Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Murder offence and sentence

A

Indictable only and mandatory life sentence, common law offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Définition of murder

A

Lord Coke 1797 : The unlawful killing of a human being under the King’s peace, with malice a forethought expressed or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The actus reus of murder

A

Unlawful killing and causation
Murder is a result crime from omission or acts caused it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Human being

A

AG référence no. 3 1994 - - stabbed pregnant girlfriend - - - foetus is not a human being
Mr Y - - - - no longer rule on every life machine case
Airedale NHS trust v bland - - - best interest of patient veg state 2 years
R v Malcherek and Steel - - - life support doctors not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Die within a year and a day

A

1996 reform - die within 3 years due to technology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Men’s rea for murder

A

Malice a forethought expressed or implied
Intent to kill (expressed)
Intent to cause GBH (implied) (R v Vickers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Loss of control

A

S54, 55 cja 2009 replaced provocation s37 homicide act 1957
Partial defence - - voluntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Définition for loss of control

A

Where a person kills or is a party to the killing of another, D is not to be convicted if
Ds acts and omissions in doing so resulted from Ds loss of self control
The loss of control has a qualifying trigger, and
A person of Ds age or sex, with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint in Ds circumstance may have reacted in a similar or same way
No desire for revenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Loss of self control

A

At Time of killing but trigger doesn’t
Doesn’t matter whether sudden
R v alhuwalia
Ibrams v Gregory - 5 day gap too long had time to plan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Qualifying triggers

A

S55
Fear of serious violence from v against d or other identified person
Attributable to things done or said which constitutes circumstances of extremely grave nature and caused d a justifiable sense of being wronged
Or combination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fear trigger

A

Subjective - d must fear violence not 3rd party, fear violence must be used against d or other identified person.
Ward, Alhuwalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Anger trigger

A

S55(4) has 2 circumstances of grave character and justifiable sense of being wronged (objective by a reasonable person)
Dawes - shows that it is objective
Hatter - breaking up will not justify or cause grave nature
Zebedee - father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Limitation of triggers

A

Self induced triggers not relied upon
Cheating is not a good enough reason but could be a factor
No desire for revenge (Clinton)
Incite violence to use it (Dawes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Standard of self control (objective limb)

A

Age, sex, circumstances, normal tolerance, normal self restraint
Mohammed - stabbed daughter had religious beliefs and short temper ( no short temper).
Gregson - unemployed, depression, epilepsy taunts him these are relevant circumstances
Hill
Van dongen - even if normal person lost control must act same or similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Diminished responsibility background

A

S2 homicide act 1957 amended to s52 cja 2009
Partial defence voluntary manslaughter- or prison alternatives s45 or34 mental health act 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Abnormality of mental functioning

A

State of mind is so different from that of ordinary human beings that a reasonable man would term it abnormal — objective test for jury
(Doesn’t need to be permanent)

17
Q

Arising from a medical condition

A

Any inherent cause , induced by injury or disease
E.g alhuwalia-bws ,gittens-depression , smith - pms , epilepsy campbell etc

18
Q

Substantial impairment

A

In between total and trivial (juries)
Good seers Galbraith Lloyd Byrne

19
Q

Substantial impairment ( understand nature of conduct )

A

Situations when acting automatically and unaware ( sleepwalking, delusions )

20
Q

Substantial impairment ( form a rational judgement)

A

Can’t judge their actions /omissions (paranoia, bws) Martin paranoid shot intruders
Ahluwalia

21
Q

Substantial impairment ( exercise self control)

A

Medical evidence unable to control desire Byrne , knowing it is wrong

22
Q

Explanation for d s conduct

A

If it causes , or is a significant factor in causing d to do it
Must be causal connection between abnormality and killing

23
Q

Intoxication

A

Disease of the mind - alcohol and drugs addiction recognised medical condition (ads) not just intoxicated
Dowds, Dietshmann, wood