Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Types of Murder

A

first Degree

Second Degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

types of Manslaughter

A

Voluntary Manslaughter
Involuntary Manslaughter
Vehicular Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Murder

A

1) the unlawful
2) killing
3) of another human being
4) with malice aforethought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Manslaughter

A

1) the unlawful
2) killing
3) of another human being
4) WITHOUT malice aforethought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Human being

A

Born alive, not a fetus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Malice Aforethought

A

1) Intent to kill
2) Intent to do serious bodily harm
3) depraved heart
4) felony murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Malice

A

wickedness of deposition, hardness of heart, wanton conduct, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and/ or a mind without regard to social duty

Express: proof of malicious thoughts or activity

Implied- Implied from gross recklessness or extreme indifference to value of human life

Presumption- often presumed where use of deadly weapon on vital part of victim’s body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Homicide

A

• A person is guilty of criminal homicide if he purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently caused the death of another human being.

Criminal homicide is murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

First Degree Murder

A

need Premeditation and deliberation
-Intentional Killing- specific intent to kill

P & D – actual prior thought and reflection

Time- key element

Majority- no time is too short

Minority- must be meaningful deliberation

Deliberation: the mental process of thinking beforehand, deliberation, reflection, weighing or reasoning for a period of time, however short”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Factors for consideration for deliberation

A
  1. the amount of time involved
  2. what Δ did before the killing (planning)
  3. motive
  4. Δ’s prior relationship with victim
  5. nature of the killing
  6. what Δ did after the killing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CL: Voluntary Manslaughter

A

Killing without malice

mitigated murder
Mitigation usually arises because the defendant was found to have been reasonably provoked and to have acted in the heat of passion, or because the defendant honestly believed he or she needed to kill for protection purposes, but that belief was objectively unreasonable

Provocation Defense of “heat of passion”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MPC Manslaughter

A

Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when:

a. it is committed recklessly; or
b. a homicide which would otherwise be murder is committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance for which there is reasonable explanation or excuse. The reasonableness of such explanation or excuse shall be determined from the viewpoint of a person in the actor’s situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Provocation Defense

A

Murder in the heat of passion. Mitigates murder to manslaughter

Elements
a. Sudden, intense passion resulting from provocation by victim so serious it would create passion in reasonable person.

i. Must be actual (subjective test); and
1. Does D think he was being provoked?

ii. Reasonable (objective test)
1. Is the feeling of provocation reasonable?

b. Cooling-off Period- no defense where reasonable “cooling-off period”

c. Adequate Provocation- CL: limited number of provocative acts;
i. today, almost any act that would provoke a reasonable person

d. Words- CL: words alone not enough to provoke;
i. Today- words can be enough

Wrong Victim- defense applies where killing of someone else in attempt to kill provoker

i. When provocation is offered as a mitigating defense, the burden of proof is upon the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not provoked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Imperfect Defense

A

Traditional protective defense where belief in need to kill honest but unreasonable

a. Not all jurisdictions recognize it
i. Do not have reasonableness std here, more subjective
ii. There still has to be some resemblances of reasonableness though

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Felony Murder

A

An intentional killing where the intent to kill is transferred from the accused’s intent to commit the dangerous felony at issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly