.
However, if A KNEW ABOUT IT (C’s lotto winning), the condition is deemed fulfilled only if C wins again.
A gives B a legacy on
condition that B becomes a lawyer.
The condition may be fulfilled either before or after the death of A. If B is already a lawyer and A DID NOT KNOW this, the condition is deemed complied with and B gets the legacy. If A KNEW THIS, B gets the legacy just the same, because the condition is of such nature that it can no longer be complied with again.
A institutes B as heir on
condition that B should not smoke
for one year.
He gets the inheritance
right away but he must first give a security to guarantee he would not smoke for a period of one year. In
case he does smoke again within said period he should return whatever he
may have received, together with its
fruits and interest.
Estate is $500M. A B and C are
siblings. A got $50M as donation. Is there a
preterition?
NO, because A was not totally omitted because he received a donation. A
can DEMAND the remaining value of his legitime. The donation is an ADVANCE of
his inheritance which is deductible from his legitime.
If the estate is P180,000, A is
instituted to P120,000; B to P20,000;
and C to P40,000. Since B and C are
made substitutes of A, WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
if substitution is proper, B and C will get A’s P120,000 in the proportion of P20,000 is to P40,000 (or in the
proportion of 1 is to 2). Hence, in the substitution, B gets P40,000 and C
gets P80,000.