Hobbes Flashcards

1
Q

Two Seeds of Religion. What are they, what are their resultant political conceptions, and what are the imports of those?

A

Introduce
- Disinterested desire for knowledge and ignorance of causation
- The former prompts the first cause problem. The latter prompts anxiety, and leads to the worshiping of invisible causes.
- Power hungry subsequently take advantage of this ignorance and form sects.
Conclude - he thinks religion is the main cause of civil war, and that a leviathan must be used to mitigate this violence.
It’s also one insight into human nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hobbes’ conception of felicity and its role in his political thought.

A

Intro
- Human ontology, vital and voluntary motion.
- Latter leads to seeking pleasure/avoid aversions
- When achieved, this is felicity
- Distinct from happiness in that it is fleeting, and is constantly being sought.
- Political purpose: it drives our endless race for relative power
Conclude - Explains human nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain claim that ‘there is a general inclusion in humankind a perpetual race for power that ceases only in death’.

A

Introduce - motions and felicity
- To achieve and maintain felicity for as long as possible, we seek power.
- This power is relative, for if anyone has more, then can take our things.
- Most people are cool with modest things, but they want to protect them.
- You never know how much power one could have in the future, so it is endless.
- Instrumental and original power.
Conclude - this is the basis of conflict in the nature of nature, leviathan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is the state of nature a state of equality?

A

Intro - in two ways
- It is morally equal in that everyone has the same right to self-preservation, and any means to preserve it.
- Physically equal. Especially in mind, but also physically. One might be stronger, but we all sleep, equal in vulnerability.
- If we weren’t equal, there would be little conflict, one would dominate the other.
Conclude - why there is conflict, why we need coercive power, leviathan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three Causes of Quarrel

A

Introduce -
- Invasion for gain - based in competition
- Invasion for diffidence - based in safety
Invasion for glory - based in reputation
- these are caused by our equality, and themselves cause underdeveloped culture.
Conclude - must contract sovereignty, leviathan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Laws of nature exist foro interno but not always foro externo. How do we bring them into externo? What problem needs solving?

A

Introduce - 19 laws
- We must fix the assurance problem
- Without coercive, one is not obligated to follow a contract, it would threaten their safety.
- We need a fear greater than that of others’ power - a leviathan
Conclude - human nature, first social contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Present the role of the first three laws of nature in getting us out of the state of nature. We have both the motive to leave and the means.

A

Introduce - 19 laws that we discover
- must seek peace
- must give up freedom
- abide by contracts with assurance
- our motive is our self-preservation and have natural law realized
Conclude - only way to escape, and human nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the position of the fool? What is Hobbes’ reply to the fool?

A

Intro - mutually-binding contracts
- fool’s position is that, in contracts, people have the right to break them to preserve themselves through instrumental power
- Hobbes says no because reputation and harm
Conclude - Hobbes admits this is a weak point, and a common disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Present 5 rights of the Leviathan.

A

Intro - for stability, they get rights
1. Immunity against revolt - self-defense like everyone else
2. Immunity against accusations of breaking contract - they were not party to the contract
3. Territorial Jurisdiction - all must consent, no regression
4. Property - can assign, don’t want that conflict
5. Undivided power - legislative, judicial, executive, ecclesiastical, all in one place. No one above.
Conclude - leads into the intolerable doctrines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Four intolerable doctrines that should be censored by the sovereign.

A

Intro - after six rights
1. Every person is judge of good/evil - no debating
2. If against conscience, sin - conform to public conscience
3. Religion can’t justify disobedience - most common. Just hold faith in heart.
4. Sovereign is subject to law - gets undivided power. If not, they’re not sovereign.
Conclude - this shows Hobbes’ strong opposition to pluralism, and that ultimate goal is avoiding civil war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Present his idea of the two kinds of liberty of subjects.

A

Introduce - based in negative liberty from state (lack of opposition to our motions)
- First is contingent liberty. This is a relative concept that says we all must obey the laws of our land.
- True liberty. Universally every one right to self-defense including the leviathan. Any contract without out is void.
Conclude - only instance where disobedience is justified. Some aspects of nature stay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Present Hobbes’ idea of the two origins of states.

A

Introduce
- Commonwealth by institution - one that is established by those who wanted it through a contract.
- Commonwealth by acquisition. One that has been colonized.
- One is characterized by fear of each other, the other by fear of others.
- Both are legitimate because the colonized will consent
Conclude - social contract, odd definition of consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Present Hobbes’ regression argument for absolutism.

A

Introduce
- His main defense of absolutism/monarchism is that is will preclude a regression to the state of nature the best. They have the best minds at their disposal, not accountable.
- It is only instrumental value. If other system could do better, then great.
- He thinks democracy is prone to demagoguery and conflict. You can’t disagree with yourself! (monarchy)
Conclude - consequentialist, government as mitigation, not provider.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Three parts of Hobbes case against martyrdom

A

Intro - how to address in a commonwealth
- Miracles are done, you can disbelieve prophets, not the scripture
- religious power only evangelism, not coercion (bad instrument anyway)
- Christians must obey sovereigns. Keep faith in your heart.
Conclude - he might not believe this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly