How Does Plato's Form Of The Good Compare With Aristotle's Prime Mover?

Question 1

Plato’s understanding of the Form of the Good gives Christians the concept of God as a perfect source of ?, with an ultimate reality and existence which is permanent and ?

Answer 1

Goodness.

Unchanging.

Question 2

Aristotle’s understanding of the Prime Mover gives Christianity an understanding of God who is the ? cause of all that exists but is himself not caused by anything else.

Answer 2

Ultimate.

Question 3

Both the Form of the Good and the Primer Mover, like the God of Christianity, have an independent, “necessary ?”; they depend on nothing else for their own existence.

Answer 3

Existence.

Question 4

Also, unlike the God of Christianity, neither the Form of the Good or the Prime Mover take an interest in ? affairs of ?

Answer 4

Moral.

Humanity.

Question 5

The For, of the Good is not a “?” with a mind; it has no intentions or emotions.

Answer 5

Being.

Question 6

The Prime Mover draws things to itself by ? making them move and change.

Answer 6

Attraction.

Question 7

The Prime Mover thinks of itself and it’s own perfect ? whereas the Form of the Good doesn’t have a ? with which to think.

Answer 7

Nature.

Mind.

Question 8

The Form of the Good is solely ? whereas the Prime Mover is more to do with motion, cause and change rather than ?

Answer 8

Goodness.

Morality.

Question 9

The Form of the Good is something which, possibly, humans might be able to encounter once they’ve left this life, but there’s no suggestion that humans could ever gain further ? of the Primer Mover after death.

Answer 9

Knowledge.