HIV and DCs + Autophagy Flashcards
HIV prevalence
HIV was first seen in Africa probably in 1920s, but it took 1980s to see the cases of HIV for real, and people hoped to have a vaccine in couple of years, we still don’t have a vaccine. There’s a cured patient –completely HIV free- seen with bone marrow transplant from CCR5 mutated donor in 2011, he died a while ago because he had a cancer relapse. HIV is a huge problem in South Africa especially, and new cases keep increasing in world. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) stopped a lot of deaths. But a lot of people still dies.
How does HIV transmit?
Sexual intercourse is main route of infection, involves mucosal tissues in genital tract and it transmits through mucosa.
The chances of getting HIV infection while having sexual contact with an infected person is at best %1.
Enhanced when there’s inflammation or genital coinfections.
If the main route of infection is sexual contact, there are no T cells in mucosal tissues! How does T cells get infected after all if they aren’t on the primary site of infection? = DCs might be the answer, since there’s a lot of DCs in mucosal tissue.
So when there’s DCs on mucosa, they capture the pathogen and bring it to draining LN, and there’s T cells there. So it might be same mechanism for HIV.
How DCs induce adaptive immunity?
At immature stage, DCs can sense pathogens very good and capture them, they reside in almost all tissues including mucosal tissues. Upon interaction you get danger signal with PRRs. Then DCs get a genetic reprogramming (maturation) and change shape, and now instead of sensing, they can activate naïve T cells. So they migrate to LNs, and in LNs they instruct naïve T cells to become CD4 or CD8 T cells.
HIV structure
EM picture on left. Has a nuclear capsid, (protein p24) in middle there’s RNA. And it has RT to translate into DNA and integrate. Envelope glycoprotein is critical, gp120 + gp41. = heavily glycosylated.
Gp120 is like the spike protein on SARS, main recognition molecule, and it binds to CD4 on T cell, and with co-receptor that can be CCR5 or CXCR4 or even both in different types of HIV. R5 TROPIC / X4 TROPIC / DUAL TROPIC on some cells
. T cell recognizes the HIV with CD4-CCR5/CXCR4 always.
In DCs, gp120 binds a completely different receptor.
gp120 is covered with carbohydrates called mannoses: so its covered with mannosylated glycans. This is also why immune system has a trouble with making Abs against it, almost all protein is covered with sugars, protein is inaccessible.
Study theory of DCs bringing HIV to T cells
1) Binding of HIV to DCs
Gp120 binds to DCs, it might also bind to CD4 on DCs, but when you block it, there’s no change, so it doesn’t; and it doesn’t bind to CCR5 either.
But when you block DC-SIGN, interaction of HIV with DCs are blocked.
So HIV binds DC-SIGN on DCs.
DC-SIGN binds to carbohydrates. Gp120 is covered with carbohydrates too
DC-SIGN
DC SIGN is found as tetramer on the surface, it has neck region (transmembrane) and a cytoplasmic domain for signaling. On top, there’s carbohydrate recognition domain that binds glycans.
Lewis X etc. is recognised, mannose.
DC-SIGN binds to other pathogens too.
Study theory of DCs bringing HIV to T cells
2) What happens when HIV binds to DC-SIGN? + infectious synapse
DC-SIGN can internalize HIV. If you give DC SIGN any carbohydrate ligand, it’s targeted directly to the lysosomes. = So any carbohydrate is leaded to degradation.
HIV is in between T cells and DC. Exactly in the place of synapse = infectious synapse. Virus accumulates in synapse, then transferred to the T cells!
What happens when HepC binds to DC sign? Random info
HepC isn’t taken to lysosomes? Where does it go? It goes to early endosomes. =then it escapes.
Study theory of DCs bringing HIV to T cells
3) Study DC-SIGN + HIV + T cell interaction synapses: + transinfection / cisinfection
1) Give DC-SIGN very low dose HIV. If you give same dose to T cells, no T cell infection would occur. So the dose is only enough for presentation. Even no need to wash since u can’t infect T cells.
2) After a certain time, give the T cells.
3) Check the presentation: Whether DC sign hands over the HIV to T cells. Note: it doesn’t process hiv or break it down, gives it directly as a whole.
