How do you diagnose infectious disease? Flashcards
What are the 5 phases of clinical reasoning? and the 2 steps?
Step 1: Making a Diagnosis
- History and physical examination
- Diagnostic tests
Microbiologic (this course)
Others - Integration of clinical findings with test results
Step 2: Taking Appropriate Action
- Weigh risks & benefits of alternatives
- Consider patient preferences, develop treatment plan
What do you need to know generally about patient history in suspected infection?
General:
Details about illness
- Symptoms
- Duration
Medications
- For chronic conditions
- For this illness
Allergies (especially antibiotics)
Family history
What do you need to know specifically about patient history in suspected infection?
Specific - Fever TMAX and pattern, night sweats, rigors - Infectious contacts - Foreign travel Immunizations, prophylaxis, illness during/after - Occupation - Animal contacts - Dietary history
What are the non-micro investigations?
- Blood tests
Blood counts
Liver enzymes
Coagulation studies
- Imaging Plain x-rays Ultrasound (including echocardiography) CT, MRI Nuclear medicine studies
How do you come about the clinical diagnosis of infection? (3 things)
history + physical exam + diagnostic tests (blood, micro, imaging) = diagnosis
What are the 4 (with one additional sub one) types of microorganisms?
bacteria - mycobacteria parasites fungi viruses
What are current methods of detection for microorganisms?
Culture methods
Bacteria
- Mycobacteria
Fungi
- Yeasts
- Moulds = filamentous fungi
(Viruses)
Non-culture methods
Parasites
- Protozoa
- Helminths
Viruses
(Bacteria)
- (Mycobacteria)
(Fungi)
You need to have cells that viruses can take over to perpetuate for virus culture and that is difficult.
What are tools for micro. lab diagnosis?
Microscopy
Culture
Serodiagnosis
- Antibody detection
- Antigen detection
Molecular methods
- Amplification = PCR, others
- Nucleic acid probes
For lab diagnosis of bacterial infections, how is this done for gram stain + microscopy?
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections
Methods vary depending on specimen type / suspected bacteria
- Gram stain + microscopy
- Fast turnaround, but not very sensitive (need lots of bacteria)
- Good for specimens that should be sterile in healthy people
- not very useful if lots of normal flora present
- only tells you that bacteria are present – doesn’t ID the species
Fecal material is one where you would expect very large numbers of bacteria. Urine will have very very little numbers and they would be difficult to hear.
For bacterial infections what comments are there on doing a culture?
- Methods requiring growth (culture)
- Place specimen on appropriate culture media to allow growth of any bacteria that may be present
- Additional work-up performed on significant organisms:
- Identify species
- using phenotypic characteristics (metabolic end products, growth properties, production of enzymes, etc.)
- using protein profiles (mass spectroscopy)
- Susceptibility testing (Susceptibility testing – what can they use to kill the bacteria to make the patient better.
)
- Susceptibility testing (Susceptibility testing – what can they use to kill the bacteria to make the patient better.
Slow (usually 24-72 hrs.; but up to weeks for slow-growers ) Only works if bacteria can be grown on laboratory media Contamination with normal flora makes things more difficult Still the most often used diagnostic method in micro labs
What are methods not requiring growth for bacterial infections?
- Methods not requiring growth
Nucleic acid based tests- Detect a DNA sequence unique to the bacteria
(eg. PCR - polymerase chain reaction)
fast, very sensitive, but technically complex & expensive
- Detect a DNA sequence unique to the bacteria
Serological tests (ELISA assays)
- Look for antibodies in blood produced against a bacteria
Does not distinguish between current vs. past infection
- Look for bacterial antigens using prepared antibodies
Note: Non-growth methods require that you know exactly what bacterial species to look for (not a “screening” test)
What are the problems with lab diagnosis of viral infections and what are 3 methods for doing this?
Problems:
Symptoms of some viral diseases mimic other microbial diseases Different types of viruses may produce very similar symptoms Culture methods are difficult because viruses only “grow” inside living cells; increasingly are replaced by molecular assays
Methods:
- Serology - detects antibodies in blood produced against a virus
some assays (often IgM) indicate current or recent infection
others (often IgG) useful as a screen to determine if someone has been exposed in the past
Acute and convalescent: >4-fold IgG rise could indicate recent infx’n - Molecular (PCR) - detects viral RNA / DNA in patient specimens
rapid, highly sensitive and specific
complex, expensive, and not good for large #’s of specimens- Advancing technology may remove these barriers
IgM is the earliest antibody formed, so if this is present that would indicate acute infection. There are some cases where the IgM can stay around for even a year.
IgG can be used to indicate possible reactivation in the future like chicken pox, if you have the IgG for this then it is possible that you could develop shingles.
- (Direct or Indirect) Fluorescent Antibody (DFA or IFA) tests
- Looks for virus-infected cells in a patientDFA: Collect patient specimen likely to contain infected cells Add antibodies (tagged with a fluorescent dye) that recognize viral surface components, then wash Examine microscopically for binding of fluorescent Ab to cell Fast, but not very sensitive (need lots of infected cells) - Requires skilled microscopist
What are approaches to lab diagnosis of fungal infections?
- Direct microscopic examination
Examine tissue or other specimen and detect the presence of fungal elements = usually yeasts or hyphae- Culture (moulds) Culture media and temperature that support optimal growth, macroscopic and microscopic appearance - Biochemical identification (yeasts) Similar to bacteria - Non-culture methods (yeasts and moulds) PCR-sequencing, serology (dimorphics), antigen detection (histo, crypto), mass spectroscopy
What are some laboratory diagnosis of parasitic infections?
Almost exclusively by microscopic examination
- requires appropriate specimen likely to contain parasite - requires knowledge of parasite morphology - time consuming and technically demanding Stool EIA available for detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium species from stool Serologic assays available to detect exposure to certain parasites
What kind of turnaround can you expect for different tests?
What kind of turn-around time can you reasonably expect?
Gram stain - 1 to 2 hrs Bacterial culture with - 24 to 48 hrs - susceptibility 48 to 72h Mycobacterial culture with susceptibility - 2 to 8 weeks Viral serology or DFA - 4 to 24 hrs Mycology (fungi) - 24 hrs to 6 weeks Parasites - 24 hrs to 1 week Any molecular (PCR) test - 4 to 24 hrs Factors beyond the lab’s control - Transportation delays - Correct specimen?; Properly labeled, etc.? - If you want it “STAT”, does the requisition say so? - BUT if everything is STAT, then nothing is STAT! Collect the right specimen at the right time in the right way