Homicide Flashcards

Murder and manslaughter

1
Q

Murder legislation

A

MURDER -

S4(1) where person kills another unlawfully… shall not be murder unless the person intended to kill or cause serious injury to some person whether that person is actually killed or somebody else.

S4(2) AC is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his conduct – presumption may be reputed – (Presumption of Intention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Murder punishment

A

Mandatory Life imprisonment – S2 Criminal Justice Act 1990. Capital Murder: 40 years imprisonment - S3 1990 Act.
- This mandatory sentencing was challenged unsuccessfully in Lynch & Whelan v the Minister or Justice [2010] IESC 34 – where it was argued the mandatory life sentence was repugnant to the Constitution and incompatible with the ECHR. This was rejected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DPP v Eadon

A

Mens Rea

What AC intended is to be inferred from what others see and hear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Cunningham

A

Mens Rea

D repeatedly struck victim with chair and died – HELD: intention to cause serious harm sufficient for murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DPP v Benko

A

Mens Rea

attempted murder of wife, hit her 3 times with hammer while she was sleeping. ‘Context is everything. The actions of the accused person fall to be construed by juries in light of all the circumstances. We use this kind of reasoning every day of the week in our ordinary lives and it is merely formalised for the purpose of a criminal trial.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AG v Dwyer

A

Voluntary Manslaughter - Self-Defence

self-defence and used more force than was necessary but no more than he honestly believed was necessary (accused stabbed and killed someone after that person had hit him over head with object)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Holzer

A

Involuntary manslaughter - Assault MS

AC punched victim, splitting his lib – he fell backwards hit his head and died.
HELD: Since harm intended was merely trivial, could not be convicted of manslaughter.
- The De minimis principle applies – injury intended must not be merely trivial or negligible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Hayward

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Assault MS

‘no violence need to be visited upon the victim’ – chased wife who died – thyroid condition that made her susceptible to physical exertion and fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mahon (2019)

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Assault MS

The appellant had been charged with murder but convicted of
the lesser offence of manslaughter – situation was one in which he had produced a knife in the course of an altercation with the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Larkin

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Act MS

AC waived razor to frighten mistress lover – she fell and died from it HELD: waiving razor was an unlawful and dangerous act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Scarlett

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Act MS

defendant landlord of public house – victim wouldn’t leave – d escorted him out where he fell and died – conviction quashed as there was no criminal or unlawful act, the degree of force used was not ‘more than what was called for.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Cato

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Act MS

D injected heroin into deceased who died – administering substance is criminal, consent does not absolve liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DPP v Kierans

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Negligence MS

man who had a sawn off shot gun – intended to use it to threaten wife he would kill himself if she didn’t believe he wasn’t having an extra-marital affair – ended up killing the wife ‘accidentally’ – he was convicted of manslaughter by gross negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AG v Dunleavy

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Negligence MS

D drove unlit car on wrong side of road and killed cyclist – cyclist also
negligent.
HELD: Davitt P – ‘must be satisfied the fatal negligence was of a very high degree and was such as to involve in a high degree, the risk or likelihood of substantial personal injury to others.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DPP v Cullagh

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Negligence MS

fairground – chairoplane – victim killed – HELD: Murphy J ‘ has to be gross negligence and not the ordinary standard of civil negligence – negligence required is a matter of degree considering all the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DPP v Joel

A

Involuntary Manslaughter - Criminal Negligence

CNM arises where the death of another is caused in circumstances which objectively amount to a very high degree of negligence and which … to any reasonable person the fact that an unjustifiable risk was taken within the life of another would have been apparent.’

17
Q

AG v Quinlan

A

Dangerous Driving

driving in a manner in which a reasonably prudent motorist, having regard to all the circumstances, would clearly recognise as involving a direct and serious risk.’

18
Q

DPP v OShea

A

Dangerous Driving

offence of careless driving causing death – strict liability offence

19
Q

R v Seymour

A

Dangerous Driving

held mens rea is in adopting a type of driving that involves an obvious and serious risk of causing physical injury, driver fails to give any thought to possibility of there being such risk, or if hasconsidered it, nonetheless gone and taken that risk