4) Once T cells get infected by DC, they produce HIV on their own. Virus has p24 protein, and if you do an ELISA for it, you can see whether HIV proliferates or not. (p24 count is correlated with HIV count from T cells – since DC doesn’t produce any virus.)
After a couple of days, virus production increases. So it means T cells are infected, and HIV is proliferating inside T cells. If CD4 or CCR5 is blocked, no inhibition is observed (T cells still get infected) but if you block DC-SIGN, infection is 2.5 folds reduced.
So it doesn’t bind via CD4 or CCR5 to DCs, via DC-SIGN.
So DC captures the virus, somehow keeps it inside intact, and hands it over to T cells. In this way, DC-SIGN brings HIV from mucosa to the LNs!
If you get infected via blood, you don’t need this DC carrying, T cells will get infected anyway with high concentration of HIV.
For the mucosal route, DCs are critical.
Handing over pathogen from one cell to another = Trans infection. If DCs would hand it over to another DC, then it would be a cis infection.
In some cells, DC-sign can also mediate cis-infection, then it really acts as an attachment receptor. And binding of the HIV is enough to infect the DC itself. DC-SIGN is also a signaling molecule, and it might lead to immune modulation, eg. Signaling via DC-SIGN can inhibit Type I IFN production by DCs, which is critical for antiviral immunity
Study theory of DCs bringing HIV to T cells
3) How long HIV remains protected inside DCs?
Even at Day 6, DCs are preserving HIV to be handed over to T cells.
So DC-SIGN picks up the virus at mucosa, internalizes it, and HIV stays inside the DC in a protected way. Staining shows that indeed HIV is preserved in an internal compartment.
Upon encounter with a T cell, virus is handed over again with DC SIGN to the CD4 + coreceptor. = Synapse formation is observed.
Thick mucosal layer + LCs
DC-SIGN (+) cells are in the submucosal layer. So to get infected, virus has to first transfer through the thick mucosal layer. Can explain why you get easily infected when there’s wounds/inflammation.
mucosal layer has other DCs that doesn’t have DC-SIGN: Langerhans cells. Langerhans cells reside more in the upper layer. DC-SIGN positive cells are found usually in deeper layers, both in mucosa and skin.
What happens when HIV interacts with LC? 1) Get LCs to study - same method for getting DCs
How to get LCs for studying: from skin, 1) Take skin from plastic surgery/tummy tuck lol.
2) Cut the upper layer with dermatome (knife), so you get epidermis and dermis.
3) Incubate it with the enzyme Dispase, and get the epidermis only.
4) Add trypsin, degrade, using magnetic beads, isolate pure immature LC from skin.
5) You can also separate epithelia and subepithelia = get DCs
What happens when HIV interacts with LC?
2) DC -Sign - Langerin - Mannan study
What’s Langerin?
DCs = infect T cells
DCs + mannan = can’t infect T cells, mannan binds DC-SIGN
LCs = can’t infect, no DC-SIGN
LCs + mannan = can infect? LANGERIN IS BLOCKED.
Langerin is specific receptor for LCs. So if Langerin captures the HIV, you don’t get transmission! Opposite to DC-SIGN. When Langerin is blocked, transmission occurs.
Very similar to DC-SIGN structure, has also carbohydrate recognition domain with similar specificity, they both bind to mannose structures on HIV.
If a cell is Langerin (+) it makes tennis like structures called Birbeck Granules, it’s part of the endolysosomal route
What happens when HIV interacts with LC?
2) Langerin - HIV binding study
What happens after binding?
Anti-DC-SIGN Ab doesn’t prevent the binding, well since LCs don’t have DC-SIGN, mannan and Anti-langerin Ab stops the HIV binding. So Langerin is the primary receptor on LC that HIV binds.
Electron microscopy proof:
Bigger particles = HIV, LC is smaller particles, and they colocalize.
Langerin + HIV binding causes HIV to be internalized and they go to Birbeck granules. So Langerin captures the virus, but instead of handing it over to T cells, it degrades them inside the Birbeck granules.
HIV - normal mucosa vs injured mucosa
1) Normal mucosa, HIV is captured by LC = degraded, no infection.
2) Injured mucosa, then they reach DC-SIGN (+) cells in submucosa –lower layers-, and they bring the virus to LN, and you get T cell infection.