Homicide Flashcards

1
Q

What is the AR and MR of murder?

A

AR
* Unlawful killing
* causes death
* of a human being
* during king’s peace
MR
* with intent to kill or cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the sentence for murder?

A

Mandatory life sentence
* judge has no discretion (may recommend minimum term before D can be ROL)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will a killing not be unlawful for the purposes of murder?

A
  • enemy during war
  • advancement of justice (death penalty)
  • Self defence: reasonable force + necessary to prevent crime or protect life, limb or property
  • Necessity (conjoined twins)
  • Doctor switching off life support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When will causation be satisfied for murder?

A

D was the factual and legal cause of V’s death and there were no intervening events:
1. Factual: but for D, V would not have died the way they did (conduct accelerates death more than negligbly)
2. Legal: substantial and operating cause (more than minimal, need not be sole. D must be culpable, egg-shell skull)
3. No intervening events: daft escape, unforseeable natural event, voluntary or not reasonably forseeable act of 3rd party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What constitutes a human being for the purposes of murder?

A

V is born alive and capable of independent life
NOT:
* Corpse (dead when brain cannot control basic functions i.e. on life support to survive)
* Foetus (baby must have been expelled from mother but umbilical cord may still be attached)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What will satisfy the MR of murder

A

Direct intent: death / GBH was aim or purpose
Indirect intent: Death or GBH was virtually certain and D appreciated this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is it relevant to consider voluntary manslaughter?

A

D satisfies the AR and MR of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is it relevant to consider involuntary manslaughter?

A

D has killed someone but did not intend to cause death or inflict GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What parial defences consistute voluntary manslaughter?

A

Loss of control
Diminished Responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What offences constitute involuntary manslaughter?

A

Gross Negligence Manslaughter
Unlawful Act Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What elements must D prove on the balance of probabilities to establish diminished responsibility?

A
  • D suffered an abnormality of mental functioning
  • D’s abnormality of mental functioning arose from:
    1. A recognised medical condition
    2. Substantially impaired D’s ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgement, or exercise self-control; and
    3. Provides an explanation for D’s conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is D’s sentence if they successfuly plead voluntary manslaughter

loss of control or diminished responsibility

A

At discretion of judge
- No mandatory life sentence (custodial sentence not required)
- judge can take account of all relevant factors to determine sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who has the burden of proof in relation to diminished responsibility?

A

D has legal and **evidential **burden of proving the defence on the **balance of probabilites **

Note: where a medical expert gives uncontested evidence AND all elements are satisfied, judge shoudl withdraw murder charge from jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is meant by abnormality of mental functioning?

A

Ds state of mind is so different from ordinary humans a reasonable person would term it abnormal (interpreted widely)

17
Q

What conditions are included within the definition of a recognised medical condition for the purposes of diminished responsibility

A
  • ADS (not heavy binge drinking)
  • undiagnosed conditions
18
Q

What does the fact that medical condition must provide an explanation for D’s conduct mean in relation to diminished responisbility mean?

A

killed because of medical condition not because of rage, jealousy etc. that was not a result of their condition)

19
Q

does a medical condition need to be the only reason D killed for diminished responsibility

A

No (i.e. ok if alcohol triggered a medical condition which otherwise would not have arisen)

20
Q

If D is an alcoholic what must the jury do when considering diminished responisbility?

A

Disregard the effect of alcohol consumed voluntarily and focus exclusively on teh effect of alcohol consumed as a result of their illness

21
Q

What is the burden of proof for loss of control?

A

D has evidential burden to raise defence when giving evidence
P has legal burden to disprove beyond reasonable doubt
Judge decides whether D can present defence to jury (likely to refuse if baby crying, honour killing, conditional threat)

22
Q

What are the elements of loss of control?

A
  • Loss of self-control
  • D loses control due to fear or anger trigger
  • A normal person may have acted similarly to D
23
Q

What constitutes loss of self control?

A

D must be unable to restrain themselves (loss of temper insufficient)
loss of control need not be sudden if response to a culmination of abuse that occurs over time

24
Q

What is the test for the fear trigger (loss of control)

A

D must fear serious violence toward themselves or another identified person (subjective test)

25
What is the test for the anger trigger (loss of control)?
D must lose self control due to: 1. **Things said or done **(word or act not circumstance alone e.g. slow moving traffic) 2. **word or action consistute circumstances of extremely grave nature** (unusual / more than trivial) 3. **word or action causes D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged** (normal person would feel same) - objective test
26
What is the normal person test (loss of control)?
1. What is the gravity of the qualifying trigger to a person in D's circumstances? 2. Would a **normal person of ordinary tolerance and self-restraint** have acted similarly to D in the circumstances?
27
What can the jury account for when considering the normal person test for loss of control
A normal person of D's gender, age, sexual orientation, colour, sexual infidelity, addict with normal levels of tolerance, self restraint and be sober) NOT: bad temper, intoxication, extreme sensitivity, PTSD, personality disorder
28
When can loss of control not be relied on?
- D acted in considered desire for revenge (e.g. evidence of planning or delay between trigger and act) -D incited V as an excuse to use violence against them - sexual infidelity is the sole qualifying trigger (if other relevant triggers then sexual infidelity can also be considered) - D is charged with attempted murder
29
What is the AR and MR of unlawful act manslaughter?
AR - **Voluntary** - **Unlawful act:** (AR + MR of criminal offence) not careless dirivng or an omission - **Dangerous**: D's act presents risk of some harm - **Causes V's death**: factual and legal causation MR of unlawful act
30
What is the test for whether an unlawful act is dangerous (unlawful act manslaughter)
A **sober and reasonable** person must consider **D's act** presents the risk of **some harm** albeit not serious harm (objective test) - not emotional harm - Reasonable person knows everything D knew and has any special knowledge D had or should have had and does nto make any unreasonable mistakes D made
31
When will D be liable for unlawful act manslaughter in relation to supplying drugs?
Liable: - administers drug to V with V's permission - Supplies drug to V and V is decieved does not know what they are taking Not liable: - Supplies drug or assists V AND V voluntarily self administers AND V is a fully informed adult
32
What is the AR and MR of gross negligence manslaughter?
AR: * D owes V a duty of care * D breaches duty * breach causes death * risk of death * D grossly negligent NO MR: proof of state of mind is not required
33
When will D owe V a duty of care for purposes of gross negligence manslaughter?
* established duty: judge will direct jury that a duty exists * novel duty: judge will decide whether there is evidence capable of establishing a duty and if so the jury will determine whether D owes V a duty * omission if special relationship, statute, contract, assumption of responisbility, dangerous situation
34
What does risk of death mean for purposes of gross negligent manslaughter?
**Obvious and serious** risk D's conduct could **cause death** at the time of the breach (not just injury or serious injury) - not possibility of death in future / life threatening
35
When will D be grossly negligent for gross negligent manslaughter?
D's conduct fell so far below the standards of the reasonable person they are deserving of criminal punishment - D recognised risk / made multiple errors / is experienced unlikely grossly negligent if D's mistakes are brought about by mistakes of others