Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Homicide > Flashcards

Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Types of Homicide in Descending Order of Punishment

A 
1st Degree Murder 
2nd Degree Murder
Voluntary Manslaughter
Involuntary Manslaughter
Negligent Homicide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1st Degree Murder

A

Premeditation + Deliberation + Intent (to kill or cause great bodily harm) + Malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1st Degree Felony Murder

A 
Felony murder (strict liability) 
●	Predicate felonies in the statute the legislature enumerated (usually robbery, rape, burglary, kidnapping)
●	Prove actus reus and mens rea for predicate felonies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2nd Degree Murder

A

Intent (to kill or cause great bodily harm) + Malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2nd Degree Depraved Indifference Murder

A

Depraved Indifference Murder (reckless, gross-negligence)
● Under circumstances evincing depraved indifference to life, recklessly engages in conduct that is imminently dangerous and creates a grave risk of death

Step 1: Establish reckless mens rea
Step 2: Objective assessment of whether conduct is imminently dangerous and poses grave risk of death

See People v. Roe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2nd Degree Felony Murder

A

Residual judge-made category

Predicate felonies not outlined under 1st degree murder that are inherently dangerous to human life and don’t merge with the murder itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter

A

recklessnessly, maybe negligently, cause death of another (also no malice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter

A

reckless disregard of a substantial risk of death in the circumstances (also no malice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Negligent Homicide

A

Simple negligence (based on tort negligence) that leads to death of another

Pretty much the same under MPC and common law (see Robertson)

Many states require culpable negligence (almost like recklessness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Premeditation and Deliberation Formula

A

P&D separates 1st and 2nd degree murder

Premeditation: design to kill, knowing what steps are to kill someone

Deliberation: period of time for cool reflection - requires some period of reflection during which the mind is free from the influence of excitement/passion

Premeditation and deliberation cannot both be formed in an instant

Multiple blows theory: Some courts treat it as evidence for deliberation, because the repeated blows (or shots) means you have time to reflect. State v Brown does not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State v. Brown

A
  1. Charged D (father) with first-degree murder, son soiled himself late at night, he went blank and beat him, child killed, had repeated blows to head and other parts of body
  2. Elements of 1st degree murder in state of Tennessee
    • Intent – willfully, of purpose, with intent
    • Malice – malice aforethought
    • Deliberately – cool purpose, with coolness and reflection, requires some period of reflection during which the mind is free from the influence of excitement/passion
    • Premeditation – design to kill
  3. What separates 1st degree from 2nd is the premeditation/deliberation
  4. Brown rejects previous case law including:
    • There are cases where multiple blows is circumstantial evidence of premeditation
    • Premeditation and deliberation can be formed at that moment in an instant
    • Treat premeditation and deliberation as the same thing
  5. No proof D acted with premeditation and deliberation, guilty of second degree murder
  6. *After Brown, TN got rid of deliberation requirement and added aggravated child abuse to list of predicate felonies in first degree murder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Catapulting element from manslaughter to 2nd degree depraved indifference murder

A

Reckless engaging in conduct that is imminently dangerous and poses a grave risk of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

People v. Roe

A
  1. 3 boys at D’s house (15 yo), he’s interested in guns, showed them father’s shotgun, loaded a mix of live and dummy shells, pointed it at victim and asked who wanted to play Polish roulette, pulled trigger, killed other boy. 3rd boy witnessed.
  2. Recklessness charge can get catapulted from manslaughter to murder when conduct is imminently dangerous and creates a grave risk of death
  3. Jury first has subjective inquiry to find that he was reckless (consciously aware of risk of death). Then goes into objective assessment – look at conduct and ask if it is imminently dangerous and poses a grave risk of death
  4. Roulette does create an imminent risk of danger and grave risk of death
  5. Dissent: Concerned that majority is eviscerating difference b/w involuntary manslaughter and second degree depraved heart murder. Wants to look at depravity of the mind, must manifest level of callousness and extreme cruelty as to be equal in blameworthiness to intentional murder. Kid was clearly violently upset and regretful about what he’d done.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MPC Murder

A

FIRST DEGREE FELONY

It is murder if a homicide is committed purposefully or knowingly

OR

recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life

FELONY MURDER SECTION
That recklessness is presumed if actor engaged in (or was accomplice to) commission or attempt to commit, or flight after committing or attempting to commit + [list of predicate felonies]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MPC Manslaughter

A

SECOND DEGREE FELONY

Manslaughter if homicide committed recklessly

OR

What would otherwise be murder, but committed under influence of extreme emotional disturbance for which there is reasonable explanation or excuse

Reasonableness to be determined from viewpoint of person in actor’s situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be (totally subjective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Provocation doctrine (common law)

