Homicide Flashcards

1
Q

The people v Njovu

A

Extenuating circumstances for murder;
1.that the defendant caused the death
2.by an unlawful act
3. With malice afterthought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name the three kinds of magic

A

Express , implied and constructive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Express malice

A

S204
Intention to cause death or to cause grievous harm
Mbewe v the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implied malice

A

Knowledge that an act or omission can cause death or grievous harm
Mbomena moola v the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Constructive malice

A

Intent to commit a felony that caused death while committing or attempting to commit another felony. Chitengi v the people * arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Punishment for murder

A

Life imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Failed dismissed responsibility

A

-remorse kanyanga v the people
Drunkenness Jose Antonio Golliardi v the people
Witchcraft must fit the threshold of provocation- Kapesh and another v the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Manslaughter

A

Unladylike killing without guilty minds R V LAMB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Voluntary manslaughter

A

Killed under provocation there is diminished responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Provocation

A

If a man kills in the heat of sudden provocation it is manslaughter only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rules for provocation to be valid

A
  1. Provocative act
    2.a reasonably reaction
    3loss of sc
    Simutinta v the people
    ** a reasonable man woul have reacted that way also.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Do not consider the defense of provocation when

A

There is no provocation
Malangashi v the people
Not the same eff on a reasonable man makomela v the people ka

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Loss of sc

A

Munkala v the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Diminished responsibility

A

Not an acquittal
1.abnormality of mind
Due to anything under 12(a)(1)
3. Any of these must have substantial effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Abnormality of mind

A

Medical evidence is required r v Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Substantial impairment of responsibility

A

Has substantial effect on the accused
Makes them act that way and then a reasonable man can see he is cray