Holism vs Reductionism Flashcards

1
Q

What is Holism?

A
  • focuses on the person as a whole rather than on individual parts
  • holism takes multiple variables into account when explaining behaviour
  • all humans are unique and motivated to achieve their full potential
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reductionism?

A
  • levels of explanation: we can consider behaviour in terms of all levels
  • biological: as humans are made up of atoms, then behaviour must be explainable at this basic level
  • behavioural: as humans learn from the environment their behaviour must be explained at this basic level
  • experimental psychology: all behaviour has a cause and effect and therefore reducing behaviour to variables means it can be explained at this basic level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AO3: the ability to explain complex behaviour

A
  • a strength of holism is that it can explain complex elements of human behaviour
  • it can explain social behaviours that only emerge within a group context
  • for example, the effects of de-individualisation of prisoners and guards in the Stanford prison experiment could not be understood by studying the participants as individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AO3: oversimplifies complex human behaviour

A
  • a limitation of reductionism

- this is when an explanation only focuses on one level and ignored the other levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AO3: real life application

A
  • this is when the principles of an approach are put into practice outside of the laboratory
  • for example, since the 1950s, drug therapies like antidepressants have been used to help balance neurotransmitter levels in the brain
  • a reductionist approach is beneficial and had led do a decrease in the number of people being hospitalised for depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AO3: interactionist approach

A
  • not possible to separate either debate s both contribute to behaviour
  • abnormal behaviour would be best explained by considering all factors but in some cases you can only treat abnormal behaviour using reductionism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly