HOW FAR DID INDIVIDUALS DEVELOP, AND ALSO CHALLENGE, THE PREVAILING ORTHODOXY CONCERNING POVERTY AND POOR RELIEF? Flashcards

1
Q

What was the prevailing orthodoxy throughout most of the 19th century?

A
  • poverty was necessary, and even desirable, if people were to strive and improve their lot.
  • indigence (the inability of individuals to provide for themselves and their families even at the most basic level) was the fault of the poor themselves.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was Samuel Smiles?

A

• author and political reformer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

After studying medicine, where did Smiles move to in 1838 to begin his career in journalism? What newspaper did he become editor of?

A

• Leeds- the Leeds Times.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Smiles use his post as editor of the Leeds Times to campaign for?

A

• reform of parliament, women’s suffrage, free trade and factory reform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What movements was Smiles a strong supporter of?

A
  • the cooperative movement in Leeds- particularly of Leeds Mutual Society and Leeds Redemption Society.
  • 1840- became secretary of the Leeds Parliamentary Reform Association- supporting the Chartist movement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why did Smiles stop supporting the Chartist movement?

A

• was alarmed by the growing militarism of some of the Chartist leaders- eg: Feargus O’Connor from the Northern star who used physical force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why did Smiles turn to writing?

A

• he was disappointed with the lack of progress towards parliamentary reform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Smiles begin to believe about how to lift the poor out of poverty and give them a voice?

A

• parliamentary reform its self wouldn’t be enough- thought individual reform was needled and people needed to change their own attitudes and practices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Smiles’ first book and what was it about?

A
  • Self-Help (published in 1859).
  • said self-help provided the best route to success, saying it was possible for all to accumulate wealth for people to raise themselves out of poverty, so vast amounts of poor rates were not necessary. Only the genuinely destitute required help.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who did Smiles write biographies for due to his belief in people being able to improve their lot?

A

• George Stephenson and Josiah Wedgwood- who had achieved their success through hard work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Smiles book Thrift published in 1875 argue?

A

• the correct use of money was the basis of self help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In 1980, what book of Smiles’ got published? What did it contain?

A
  • Duty.
  • full of examples of great deeds done by men and women who he thought should be shining examples to the rest of the population.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Smiles effect the prevailing orthodoxy?

A

• he supported it, but developed it too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who was Henry Mayhew?

A

• investigative journalist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In 1849, what did Mayhew write a series of articles on? What was the name of the book that they went onto be published in?

A
  • wrote articles for the Morning Chronicle about the lives of the poor in London.
  • book- London Labour and the London Poor.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why was Mayhew’s work in the London Labourer and the London Poor so influential and popular?

A
  • findings primarily concerned with London- but he paced them in a wider national context too.
  • he visited the homes and workplaces of the poor so became very in touch with how they lived and felt.
17
Q

What did Mayhew discover about the poor in London?

A

• revealed the extent to which London’s economy depended on casual and unskilled labour.

18
Q

What groups did Mayhew end up classifying the poor into?

A
  • those who will work.
  • those who cannot work.
  • those who will not work.
19
Q

How did Mayhew describe his class of pauper of those who will work?

A
  • able-boddied poor who did a wide range of jobs.
  • skilled artisans- elite of the group, eg: cabinet makers, jewellers, engineers. Manual workers but had skills they could sell.
  • craftsmen- next group down, eg: bricklayers, weavers, ironworkers. When demand was there they could get a decent wage.
  • labourers- largest group, eg: sweeping, lifting, scrubbing. Casual work only really available when the times were good.
20
Q

How did Mayhew describe his class of pauper of those who cannot work?

A
  • some able-bodied poor couldn’t work because there was no work for them to do.
  • eg- bad weather meant house painters and bricklayers couldn’t work, failed US cotton crop meant mill workers were laid off.
  • no redundancy money/ unemployment benefits meant paupers were forced to bed or seek help from charities or guardians.
  • labouring work was dangerous- broken bones and disease followed meaning labourers could no longer work.
  • elderly- not the strength or health to work, and with no pensions, the childless elderly faced a desperate old age.
21
Q

How did Mayhew describe his class of pauper of those who will not work?

A
  • beggars abs vagrants (normally boys) were common.

* calculated between 40,000 and 100,000 destitute men and boys were tramping the roads and begging where they could.

22
Q

Who was Charles Dickens?

A

• novelist and social critic.

23
Q

What were the 2 points that Dickens constantly emphasised throughout his work?

A
  • the poor wee people, with hopes and desires like everyone else.
  • the workhouse system was a mindless, cruel institution that dehumanised both its clients and carers.
24
Q

Why was Dickens’ childhood so significant for his writing? What happened to him?

A
  • he had experienced poverty first hand.
  • family plunged into poverty when his father went to prison for debt.
  • 12 years old- Dickens taken out of school and sent to work in a blacking factory (where polish was made).
  • 3 years later- Dickens able to return to school after his father payed off his debt- but his experiences never left him.
25
Q

What books did Dickens’ childhood provide the background for?

A
  • David Copperfield (1849-50).

* Great Expectations (1861).

26
Q

How did Dickens publish his books? Why was this successful?

A
  • published them in short weekly/ monthly instalments.
  • the quality of his writing guaranteed success.
  • he could gauge his readers reactions and modify the plots accordingly to ensure popularity.
  • left instalments on cliff hangers to hold the readers attention and leave them eager for the next instalment.
27
Q

Who was Dickens’ audience?

A
  • popular with the middle classes.

* evidence that the illiterate poor gathered to have episodes read to them too.

28
Q

What was Dickens’ most famous novel and what did it criticise?

A

• Oliver Twist (1837-38)- critical of the workhouse system.

29
Q

What did his novel Bleak House (1852) provide an insight into?

A

• the plight of the poor- describing how the poor feel excluded from normal human life and contact.

30
Q

What did Dickens’ novel Little Dorrit (1855-57) tell the story of?

A

• a father imprisoned for debt so complex that no one could figure out how he could be released.

31
Q

What did Dickens’ novel Our Mutual Friend (1864-65) react to?

A

• the workhouse system.

32
Q

Which other authors drew attention to the poor in a similar way to Dickens?

A

• Elizabeth Gaskell and Benjamin Disraeli- focused on poverty and the problems faced by those living close to the edge.

34
Q

How did Dickens’ work create pressure for change?

A
  • gave a voice to the poor in a manner that captured the interest and concern of the middle class.
  • this pressure for change was subtle, but it’s impact was widespread.