A
  1. Highly provoking event
  2. Legally adequate
    • 1. Angry words followed by assault
    • 2. Words that describe a highly provoking event (person tells you about someone beating your child)
    • 3. The sight of a citizen being unlawfully deprive of his liberty
    • 4. The sight of a man in adultery with the accused’s wife
    • Legally insufficient: words alone, affronting gestures, trespass to property, misconduct by a child or servant, breach of contract
  3. Defendant is in fact enraged
  4. Reasonable person would be too (reasonable person doesn’t kill, but would be tempted)
  5. Defendant kills before expiration (no cooling off period)
  6. *Purposeful murder can get downgraded because of provocation
17
Q

Freddo v. State (words alone are not adequate)

A
  1. Freddo and deceased were coworkers, deceased use phrased son of a bitch, which Freddo didn’t like b/c he’s orphaned, asked him to stop using but he didn’t, after someone spilled oil on deceased’s tool box he called Freddo a son of a bitch, Freddo grabbed steel bar and struck him, killed
  2. Not sufficient to show he killed under impulse of sudden passion
  3. Not legally adequate – words alone are not legally adequate provocation
  4. Not reasonable – court used objective standard of reasonableness
    • Freddo is peculiar – “morally well trained” because he respects women
18
Q

State v. Gougnagias (cooling period)

A
  1. D got very drunk, deceased insulted D and then sodomized him while he was helpless, deceased told a lot of people about it over several weeks who made fun him, one day he went home to grab gun and killed deceased while he was sleeping
  2. Didn’t allow evidence of provocation because it was a period of time, sudden anger cannot be cumulative, must be sudden anger and resentment, but evidence showed brooding and thought resulting in a design to kill
19
Q

People v. Berry (no cooling period, words)

A
  1. D killed wife after a 10 day period where she told him she had an affair and loved another man, strangled her with telephone cord
  2. Court said there was enough evidence to show he killed in a state of uncontrollable rage caused by provocation, verbal provocation enough in cases of infidelity and taunting, long course of provocatory conduct reached final culmination (no cooling off period)
20
Q

Bedder v. Director of Public Prosecutions (objective standard)

A
  1. Sexually impotent man approached prostitute, tried to have sex with her and couldn’t, she jeered at him, he stabbed her
  2. Objective standard – reasonable person, not sexually impotent man
  3. Reasonable person would not have been provoked, conviction for murder affirmed
21
Q

MPC Extreme Emotional Disturbance

A

Allows murder to be downgraded to a manslaughter

  1. Committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance
  2. EED be based on reasonable explanation or excuse
    • Determined from viewpoint of person in the actor’s situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be
  3. *Idiosyncratic moral values are not take into account
  4. *Anything highly provoking can count as long as it invokes in the person extreme emotional distress that has a reasonable explanation/excuse
    • *Slow-boiling can go to jury, words can go to jury
  5. Mistake: Don’t have to be right, just have to be reasonable
  6. Burden of persuasion is on defendant
22
Q

US v. Robertson

A

Kid losing weight and dying case

Covers involuntary manslaughter and negligent homicide

23
Q

Felony Murder Justifications

A
  1. Retributive
    i. Someone who goes out to commit a felony and then kills someone deserves a higher level of punishment
    ii. They don’t deserve the tailored approach we take to homicide
  2. Benefits to criminal justice system
  3. Deterrence
    i. Adds extra penalty for underlying felony
    ii. Argument against: we already have a penalty for the underlying felony, so if the goal is to enhance deterrence for it, then ratchet up the punishment for the underlying felony or prosecute it more
    iii. So it is to deter criminals from committing their felonies dangerously?—“be careful in committing your crime” –> stupid
24
Q

Second Degree Felony Murder Steps

A
  1. Is the felony inherently dangerous to human life?
    • Abstract approach: look at the elements of the abstract crime (not considering facts of the particular case) and you can tell that it’s inherently dangerous and ask if there is a high probability of causing death (used in Hansen)
    • Contextual approach: facts and circumstances should be considered in deciding which felonies qualify for felony murder
  2. Is it independent of the homicide? (Merger Rule)
    • Felony must be of collateral and independent felonious design
    • If purpose is to inflict harm or death, then it is not independent, e.g. assaults are not independent
    • Otherwise any type of lower-level homicide would automatically qualify one for second degree FM
  3. Causation!
25
Q

Hansen

A
  1. Felony – discharging a weapon at an inhabited building
  2. Inherently dangerous to human life?
    • Court could look to if it is inherently dangerous in the abstract, or inherently dangerous in the context as it was carried out
    • Court chooses abstract – look at statutory definition – decide it is inherently dangerous in the abstract
  3. Is it independent of the homicide? (If not it merges into the homicide)
    • Look to if the act causing death was committed with a collateral and independent felonious design separate from intent to inflict the injury that caused death
    • Decided here it was, shot at house to leave calling card = independent felonious purpose, not doing it to commit assault/murder, doing it to send a message

Criminal Law (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions